1320Effectiveness of atrial flutter ablation line selection using SOUNDSTAR catheter

Abstract Background Cavotricuspid isthmus (CTI) ablation for atrial flutter (AFL) shows a high success rate and effective for patients. However, operators experience difficulties in CTI ablation in some cases and need additional ablation for repeated recurrence. We investigated whether the SOUNDSTAR® (Biosense. Webster, Diamond Barr, CA, USA) catheter would be effective to select a CTI line of high therapeutic effect. Methods We have investigated the anatomy of around CTI by SOUNDSTAR® catheter and decided the CTI line using the anatomical information in AFL ablation (Figure1). We assumed two CTI lines of medial and lateral line. Medial CTI (M-CTI) line was more common and shorter line. Lateral CTI (L-CTI) line was uncommon and slightly longer line. We use 3.5mm tip catheter with NxT steerable introducer. The target Ablation Index (AI) was 400, and the target VisTtag™ interval was 6 mm or less. Results A total 30 of AFL ablated cases were investigated retrospectively. We surveyed 15 cases in M-CTI group and 15 cases in L-CTI group. Comparing the length of CTI in all cases, the length of M-CTI line was shorter than L-CTI line (M-CTI 32.1 ± 6.6mm vs. L-CTI 38.4 ± 8.3mm, n = 30, p <0.01). The atrial wall thickness of midsection and tricuspid valve (TV) side were thicker in M-CTI line (Midsection: M-CTI 4.0 ± 1.2mm vs. L-CTI 3.3 ± 0.8mm, n = 30, p <0.05, TV side: M-CTI 5.4 ± 1.4mm vs. L-CTI 4.3 ± 1.1mm, n = 30, p <0.05,). There was no difference in the required number of points to complete initial line (M-CTI 8.4 ± 1.6 vs. L-CTI 8.1 ± 1.7, n = 15, ns). Eustachian ridge in IVC side was thicker and higher in the M-CTI group (3.4 ± 3.3mm vs. 0.9 ± 1.9mm, n =30, p <0.01) and ablation on the Eustachian ridge showed instability of catheter placement. A lot of RF delivery was required on Eustachian ridge in M-CTI (2.6 ± 0.6 vs. 2.1 ± 0.7, n =15, p <0.05) and AI had resulted lower in M-CTI (351 ± 42.8 vs. 381 ± 27.1, n =15, p <0.05). Recurrence is more common in M-CTI group (9/15, 60% vs. 3/15, 20%). Recurrence sites in M-CTI group were distributed ((IVC side 3/9 (33%), midsection 5/9 (56%), TV side 5/9 (56%)) and multiple recurrences occurred in 3/9 (33%). Recurrence sites in L-CTI were only midsection of CTI (3/3, 100%). Conclusions CTI ablation at the shorter distance M-CTI, which is commonly selected, resulted in more recurrences due to the unevenness including Eustachian ridge and the myocardium thickness. However, ablation at slightly longer L-CTI line showed lower recurrence and effective for CTI ablation. Abstract Figure 1

Download Full-text

Impact of cavotricuspid isthmus depth on the ablation index for successful first-pass typical atrial flutter ablation

Scientific Reports ◽

10.1038/s41598-021-01846-7 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 11 (1) ◽

Author(s):

Manabu Kashiwagi ◽

Akio Kuroi ◽

Yosuke Katayama ◽

Kosei Terada ◽

Suwako Fujita ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Success Rate ◽

Atrial Flutter ◽

Vena Cava ◽

Receiver Operating Curve ◽

Cavotricuspid Isthmus ◽

Ablation Index ◽

Typical Atrial Flutter ◽

Linear Ablation ◽

First Pass ◽

Atrial Flutter Ablation

AbstractCavotricuspid isthmus (CTI) linear ablation has been established as the treatment for typical atrial flutter. Recently, ablation index (AI) has emerged as a novel marker for estimating ablation lesions. We investigated the relationship between CTI depth and ablation parameters on the procedural results of typical atrial flutter ablation. A total of 107 patients who underwent CTI ablation were retrospectively enrolled in this study. All patients underwent computed tomography before catheter ablation. From the receiver-operating curve, the best cut-off value of CTI depth was < 4.1 mm to predict first-pass success. Although the average AI was not different between deep CTI (DC; CTI depth ≥ 4.1) and shallow CTI (SC; CTI depth < 4.1), DC required a longer ablation time and showed a lower first-pass success rate (p < 0.01). In addition, the catheter inversion technique was more frequently required in the DC (p < 0.01). The lowest AI sites of the first-pass CTI line were determined in both the ventricular (2/3 segment of CTI) and inferior vena cava (IVC, 1/3 segment of CTI) sides. The best cut-off values of the weakest AIs at the ventricular and IVC sides for predicting first-pass success were > 420 and > 386, respectively. Among patients with these cut-off values, the first-pass success rate was 89% in the SC and 50% in the DC (p < 0.01). Although ablation parameters were not significantly different, the first-pass success rate was lower in the DC than in the SC. Further investigation might be required for better outcomes in deep CTIs.

Download Full-text

Impact of Cavotricuspid Isthmus Anatomy on the Ablation Index For Successful First-Pass Typical Atrial Flutter Ablation

10.21203/rs.3.rs-530268/v1 ◽

2021 ◽

Author(s):

Manabu Kashiwagi ◽

Akio Kuroi ◽

Yosuke Katayama ◽

Kosei Terada ◽

Suwako Fujita ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Success Rate ◽

Atrial Flutter ◽

Receiver Operating Curve ◽

Cavotricuspid Isthmus ◽

Ablation Index ◽

Typical Atrial Flutter ◽

Linear Ablation ◽

First Pass ◽

The Relationship ◽

Atrial Flutter Ablation

Abstract Cavotricuspid isthmus (CTI) linear ablation has been established as the treatment for typical atrial flutter. Recently, ablation index (AI) has emerged as a novel marker for estimating ablation lesions. We investigated the relationship between CTI anatomy and ablation parameters. In addition, we focused on the influence of AI on the procedural results of typical atrial flutter ablation. A total of 107 patients who underwent CTI ablation were retrospectively enrolled in this study. All patients underwent computed tomography before catheter ablation. From the receiver-operating curve, the best cut-off value of CTI depth was < 4.1 mm to predict first-pass success. The patients were divided into two groups according to the CTI depth: the concave group (CG) and straight group (SG). Although the average AI was not different between both groups, the CG required a longer ablation time and showed a lower first-pass success rate (p < 0.01). In addition, the catheter inversion technique was more frequently required in the CG (p < 0.01). The best cut-off values of the weakest AIs at the anterior and posterior lesions for predicting first-pass success were >420 and >386, respectively. Among patients with these cut-off values, the first-pass success rate was 88% in the SG and 50% in the CG (p < 0.01). Although ablation parameters were not significantly different, the first-pass success rate was lower in the CG than in the SG. AI-guided CTI may be useful in straight CTIs, but a modified approach might be required for concave CTIs.

Download Full-text