scholarly journals Multitrait Least Squares for Quantitative Trait Loci Detection

Genetics ◽  
2000 ◽  
Vol 156 (2) ◽  
pp. 899-911 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sara A Knott ◽  
Chris S Haley
Keyword(s):  
Quantitative Trait Loci ◽  
Qtl Mapping ◽  
Least Squares ◽  
Quantitative Trait ◽  
Testing Procedure ◽  
Mapping Method ◽  
Multiple Trait ◽  
Formal Testing ◽  
Pleiotropic Qtl ◽  
Location Estimate

Abstract A multiple-trait QTL mapping method using least squares is described. It is presented as an extension of a single-trait method for use with three-generation, outbred pedigrees. The multiple-trait framework allows formal testing of whether the same QTL affects more than one trait (i.e., a pleiotropic QTL) or whether more than one linked QTL are segregating. Several approaches to the testing procedure are presented and their suitability discussed. The performance of the method is investigated by simulation. As previously found, multitrait analyses increase the power to detect a pleiotropic QTL and the precision of its location estimate. With enough information, discrimination between alternative genetic models is possible.

scholarly journals Precision mapping of quantitative trait loci.

Genetics ◽  
1994 ◽  
Vol 136 (4) ◽  
pp. 1457-1468 ◽  
Author(s):  
Z B Zeng
Keyword(s):  
Quantitative Trait Loci ◽  
Qtl Mapping ◽  
Quantitative Trait ◽  
Interval Mapping ◽  
Mapping Method ◽  
Search Problem ◽  
Test Statistic ◽  
Advantages And Disadvantages ◽  
A Genome ◽  
Trait Loci

Abstract Adequate separation of effects of possible multiple linked quantitative trait loci (QTLs) on mapping QTLs is the key to increasing the precision of QTL mapping. A new method of QTL mapping is proposed and analyzed in this paper by combining interval mapping with multiple regression. The basis of the proposed method is an interval test in which the test statistic on a marker interval is made to be unaffected by QTLs located outside a defined interval. This is achieved by fitting other genetic markers in the statistical model as a control when performing interval mapping. Compared with the current QTL mapping method (i.e., the interval mapping method which uses a pair or two pairs of markers for mapping QTLs), this method has several advantages. (1) By confining the test to one region at a time, it reduces a multiple dimensional search problem (for multiple QTLs) to a one dimensional search problem. (2) By conditioning linked markers in the test, the sensitivity of the test statistic to the position of individual QTLs is increased, and the precision of QTL mapping can be improved. (3) By selectively and simultaneously using other markers in the analysis, the efficiency of QTL mapping can be also improved. The behavior of the test statistic under the null hypothesis and appropriate critical value of the test statistic for an overall test in a genome are discussed and analyzed. A simulation study of QTL mapping is also presented which illustrates the utility, properties, advantages and disadvantages of the method.

scholarly journals On the Differences Between Maximum Likelihood and Regression Interval Mapping in the Analysis of Quantitative Trait Loci

Genetics ◽  
2000 ◽  
Vol 156 (2) ◽  
pp. 855-865 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chen-Hung Kao
Keyword(s):  
Quantitative Trait Loci ◽  
Maximum Likelihood ◽  
Qtl Mapping ◽  
Quantitative Trait ◽  
Mean Squared Error ◽  
Interval Mapping ◽  
Size Difference ◽  
Ratio Test ◽  
Trait Loci ◽  
Variance Explained

