scholarly journals Comparative analysis of sequential pot-side-pot and kissing balloon techniques in patients with coronary bifurcation lesions treated with single stent strategy: propensity score analysis

2021 ◽  
Vol 42 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
G Cetinkal ◽  
B Balaban Kocas ◽  
K Keskin ◽  
H Kilci ◽  
O Ser ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Propensity Score ◽  
Propensity Score Analysis ◽  
Side Branch ◽  
Adverse Outcomes ◽  
Procedure Time ◽  
Coronary Bifurcation ◽  
Residual Stenosis ◽  
Coronary Bifurcation Lesions ◽  
Number Of Patients ◽  
Bifurcation Lesions

Abstract Objectives It is unknown whether the novel re-POT technique is more effective than commonly preferred kissing balloon inflation (KBI) in patients with non-complex coronary bifurcation lesions (CBL) treated with single-stent strategy. Our aim was to compare the efficacy of re-POT and KBI techniques in one-stent strategy of non-complex CBL. Methods 283 patients were retrospectively analyzed (re-POT group, n=149; KBI group, n=134). Primary end-points of the study were defined as; in-hospital and 30-day mortality, contrast induced acute kidney injury (CI-AKI), stent thrombosis (ST), side branch (SB) dissection and need for SB stenting. Characteristics of patients at baseline were balanced by using propensity score inverse probability weighting (IPW). Results Procedure time (minute, 30.6±8.5 vs 34.3±11.6; p=0.003) and contrast volume (mL, 153.7±42.4 vs 171.1±58.2; p=0.004) were significantly lower in re-POT group. Besides, SB residual stenosis and number of patients with >50% SB residual stenosis remained significantly higher in re-POT group both in general and true bifurcation subgroup analysis (20.3±19.8% vs 16.5±16.4%, p=0.02; 11.9% vs 5.7%, p=0.01 and 24.1±23.2% vs 18.8±18.7%, p=0.03; 17.6% vs 6.6%, p=0.005; respectively). Combined clinical adverse outcomes were similar between groups. (Figure 1) SB dissection (10.2% vs 20.1%, p=0.001) and need for SB stenting (12.6% vs 19%, p=0.04) were reached statistically significance in KBI group after adjustment. (Figure 2) Conclusions Re-POT may be a simple and safe technique with a shorter procedure time and lower incidence of adverse events in non-complex CBL treated with single-stent strategy. FUNDunding Acknowledgement Type of funding sources: None. Adverse clinical outcomes; weighted

Dedicated Bifurcation Stents Strategy

2009 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 70
Author(s):  
Chen Shao-Liang ◽  
Imad Sheiban ◽  
◽  
Keyword(s):  
Interventional Cardiology ◽  
Daily Practice ◽  
Side Branch ◽  
Control Groups ◽  
Coronary Bifurcation ◽  
Percutaneous Approach ◽  
Coronary Bifurcation Lesions ◽  
Drug Eluting ◽  
Bifurcation Lesions ◽  
Provisional Stenting

Coronary bifurcation lesions represent an area of ongoing challenges in interventional cardiology, mainly due to the higher rate of residual stenosis and restenosis at the side branch ostium. Multiple two-stent bifurcation strategies, including T-stenting, V-stenting, simultaneuos kissing stenting, culotte stenting and classic crush techniques, have no advantages over one-stent techniques. This led to provisional stenting being considered as a mainstream approach, based on the results of numerous randomised trials. Dedicated bifurcation stents have been designed specifically to treat coronary bifurcations with the aim of addressing some of the shortcomings of the conventional percutaneous approach and facilitating the provisional approach. The development of more drug-eluting platforms and larger studies with control groups demonstrating their clinical applicability, efficacy and safety are required before these stents are widely incorporated into daily practice.

Side branch long lesion with main vessel vulnerable plaques by optical coherence tomography predict target-vessel myocardial infarction after provisional stenting in patients with coronary bifurcation

2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (Supplement_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
S.L Chen
Keyword(s):  
Side Branch ◽  
Lesion Group ◽  
Lesion Length ◽  
Coronary Bifurcation ◽  
Coronary Bifurcation Lesions ◽  
Vulnerable Plaques ◽  
Main Vessel ◽  
Bifurcation Lesions ◽  
Provisional Stenting ◽  
One Year

