scholarly journals Doppler echocardiography pulmonary artery flow acceleration time: an adjunctive parameter to select candidates with suspected pulmonary hypertension to proceed to right heart catheterization

2013 ◽  
Vol 34 (suppl 1) ◽  
pp. P331-P331
Author(s):  
A. Fontana ◽  
A. Vincenzi ◽  
G. Paciocco ◽  
G. De Vito ◽  
A. Marinari ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pulmonary Hypertension ◽  
Pulmonary Artery ◽  
Doppler Echocardiography ◽  
Right Heart Catheterization ◽  
Heart Catheterization ◽  
Right Heart ◽  
Acceleration Time ◽  
Flow Acceleration ◽  
Pulmonary Artery Flow ◽  
Artery Flow

scholarly journals Effect of abnormal right heart structures on the diagnosis of pulmonary hypertension

2018 ◽  
Vol 8 (2) ◽  
pp. 204589401877305 ◽  
Author(s):  
Batool AbuHalimeh ◽  
Milind Y. Desai ◽  
Adriano R. Tonelli
Keyword(s):  
Pulmonary Hypertension ◽  
Pulmonary Artery ◽  
Right Heart Catheterization ◽  
The Other ◽  
Heart Catheterization ◽  
Right Heart ◽  
Cardiac Lesions ◽  
The Right ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Heart Lesions

The diagnosis of pulmonary hypertension (PH) requires a right heart catheterization (RHC) that reveals a mean pulmonary artery pressure ≥ 25 mmHg. The pulmonary artery catheter traverse the right atrium and ventricle on its way to the pulmonary artery. The presence of abnormal right heart structures, i.e. thrombus, vegetation, benign or malignant cardiac lesions, can lead to complications during this procedure. On the other hand, avoidance of RHC delays the diagnosis and treatment of PH, an approach that might be associated with worse outcomes. This paper discusses the impact of right heart lesions on the diagnosis of PH and suggests an approach on how to manage this association.

P4685Validation of noninvasive pulmonary artery pressure/flow relationship: echocardiography vs right heart catheterization

2019 ◽  
Vol 40 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
S Caravita ◽  
P Yerly ◽  
C Baratto ◽  
C Dewachter ◽  
A Rimouche ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pulmonary Artery ◽  
Pulmonary Artery Pressure ◽  
Doppler Echocardiography ◽  
Pulmonary Circulation ◽  
Right Heart Catheterization ◽  
Peak Exercise ◽  
Heart Catheterization ◽  
Right Heart ◽  
Pressure Flow ◽  
Relationship Of

Abstract Background Invasive pressure-flow (P/Q) relationship of the pulmonary circulation can detect the presence of pulmonary hypertension (PH) during exercise and provide information on patients' symptoms and assess disease severity. Doppler-echocardiography was reported to provide accurate but imprecise noninvasive estimates of both resting and exercise pulmonary haemodynamics. However, data on the direct comparison of invasive vs noninvasive approaches to build pressure-flow relationship are scarce. Purpose To compare echocardiographic estimates with invasive measurements of P/Q relationship of the pulmonary circulation during exercise. Methods Patients undergoing a clinically indicated right heart catheterization and echocardiography were studied at rest and during exercise. The ratio between mean pulmonary artery pressure and cardiac output at peak exercise (TPR), as well as P/Q slope throughout exercise were calculated. Both TPR and P/Q slope are abnormal when ≥3 mmHg/L/min. Echocardiographic estimates were compared with invasive measurements. Results Sixty patients were included (mean age 65±14 years, 73% female). PH was present at rest in 38 cases (63%), of precapillary origin in 23 (61%). Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction was diagnosed in 23 patients, of which 17 had no PH at rest. TPR at peak exercise and P/Q slope were abnormal (≥3 mmHg/L/min) in the majority of patients (56 and 45 subjects, respectively). Echocardiographic estimates of P/Q slope and TPR correlated significantly although weakly with invasive measurements (R2=0.38 and 0.56, respectively, p<0.001). Bias of echocardiography for P/Q slope and TPR was 1.1±4.2 and 0.4±2.9 mmHg/L/min, respectively (figure). Sensitivity of echocardiography to detect an abnormal TPR or P/Q slope (i.e. ≥3 mmHg/L/min) was 100 and 98%, respectively, faced by low specificity (0 and 33%, respectively). Figure 1 Conclusions Doppler-echocardiography can provide rather accurate and sensitive but imprecise estimates of pressure-flow relationships of the pulmonary circulation during exercise. This intrinsic imprecision may limit its use in clinical practice.

scholarly journals Diagnostic value of right heart and pulmonary artery catheterization in patients with suspected pulmonary hypertension. Part 1. Methodology of the procedure, nosology of the diseases and vasoreactivity testing

