P3730Left atrial appendage perimeter measurement by cardiac CT is superior to transesophageal echocardiography for Watchman device sizing

2019 ◽  
Vol 40 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
L Seibolt ◽  
D Verma ◽  
W Mulroy ◽  
A Loli
Keyword(s):  
Left Atrial ◽  
Cardiac Ct ◽  
Left Atrial Appendage ◽  
Atrial Appendage ◽  
Current Standard ◽  
Landing Zone ◽  
Pearson Coefficient ◽  
Watchman Device ◽  
Very High ◽  
Device Size

Abstract Background Left atrial appendage occlusion with Watchman device traditionally relies on accurate left atrial appendage (LAA) ostium diameter measurement by 2D or 3D transesophageal echocardiogram (TEE). Alternate methods of ostium measurement including area-derived diameter and perimeter-derived diameter using cardiac computed tomography (CT) have been proposed. Purpose We aim to use CT technology with an advanced medical imaging application to measure LAA ostium perimeter for improved pre-procedural device sizing. Methods We performed a retrospective analysis of 92 patients with atrial fibrillation (Afib) who underwent Watchman implantation with pre-procedural TEE and cardiac CT between May 2015 and December 2018. LAA characteristics including ostial or landing zone perimeter, minimum and maximum diameters were acquired utilizing 3mensio Structural Heart Imaging Program. Proposed Watchman device size was estimated utilizing ostium perimeter by CT and compared to the current standard utilizing ostium diameter by 2D-TEE. Both measurements were then compared to actual implanted Watchman device size which met the P.A.S.S. criteria of position, anchor, size and seal. Results Watchman device sizing based on novel LAA landing zone perimeter size by CT had a very high correlation with the actual implanted Watchman size (Pearson coefficient r=0.94, p<0.001). Traditional TEE based Watchman sizing only had a modest correlation with the implanted Watchman size (Pearson coefficient r=0.66, p<0.001). CT predicted Watchman size had a significantly higher agreement compared to current standard TEE based sizing (93.4% vs 47.8%), inter-rater agreement was very high for CT based Watchman sizing compared to current standard TEE based sizing (Cohen's kappa = 0.91 vs Cohen's kappa = 0.32, p<0.001, p<0.001 respectively). Bland-Altman analysis also showed better correlation with CT based sizing compared to TEE (see Figure 1). Figure 1 Conclusion CT LAA perimeter sizing is superior to the current standard TEE based Watchman sizing. Larger, multi-center studies may be necessary to further validate our results.

scholarly journals Left atrial appendage perimeter ostium evaluation by cardiac CT utilizing 3mensio technology for watchman implantation

2021 ◽  
Vol 42 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
A Loli ◽  
J Rodriguez
Keyword(s):  
Left Atrial ◽  
Left Atrial Appendage ◽  
Cardiac Computed Tomography ◽  
Atrial Appendage ◽  
Current Standard ◽  
Cohen’S Kappa ◽  
Landing Zone ◽  
Cohen's Kappa ◽  
Pearson Coefficient ◽  
Device Size

Abstract Background Left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO) with Watchman device traditionally relies on accurate left atrial appendage ostium diameter measurement by 2D or 3D transesophageal echocardiogram (TEE). Alternate methods of ostium measurement including area-derived diameter and perimeter-derived diameter using cardiac computed tomography (CT) have been proposed. Methods We performed a retrospective analysis of 92 patients with atrial fibrillation (Afib) who underwent LAAO with WATCHMAN implantation with pre-procedural TEE and CT between May 2015 and December 2018. LAA characteristics including ostial or landing zone perimeter, minimum and maximum diameters were acquired utilizing 3mensio Structural Heart Imaging Program. Proposed device size was estimated utilizing ostium perimeter by CT and compared to the current standard utilizing ostium diameter by 2D-TEE. Both measurements were then compared to actual final device size that satisfying release criteria. Results CT had a very high correlation with the actual implanted device size (Pearson coefficient r=0.94, p&lt;0.001), while TEE based sizing had a lower correlation (Pearson coefficient r=0.66, p&lt;0.001). CT predicted size had a significantly higher agreement compared to standard TEE based sizing (93.4% vs 47.8%), and higher interrater agreement (Cohen's kappa = 0.91 vs Cohen's kappa = 0.32, p&lt;0.001, p&lt;0.001 respectively). Bland-Altman analysis also showed better correlation with CT-based sizing. Procedural complications were 0, and 0 patients had a leak recorded at 45-days post implant. Conclusion CCT LAA perimeter sizing is superior to the current standard TEE based Watchman sizing. Larger, multi-center studies may be necessary to further validate results. FUNDunding Acknowledgement Type of funding sources: None. 3mensio after CT upload