AbstractThe differences between maximum-likelihood (ML) and regression (REG) interval mapping in the analysis of quantitative trait loci (QTL) are investigated analytically and numerically by simulation. The analytical investigation is based on the comparison of the solution sets of the ML and REG methods in the estimation of QTL parameters. Their differences are found to relate to the similarity between the conditional posterior and conditional probabilities of QTL genotypes and depend on several factors, such as the proportion of variance explained by QTL, relative QTL position in an interval, interval size, difference between the sizes of QTL, epistasis, and linkage between QTL. The differences in mean squared error (MSE) of the estimates, likelihood-ratio test (LRT) statistics in testing parameters, and power of QTL detection between the two methods become larger as (1) the proportion of variance explained by QTL becomes higher, (2) the QTL locations are positioned toward the middle of intervals, (3) the QTL are located in wider marker intervals, (4) epistasis between QTL is stronger, (5) the difference between QTL effects becomes larger, and (6) the positions of QTL get closer in QTL mapping. The REG method is biased in the estimation of the proportion of variance explained by QTL, and it may have a serious problem in detecting closely linked QTL when compared to the ML method. In general, the differences between the two methods may be minor, but can be significant when QTL interact or are closely linked. The ML method tends to be more powerful and to give estimates with smaller MSEs and larger LRT statistics. This implies that ML interval mapping can be more accurate, precise, and powerful than REG interval mapping. The REG method is faster in computation, especially when the number of QTL considered in the model is large. Recognizing the factors affecting the differences between REG and ML interval mapping can help an efficient strategy, using both methods in QTL mapping to be outlined.

scholarly journals Time-Related Mapping of Quantitative Trait Loci Underlying Tiller Number in Rice

Genetics ◽  
1999 ◽  
Vol 151 (1) ◽  
pp. 297-303 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wei-Ren Wu ◽  
Wei-Ming Li ◽  
Ding-Zhong Tang ◽  
Hao-Ran Lu ◽  
A J Worland
Keyword(s):  
Quantitative Trait Loci ◽  
Quantitative Trait ◽  
Composite Interval Mapping ◽  
Interval Mapping ◽  
Tiller Number ◽  
Multiple Trait ◽  
Phenotypic Data ◽  
Recombinant Inbred Population ◽  
Trait Loci ◽  
Final Observation

Abstract Using time-related phenotypic data, methods of composite interval mapping and multiple-trait composite interval mapping based on least squares were applied to map quantitative trait loci (QTL) underlying the development of tiller number in rice. A recombinant inbred population and a corresponding saturated molecular marker linkage map were constructed for the study. Tiller number was recorded every 4 or 5 days for a total of seven times starting at 20 days after sowing. Five QTL were detected on chromosomes 1, 3, and 5. These QTL explained more than half of the genetic variance at the final observation. All the QTL displayed an S-shaped expression curve. Three QTL reached their highest expression rates during active tillering stage, while the other two QTL achieved this either before or after the active tillering stage.

Bayesian Mapping of Multiple Quantitative Trait Loci From Incomplete Inbred Line Cross Data

Genetics ◽  
1998 ◽  
Vol 148 (3) ◽  
pp. 1373-1388
Author(s):  
Mikko J Sillanpää ◽  
Elja Arjas
Keyword(s):  
Quantitative Trait Loci ◽  
Quantitative Trait ◽  
Composite Interval Mapping ◽  
Backcross Progeny ◽  
Random Variable ◽  
Interval Mapping ◽  
Mapping Method ◽  
Structure Mapping ◽  
Standard Interval ◽  
Trait Loci

Abstract A novel fine structure mapping method for quantitative traits is presented. It is based on Bayesian modeling and inference, treating the number of quantitative trait loci (QTLs) as an unobserved random variable and using ideas similar to composite interval mapping to account for the effects of QTLs in other chromosomes. The method is introduced for inbred lines and it can be applied also in situations involving frequent missing genotypes. We propose that two new probabilistic measures be used to summarize the results from the statistical analysis: (1) the (posterior) QTL-intensity, for estimating the number of QTLs in a chromosome and for localizing them into some particular chromosomal regions, and (2) the location wise (posterior) distributions of the phenotypic effects of the QTLs. Both these measures will be viewed as functions of the putative QTL locus, over the marker range in the linkage group. The method is tested and compared with standard interval and composite interval mapping techniques by using simulated backcross progeny data. It is implemented as a software package. Its initial version is freely available for research purposes under the name Multimapper at URL http://www.rni.helsinki.fi/~mjs.

scholarly journals A Rank-Based Nonparametric Method for Mapping Quantitative Trait Loci in Outbred Half-Sib Pedigrees: Application to Milk Production in a Granddaughter Design