2020 ◽  
Vol 26 (6) ◽  
pp. 64-76
Author(s):  
Yu. M. Sirenko ◽  
I. O. Zhyvylo ◽  
G. D. Radchenko
Keyword(s):  
Pulmonary Hypertension ◽  
Cardiac Index ◽  
Pulmonary Artery ◽  
Pulmonary Vascular Resistance ◽  
Vascular Resistance ◽  
Right Heart Catheterization ◽  
Heart Catheterization ◽  
Pulmonary Artery Catheterization ◽  
Right Heart ◽  
The Mean

The aim – critical review of our own experience, its compliance with current recommendations and data from international registries, as also assessment of pulmonary and systemic hemodynamics obtained in patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) in Ukraine. Materials and methods. 220 procedures of the right heart and pulmonary artery catheterization were performed in 195 patients with medium or high probability of PAH according to echocardiography in compliance with current recommendations. All patients were hospitalized at National Scientific Center “M.D. Strazhesko Institute of Cardiology” of NAMS of Ukraine with suspected PAH (primary) or with worsening of the disease course (repeatedly) or in order to confirm the status of vasoreactivity (repeated).Results and discussion. 220 successful catheterization procedures were performed. Primary (diagnostic) right heart catheterization was performed in 195 patients, and repeated – in 25. A diagnosis of pulmonary hypertension was confirmed in 178 patients. In 17 patients, according to the results of catheterization, the diagnosis of PAH was excluded: the mean pressure in the pulmonary artery was less than 20 mm Hg. The structure of nosology in patients who underwent right heart catheterization was as follows: idiopathic PAH was fixed in 68 (38 %) patients, of which 11 (6 %) were vasoreactive; PAH associated with connective tissue diseases – in 21 (12 %) patients; PAH associated with HIV infection in – 4 (2 %) patients; PAH associated with portal hypertension – in 4 (2 %) patients; PAH associated with congenital heart disease – in 26 (15 %) patients; chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension – in 50 (28 %) patients. Vasoreactivity testing was performed in 33 patients with idiopathic PAH. In 11 of them it was positive (33 %). In patients with a positive vasoreactivity testing, the mean pulmonary artery pressure decreased by an average of 21.8 mm Hg to the level of 26.5 mm Hg (p 0.0001), while the cardiac index increased by 31 % and reached 3.8 l · min · m–2 (p<0.1). Pulmonary vascular resistance decreased by 6.4 Wood units to the level of 2.7 Wood units (p<0.0001). In patients with a negative vasoreactivity testing, the decrease in mean pulmonary artery pressure and pulmonary vascular resistance was not statistically significant (p>0.05), and no changes in the cardiac index were detected. Conclusions. Based on the experience of our center, hemodynamic assessment using catheterization is safe and remains the diagnostic standard for PAH. Catheterization is necessary to clarify 4 parameters that are critical for the clinical profile of patients with pulmonary hypertension: right atrium pressure, pulmonary vascular resistance, cardiac output, pulmonary wedge pressure. Patients with idiopathic PAH also need to have vasoreactivity evaluated in order to predict sensitivity to calcium channel blockers therapy, the presence of which is associated with better treatment and survival outcomes.

scholarly journals Preoperative Evaluation of Pulmonary Hypertension in Lung Transplant Candidates: Echocardiography Versus Right Heart Catheterization

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tal Abu ◽  
Amos Levi ◽  
David Hasdai ◽  
Mordechai R. Kramer ◽  
Tamir Bental ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pulmonary Hypertension ◽  
Pulmonary Artery ◽  
Preoperative Evaluation ◽  
Systolic Pressure ◽  
Area Under The Curve ◽  
Right Heart Catheterization ◽  
Mean Value ◽  
Pulmonary Artery Systolic Pressure ◽  
Heart Catheterization ◽  
Right Heart

Abstract Background - Right heart catheterization (RHC) and echocardiography are both routinely used for pulmonary artery systolic pressure (PASP) assessment in lung transplantation (LT) candidates, although this is not mandated by current guidelines. We aimed to explore the correlation between PASP estimated by echocardiography to that measured by RHC, in this population in order to assess the necessity of RHC. Methods - From a retrospective registry of 393 LT candidates undergoing RHC and echocardiography during 2015-2019, patients were assessed for the presence of pulmonary hypertension (PH), defined as mean pulmonary artery pressure (mPAP) above 20 mmHg, according to two methods – echocardiography and RHC. The primary outcome was the correlation between the PASP estimated by echocardiography to that measured by RHC. Secondary outcomes were the prediction value of the echocardiographic evaluation and its accuracy. Results - The mean value of PASP estimated by echocardiography was 49.5±20.0 mmHg, compared to 42.5±18.0 mmHg measured by RHC. The correlation between the two measurements was moderate (Pearson’s correlation: r=0.609, p<0.01). Echocardiography PASP measurements were moderately discriminative to diagnose PH, with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.72 (95% CI 0.66-0.76). Echocardiographic overestimation of PASP of more than 10 mmHg was found in 35.0% of the patients, and underestimation was found in 11.6% of the patients.Conclusion - In the pre-surgical evaluation of LT candidates, echocardiographic estimation of PASP had moderate correlation and limited accuracy compared to the PASP measured by RHC. We thus recommend performing routine RHC to all LT candidates, regardless of the echocardiographic estimation of PASP.