scholarly journals Pre-procedural Determination of Device Size in Left Atrial Appendage Occlusion Using Three-dimensional Cardiac Computed Tomography

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Iksung Cho ◽  
William D. Kim ◽  
Oh Hyun Lee ◽  
Min Jae Cha ◽  
Jiwon Seo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Computed Tomography ◽  
Left Atrial ◽  
Cardiac Ct ◽  
Left Atrial Appendage ◽  
Cardiac Computed Tomography ◽  
Three Dimensional ◽  
Atrial Appendage ◽  
Landing Zone ◽  
Left Atrial Appendage Occlusion ◽  
Device Size

Abstract Background: The two-dimensional-based LAAO size prediction system using transesophageal echocardiography is limited by the complex structure of the left atrial appendage (LAA). The LAA anatomy can be evaluated more precisely using three-dimensional images from cardiac CT; however, a CT-based sizing method has not been established. We aimed to assess the accuracy of measurements derived from cardiac computed tomography (CT) images for selecting left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO) devices.Methods: We retrospectively reviewed 62 patients with Amplatzer Cardiac Plug and Amulet LAAO devices who underwent implantation from 2017 to 2020. The minimal, maximal, average, area-derived, and perimeter-derived diameters of the LAA landing zone were measured using CT-based images. Predicted device sizes using sizing charts were compared with actual successfully implanted device sizes.Results: The mean size of implanted devices was 27.1 ± 3.7 mm. The perimeter-derived diameter predicted device size most accurately (mean error = -0.8 ± 2.4 mm). All other parameters showed significantly larger error (mean error; minimal diameter = -4.9 ± 3.3 mm, maximal diameter = 1.0 ± 2.9 mm, average diameter = -1.6 ± 2.6 mm, area-derived diameter = -2.0 ± 2.6 mm) than the perimeter-derived diameter (all p for difference <0.05). The error for other parameters were larger in cases with more eccentrically-shaped landing zones, while the perimeter-derived diameter had minor error regardless of eccentricity. When oversizing was used, all parameters showed significant disagreement.Conclusions: The perimeter-derived diameter on cardiac CT images provided the most accurate estimation of LAAO device size regardless of landing zone eccentricity. Oversizing was unnecessary when using cardiac CT to predict an accurate LAAO size.

scholarly journals Pre-procedural determination of device size in left atrial appendage occlusion using three-dimensional cardiac computed tomography

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Iksung Cho ◽  
William D. Kim ◽  
Oh Hyun Lee ◽  
Min Jae Cha ◽  
Jiwon Seo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Computed Tomography ◽  
Left Atrial ◽  
Cardiac Ct ◽  
Left Atrial Appendage ◽  
Cardiac Computed Tomography ◽  
Three Dimensional ◽  
Atrial Appendage ◽  
Landing Zone ◽  
Mean Error ◽  
Device Size