Abstract Background Provisional side branch (SB) stenting is correlated with target-vessel myocardial infarction (TVMI) in patients with coronary bifurcation lesions. However, the underlying mechanisms remain unknown. Objectives We aimed to determine the correlation of SB lesion length with vulnerable plaques using optical coherence tomography (OCT) and TVMI in patients with coronary bifurcation lesions treated by a provisional approach. Methods A total of 405 patients with 405 bifurcation lesions who underwent pre-PCI OCT imaging of both main vessel (MV) and SB was prospectively enrolled. Patients were defined as Long-SB lesion (SB lesion length ≥10 mm) and Short-SB lesion (SB lesion length <10 mm) groups according to quantitative coronary analysis and were also stratified by the presence of vulnerable plaques based on OCT findings. The primary endpoint was the occurrence of TVMI after provisional stenting at one-year follow-up. Results 178 (43.9%) patients had long SB lesions. Vulnerable plaques predominantly localized in the main vessel (MV) and more frequently in the Long-SB lesion group (42.7%) compared to 24.2% in the Short-SB lesion group (p<0.001). At one-year follow-up after provisional stenting, there were 31 (8.1%) TVMIs, with 11.8% in the Long-SB lesion group and 4.4% in the Short-SB lesion group (p=0.009), leading to significant difference in target lesion failure between two groups (15.2% vs. 6.6%, p=0.007). The rate of cardiac death, revascularization, and stent thrombosis was comparable between study groups. By multivariate regression analysis, long SB lesion length (p=0.011), presence of vulnerable plaques in the polygon of confluence (p=0.001), and true coronary bifurcation lesions (p=0.004) were three independent factors of TVMI. Conclusions Long-SB lesion length with MV vulnerable plaques predict increased TVMI after provisional stenting in patients with true coronary bifurcation lesions. Further study is warranted to identify the better stenting techniques for coronary bifurcation lesions with long lesion in the SB Kaplan-Meier survival curve Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding source: Foundation. Main funding source(s): NSFC

scholarly journals Carina Bifurcation Angle and Side Branch Occlusion in Coronary Bifurcation Lesions Intervention: Angiographic Lesions Characteristic Role in Determining Its Relation

2018 ◽  
Vol 28 (02) ◽  
pp. 137-141 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bogie Putra Palinggi ◽  
Doni Firman
Keyword(s):  
Percutaneous Coronary Intervention ◽  
Coronary Intervention ◽  
Side Branch ◽  
Coronary Bifurcation ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Bifurcation Angle ◽  
Coronary Bifurcation Lesions ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
Percutaneous Coronary ◽  
Bifurcation Lesions

AbstractSide branch occlusion has been implicated as a complication after percutaneous coronary intervention in coronary bifurcation lesions. The role of carina bifurcation angle as one of the characteristics of the coronary bifurcation lesions in causing side branch occlusion after percutaneous coronary intervention is still debated. This study aims to assess the correlation between carina bifurcation angles as one of the characteristics of the coronary bifurcation lesions and side branch occlusion in elective percutaneous coronary intervention. This is a cross-sectional study which utilizes CAAS 5.1 software to measure carina bifurcation angle. We collected 113 lesions in 108 patients that met the inclusion criteria from January 2016 to October 2016. Side branch occlusion occurred in 15 lesions (13.3%), with median carina bifurcation angle 19.17 degrees (p < 0.001). Multivariate analysis showed there is a correlation between carina bifurcation angle with side branch occlusion, OR (odds ratio) 0.86 (95% CI [confidence interval]: 0.80–0.92) with ≤ 33.71 degrees cut off value. Increased risk of side branch occlusion was found in small carina bifurcation angle.

Analysis of Side Branch Access During Bifurcation Stenting

2008 ◽  
Author(s):  
Peter Mortier ◽  
Matthieu De Beule ◽  
Denis Van Loo ◽  
Benedict Verhegghe ◽  
Pascal Verdonck
Keyword(s):  
Side Branch ◽  
Local Blood Flow ◽  
Coronary Bifurcation ◽  
Coronary Bifurcation Lesions ◽  
Clinical Literature ◽  
Bifurcation Stenting ◽  
Common Technique ◽  
Flow Through ◽  
Bifurcation Lesions ◽  
Stenotic Arteries

A common technique to improve the local blood flow through stenotic arteries involves the implantation of a metallic scaffold known as a stent. These devices have shown excellent results in unbranched vessels. However, the treatment of coronary bifurcation lesions remains an enormous challenge and is generally associated with an increased complication rate. Many different techniques have been proposed in clinical literature, but all the suggested methodologies have specific limitations [1]. In many cases, a stent is deployed in the main branch (MB) and logically, this compromises the side branch (SB) patency. This is a frequently encountered situation that can be improved by balloon dilatation through the side of the MB stent (fig. 1). However, such balloon inflation may result in unwanted distortions of the stent [2].

scholarly journals A drug-eluting Balloon for the trEatment of coronarY bifurcatiON lesions in the side branch

2020 ◽  
Vol 133 (8) ◽  
pp. 899-908
Author(s):  
Quan-Min Jing ◽  
Xin Zhao ◽  
Ya-Ling Han ◽  
Ling-Ling Gao ◽  
Yang Zheng ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Side Branch ◽  
Coronary Bifurcation ◽  
Coronary Bifurcation Lesions ◽  
Drug Eluting ◽  
Bifurcation Lesions ◽  
Drug Eluting Balloon
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document