scholarly journals Accuracy of Echocardiographic Estimates of Pulmonary Artery Pressures in Pulmonary Hypertension: Insights From the KARUM Hemodynamic Database

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ashwin Venkateshvaran ◽  
Natavan Seidova ◽  
Hande Oktay Tureli ◽  
Barbro Kjellström ◽  
Lars H Lund ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pulmonary Hypertension ◽  
Pulmonary Artery ◽  
Population Studies ◽  
Right Heart Catheterization ◽  
Right Atrial ◽  
Heart Catheterization ◽  
Limits Of Agreement ◽  
Right Heart ◽  
Minimal Bias

Abstract BACKGROUND. Accurate assessment of pulmonary artery (PA) pressures is integral to diagnosis, follow-up and therapy selection in pulmonary hypertension (PH). Despite wide utilization, the accuracy of echocardiography to estimate PA pressures has been debated. We aimed to evaluate echocardiographic accuracy to estimate right heart catheterization (RHC) based PA pressures in a large, dual-centre hemodynamic database. METHODS. Consecutive PH referrals that underwent comprehensive echocardiography within 3 hours of clinically indicated right heart catheterization were enrolled. Subjects with absent or severe, free-flowing tricuspid regurgitation (TR) were excluded. Accuracy was defined as mean bias between echocardiographic and invasive measurements on Bland-Altman analysis for the cohort and estimate difference within ±10mmHg of invasive measurements for individual diagnosis. RESULTS. In 419 subjects, echocardiographic PA systolic and mean pressures demonstrated minimal bias with invasive measurements (+2.4 and +1.9mmHg respectively) but displayed wide limits of agreement (-20 to +25 and -14 to +18mmHg respectively) and frequently misclassified subjects. Recommendation-based right atrial pressure (RAP) demonstrated poor precision and was falsely elevated in 32% of individual cases. Applying a fixed, median RAP to echocardiographic estimates resulted in relatively lower bias between modalities when assessing PA systolic (+1.4mmHg; 95% limits of agreement +25 to –22mmHg) and PA mean pressures (+1.4mmHg; 95% limits of agreement +19 to -16mmHg).CONCLUSIONS. Echocardiography accurately represents invasive PA pressures for population studies but may be misleading for individual diagnosis owing to modest precision and frequent misclassification. Recommendation-based estimates of RAPmean may not necessarily contribute to greater accuracy of PA pressure estimates.

Echocardiographic probability of pulmonary hypertension: a validation study

2022 ◽  
pp. 2102548
Author(s):  
Michele D'Alto ◽  
Marco Di Maio ◽  
Emanuele Romeo ◽  
Paola Argiento ◽  
Ettore Blasi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pulmonary Hypertension ◽  
Right Heart Catheterization ◽  
Right Atrial ◽  
Pulmonary Vascular Disease ◽  
Heart Catheterization ◽  
Right Heart ◽  
Basal Diameter ◽  
Acceleration Time ◽  
Eccentricity Index ◽  
Current Guidelines

BackgroundAccording to current guidelines, the diagnosis of pulmonary hypertension (PH) relies on echocardiographic probability followed by right heart catheterization. How echocardiography predicts PH recently re-defined by a mean pulmonary artery pressure (mPAP) >20 mmHg instead of ≥25 mmHg and pulmonary vascular disease defined by a pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR) >3 or >2 Wood units has not been established.MethodsA total of 278 patients referred for PH underwent a comprehensive echocardiography followed by a right heart catheterization. Fifteen patients (5.4%) were excluded because of insufficient quality echocardiography.ResultsWith PH defined by a mPAP >20 mmHg, 23 patients had no PH, 146 had pre-capillary and 94 post-capillary PH. At univariate analysis, maximum velocity of tricuspid regurgitation (TRV) ≥2.9 and ≤3.4 m s−1, left ventricle (LV) eccentricity index >1.1, right ventricle (RV) outflow tract (OT) notching or acceleration time <105 ms, RV-LV basal diameter >1 and PA diameter predicted PH, whereas inferior vena cava diameter and right atrial area did not. At multivariable analysis, only TRV ≥2.9 m s−1 independently predicted PH. Additional independent prediction of PVR >3 Wood units was offered by LV eccentricity index >1.1 and RVOT acceleration time <105 ms and/or notching, but with no improvement of optimal combination of specificity and sensibility or positive prediction.ConclusionsEchocardiography as recommended in current guidelines can be used to assess the probability of re-defined PH in a referral center. However, the added value of indirect signs is modest and sufficient quality echocardiographic signals may not be recovered in some patients.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document