AbstractThe complex structure of the left atrial appendage (LAA) brings limitations to the two-dimensional-based LAA occlusion (LAAO) size prediction system using transesophageal echocardiography. The LAA anatomy can be evaluated more precisely using three-dimensional images from cardiac computed tomography (CT); however, there is lack of data regarding which parameter to choose from CT-based images during pre-procedural planning of LAAO. We aimed to assess the accuracy of measurements derived from cardiac CT images for selecting LAAO devices. We retrospectively reviewed 62 patients with Amplatzer Cardiac Plug and Amulet LAAO devices who underwent implantation from 2017 to 2020. The minimal, maximal, average, area-derived, and perimeter-derived diameters of the LAA landing zone were measured using CT-based images. Predicted device sizes using sizing charts were compared with actual successfully implanted device sizes. The mean size of implanted devices was 27.1 ± 3.7 mm. The perimeter-derived diameter predicted device size most accurately (mean error = − 0.8 ± 2.4 mm). All other parameters showed significantly larger error (mean error; minimal diameter = − 4.9 ± 3.3 mm, maximal diameter = 1.0 ± 2.9 mm, average diameter = − 1.6 ± 2.6 mm, area-derived diameter = − 2.0 ± 2.6 mm) than the perimeter-derived diameter (all p for difference < 0.05). The error for other parameters were larger in cases with more eccentrically-shaped landing zones, while the perimeter-derived diameter had minor error regardless of eccentricity. When oversizing was used, all parameters showed significant disagreement. The perimeter-derived diameter on cardiac CT images provided the most accurate estimation of LAAO device size regardless of landing zone eccentricity. Oversizing was unnecessary when using cardiac CT to predict an accurate LAAO size.

Abstract 17421: Use of a Novel Septal Occluder Device for Left Atrial Appendage Closure in Patients With Post-Surgical and Post-Lariat Leaks or Anatomies Unsuitable for Conventional Percutaneous Occlusion

Circulation ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 142 (Suppl_3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Domenico G Della Rocca ◽  
Rodney Horton ◽  
Nicola Tarantino ◽  
Luigi Di Biase ◽  
Carola Gianni ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Left Atrial ◽  
Left Atrial Appendage ◽  
Systemic Circulation ◽  
Atrial Appendage ◽  
Landing Zone ◽  
Septal Occluder Device ◽  
Watchman Device ◽  
Occluder Device ◽  
Procedural Complications ◽  
Laa Closure

Introduction: Interventional therapies aiming at excluding the left atrial appendage (LAA) from systemic circulation have been established as a valid alternative to oral anticoagulation (OAC) in patients at high thromboembolic (TE) risk. However, their efficacy on stroke prophylaxis may be compromised owing to incomplete LAA closure. Additionally, the need for an alternative TE prevention may remain unmet in patients with contraindications to OAC whose appendage anatomy is unsuitable for some conventional devices commercially available. Hypothesis: We aimed at evaluating the feasibility of LAA closure with the novel Gore® Cardioform Septal Occluder (CSO) in patients with incomplete appendage ligation or anatomical features which do not meet the manufacturer’s requirements for Watchman deployment. Methods: Twenty-one consecutive patients (mean age: 72±6 years; 85.7% males; CHA 2 DS 2 -VASc: 4.5±1.4; HAS-BLED: 3.6±1.0) were included. Trans-esophageal echocardiography (TEE) was performed within 2 months to assess for residual LAA patency. Results: Fourteen patients had incomplete LAA closure following surgical (n=6) or Lariat ligation (n=8). In 7 patients with an appendage anatomy unsuitable for Watchman deployment, the mean maximal landing zone size and LAA depth were 14.4±1.3mm and 18.6±2.8mm. Successful CSO deployment was achieved in all patients. No peri-procedural complications were documented.Procedure and fluoroscopy times were 46±13min and 14±5min. Follow-up TEE after 58±9 days revealed complete LAA closure in all patients. Conclusions: Transcatheter LAA closure via a CSO device might be a valid alternative in patients with residual leaks following failed appendage ligation or whose LAA anatomy does not meet the minimal anatomical criteria to accommodate a Watchman device.

scholarly journals Multimodality Imaging for Optimal Device-size Selection During Percutaneous Left Atrial Appendage Closure in Thai Population

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sakolwat Montrivade ◽  
Vorarit Lertsuwunseri ◽  
Monravee Tumkosit ◽  
Suphot Srimahach
Keyword(s):  
Left Atrial ◽  
Left Atrial Appendage ◽  
Atrial Appendage ◽  
Landing Zone ◽  
Zone Diameter ◽  
Size Selection ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Implanted Device ◽  
Device Size ◽  
Laa Closure

