Comparison of coronary flow reserve feasibility and values in different stress echocardiography protocols: dobutamine, dipyridamole, exercise and rapid pacing
Abstract Background and aims To compare the feasibility of Coronary Flow Velocity Reserve (CFVR) assessment in the left anterior descending (LAD) artery in four types of stress echocardiography (SE): dobutamine (DOB), dipyridamole (DIP), rapid pacing (PAC) and bicycle exercise (EXE). Methods and results We subjected 369 patients (mean age: 67±11 years) to SE with DOB (up to 40 mcg/kg/min, n=230), DIP (0.84 mg/kg, n=73), PAC (n=22) or EXE (n=44). CFVR was measured as the ratio of peak diastolic coronary flow velocity (CFV) during exercise, pharmacological stress or pacing and peak diastolic CFV at rest in distal or mid LAD. The feasibility was excellent during PAC (100%), DOB (95%) and DIP (95%) and lower during EXE (73%, p<0.01 vs other groups) when assessed in all consecutive patients. When assessed in patients having readable LAD flow at rest the feasibility achieved even higher values, being however still lowered in EXE group, see Figure 1. In multivariate analysis only the EXE protocol was a predictor of LAD flow loss during SE, with OR = 8.23 (95% CI 2.17 – 31.33), p=0.0019. CFVR was lower with PAC (1.8±0.4) as compared to DIP (2.2±0.6, p=0.0061) and DOB (2.2±0.6, p=0.0025), but similar to EXE (2.0±0.6, p=0.178), and correlated best with the peak heart rate in EXE and PAC, see Figure 2. Conclusion CFVR in LAD can be obtained during all forms of SE, but the feasibility is significantly higher with PAC and pharmacological tests as compared to EXE, which was identified in our study as the independent predictor of the loss of LAD flow recording at the peak of stress test. Moreover, CFVR values were the lowest in PAC group which however encompassed the older patients with more advanced coronary artery disease. Significant correlation between HR and CFVR observed in EXE and PAC suggests that in this type of SE cut-off value of CFVR should be probably indexed to maximal HR achieved. FUNDunding Acknowledgement Type of funding sources: None. Figure 1 Figure 2