Abstract Background: Optimal device size selection is crucial for percutaneous left atrial appendage (LAA) closure. Transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) is the standard imaging technique for LAA assessment, however there are discrepancies among different imaging modalities. We aimed to evaluate the agreement between device size and LAA size measured by three methods: multi-detector cardiac computed tomography (MDCT), TEE, and angiography. Methods: Patients who underwent percutaneous LAA closure at King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital from 2012 to 2020 were included in this study. MDCT, TEE and angiography were reviewed. LAA ostial diameter, landing zone diameter and maximal depth from each imaging modality was measured and analyzed. Agreement between landing zone diameter and implanted device size was assessed.Results: We reported on 61 consecutive patients who underwent percutaneous LAA closure. The mean age of patients was 74.0 ± 8.4 years. The mean CHA2DS2 score, CHA2DS2-VASc score and HAS-BLED score were 2.8 ± 1.4, 4.6 ± 1.8 and 2.6 ± 1.0, respectively. Device implantation was successful in all patients (100%). Two different LAA closure devices were used: Watchman (n = 43, 70.5%) and Omega (n = 18, 29.5%). Maximum landing zone diameter measured by MDCT scan, TEE and angiography were 23.4 ± 3.9 mm, 22.2 ± 4.8 mm and 22.7 ± 3.5 mm, respectively. MDCT measurement was significantly larger than TEE measurement (p = 0.015) and closer to implanted device size compared with TEE and angiography. The difference between landing zone diameter measured by CT scan and device size was -1.65 ± 2.0 mm compared with -4.8 ± 4.6 mm for TEE and -4.3 ± 3.3 mm for angiography.Conclusion: MDCT sizing of LAA results in larger measurement than TEE. Routine implementation of MDCT sizing may improve procedural success with more accurate device size selection.

scholarly journals 475 Is left atrial appendage device compression rate a predictor of incomplete occlusion in patients undergoing watchman device implantation?

2021 ◽  
Vol 23 (Supplement_G) ◽  
Author(s):  
Michele Magnocavallo ◽  
Domenico Giovanni Della Rocca ◽  
Carlo Lavalle ◽  
Cristina Chimenti ◽  
Gianni Carola ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Left Atrial ◽  
Left Atrial Appendage ◽  
Imaging Modality ◽  
Accurate Method ◽  
Atrial Appendage ◽  
Device Implantation ◽  
Watchman Device ◽  
Device Size ◽  
Original Device

Abstract Aims Transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) is a standard peri-procedural imaging modality in patients undergoing percutaneous left atrial appendage (LAA) occlusion. An accurate device sizing is pivotal to assess stability and achieve successful closure. In this prospective study, we sought to evaluate the correlation between Watchman device compression rates (DCRs) and risk of incomplete LAA occlusion at follow-up in patients undergoing Watchman device implantation. Methods and results Two-dimensional TEE via a commercially available transducer (Vivid, Philips) was performed during the procedure and within 3 months after the procedure. LAA size, morphology, and DCRs [(original device size—size after deployment)/original device size; %] were assessed in a mid-oesophageal view at 0°, 45°, 90° and 135°, according to company recommendations. Residual leaks ≥ 3 mm were classified as significant. Between 2016 and 2018, 116 patients underwent LAA occlusion with a Watchman device at our institution. The mean age was 74 ± 9 years and 60.4% (n = 70) were males. The average CHA2DS2-VASc and HAS-BLED scores were 4.7 ± 1.7 and 2.5 ± 1.1, respectively. The final device size was 21 mm in 11 (9.5%) patients, 24 mm in 28 (24.1), 27 mm in 27 (23.3%), 30 mm in 26 (22.4%), and 33 mm in 24 (20.7). At follow-up TEE, 16 (13.8%) patients were found to have a significant (≥3 mm) residual leak. The average DCRs measured at different angles in patients with and without leak were not significantly different (24 ± 8% vs. 26 ± 7% at 0°, P = 0.47; 23 ± 9% vs. 25 ± 7% at 45°, P = 0.58; 23 ± 8% vs. 23 ± 6% at 90°, P = 0.61; 22 ± 8% vs. 21 ± 7% at 135°, P = 0.61). At receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis, the areas under the curve to discriminate between patients with/without leak were 0.58, 0.57, 0.55, and 0.46 for DCRs measured at 0°, 45°, 90°, and 135° angles. Conclusions Peri-procedural assessment of DCRs does not appear to be an accurate method to predict LAA complete occlusion in patients undergoing Watchman device implantation.

Cardiac CT Angiography (CCTA) predicts left atrial appendage occluder device size and procedure outcome

2017 ◽  
Vol 33 (5) ◽  
pp. 739-747 ◽  
Author(s):  
Orly Goitein ◽  
Noam Fink ◽  
Ilan Hay ◽  
Elio Di Segni ◽  
Victor Guetta ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ct Angiography ◽  
Left Atrial ◽  
Cardiac Ct ◽  
Left Atrial Appendage ◽  
Atrial Appendage ◽  
Cardiac Ct Angiography ◽  
Occluder Device ◽  
Device Size

scholarly journals PERIDEVICE LEAK AND DEVICE SIZING IN PATIENTS RECEIVING LEFT ATRIAL APPENDAGE CLOSURE WITH THE WATCHMAN DEVICE

2021 ◽  
Vol 77 (18) ◽  
pp. 955
Author(s):  
Lauren Sharan Ranard ◽  
Elena Donald ◽  
Shmuel Chen ◽  
Omar Khalique ◽  
Nadira Hamid ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Left Atrial ◽  
Left Atrial Appendage ◽  
Atrial Appendage ◽  
Left Atrial Appendage Closure ◽  
Watchman Device

scholarly journals Safety and effects of volume loading during transesophageal echocardiography in the pre-procedural work-up for left atrial appendage closure

2021 ◽  
Vol 19 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Afonso B. Freitas-Ferraz ◽  
Mathieu Bernier ◽  
Kim O’Connor ◽  
Jonathan Beaudoin ◽  
Jean Champagne ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Transesophageal Echocardiography ◽  
Left Atrial ◽  
Left Atrial Appendage ◽  
Atrial Appendage ◽  
Maximum Diameter ◽  
Volume Loading ◽  
Fluid Bolus ◽  
Work Up ◽  
Device Size ◽  
Laa Closure

Abstract Background In patients undergoing left atrial appendage (LAA) closure, an accurate sizing of the LAA is key to optimize device sizing, procedural success and reduce complications. Previous studies have shown that intraprocedural volume loading increases LAA dimensions and improves device sizing. However, the safety and effects on LAA and device sizing of administering a fluid bolus during pre-procedural transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) are unknown. The aim of this study was to determine the safety and impact on LAA dimensions and device sizing of an intravenous (IV) fluid bolus administered during TEE in the setting of the pre-procedural work-up for LAA closure. Methods The study included a total of 72 patients who underwent TEE to assess suitability for LAAC and received a 500 ml IV bolus of normal saline. The LAA landing zone (LZ) and depth were measured by TEE before and after volume loading, and these measurements were used to predict the device size implanted during a subsequent percutaneous LAAC procedure. Results There were no complications associated with volume loading. The baseline mean LZ was 19.6 ± 3.6 mm at 90o, and 20.2 ± 4.1 mm at 135o. Following fluid bolus, the maximum diameter increased 1.5 ± 1.0 mm at 90o (p<0.001), and 1.3 ± 1.0 mm at 135o (p<0.001). The baseline mean depth of the LAA was 26.5 ± 5.5 mm at 90o, and 23.9 ± 5.8 mm at 135o. After fluid bolus, the mean depth increased by 1.5 ± 1.8 mm (p<0.001) and 1.6 ± 2.0 (p<0.001), at 90o and 135o, respectively. Sizing based on post-bolus measurements of the LZ significantly improved the agreement with the final device size selection during the procedure in 71.0% of cases (vs. 42.0% with pre-bolus measurements). Conclusions Volume loading during ambulatory TEE as part of the pre-procedural work-up of LAAC is safe and significantly increases LAA dimensions. This strategy may become the new standard, particularly in centers performing LAAC with no TEE guidance, as it improves LAA sizing and more accurately predicts the final device size.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document