Genetics ◽  
1998 ◽  
Vol 149 (3) ◽  
pp. 1547-1555 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wouter Coppieters ◽  
Alexandre Kvasz ◽  
Frédéric Farnir ◽  
Juan-Jose Arranz ◽  
Bernard Grisart ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Quantitative Trait Loci ◽  
Quantitative Trait ◽  
Real Data ◽  
Interval Mapping ◽  
Mapping Method ◽  
Residual Variance ◽  
Data Set ◽  
Wilcoxon Rank Sum Test ◽  
Holstein Friesian ◽  
Trait Loci

Abstract We describe the development of a multipoint nonparametric quantitative trait loci mapping method based on the Wilcoxon rank-sum test applicable to outbred half-sib pedigrees. The method has been evaluated on a simulated dataset and its efficiency compared with interval mapping by using regression. It was shown that the rank-based approach is slightly inferior to regression when the residual variance is homoscedastic normal; however, in three out of four other scenarios envisaged, i.e., residual variance heteroscedastic normal, homoscedastic skewed, and homoscedastic positively kurtosed, the latter outperforms the former one. Both methods were applied to a real data set analyzing the effect of bovine chromosome 6 on milk yield and composition by using a 125-cM map comprising 15 microsatellites and a granddaughter design counting 1158 Holstein-Friesian sires.

Letter to the Editor: Methods for mapping quantitative trait loci in autotetraploid species

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jing Chen ◽  
Lindsey J Leach ◽  
Zewei Luo
Keyword(s):  
Quantitative Trait Loci ◽  
Qtl Mapping ◽  
Statistical Methods ◽  
Quantitative Trait ◽  
Important Species ◽  
Letter To The Editor ◽  
Trait Loci ◽  
Points Of View

Abstract Mapping quantitative trait loci (QTL) in autotetraploid species represents a timely and challenging task. Two papers published by Wu and his colleagues proposed statistical methods for QTL mapping in these evolutionarily and economically important species. In this Letter to the Editor, we present critical comments on the fundamental conceptual errors involved, from both statistical and genetic points of view.

scholarly journals A method for computing identity by descent probabilities and quantitative trait loci mapping with dominant (AFLP) markers

2002 ◽  
Vol 79 (3) ◽  
pp. 247-258 ◽  
Author(s):  
MIGUEL PÉREZ-ENCISO ◽  
ODILE ROUSSOT
Keyword(s):  
Quantitative Trait Loci ◽  
Qtl Mapping ◽  
Quantitative Trait ◽  
Cost Effective ◽  
Significant Loss ◽  
Outbred Population ◽  
Identity By Descent ◽  
Fluorescent Band ◽  
Length Polymorphisms ◽  
Trait Loci

Amplified fragment length polymorphisms (AFLPs) are a widely used marker system: the technique is very cost-effective, easy and rapid, and reproducibly generates hundreds of markers. Unfortunately, AFLP alleles are typically scored as the presence or absence of a band and, thus, heterozygous and dominant homozygous genotypes cannot be distinguished. This results in a significant loss of information, especially as regards mapping of quantitative trait loci (QTLs). We present a Monte Carlo Markov Chain method that allows us to compute the identity by descent probabilities (IBD) in a general pedigree whose individuals have been typed for dominant markers. The method allows us to include the information provided by the fluorescent band intensities of the markers, the rationale being that homozygous individuals have on average higher band intensities than heterozygous individuals, as well as information from linked markers in each individual and its relatives. Once IBD probabilities are obtained, they can be combined into the QTL mapping strategy of choice. We illustrate the method with two simulated populations: an outbred population consisting of full sib families, and an F2 cross between inbred lines. Two marker spacings were considered, 5 or 20 cM, in the outbred population. There was almost no difference, for the practical purpose of QTL estimation, between AFLPs and biallelic codominant markers when the band density is taken into account, especially at the 5 cM spacing. The performance of AFLPs every 5 cM was also comparable to that of highly polymorphic markers (microsatellites) spaced every 20 cM. In economic terms, QTL mapping with a dense map of AFLPs is clearly better than microsatellite QTL mapping and little is lost in terms of accuracy of position. Nevertheless, at low marker densities, AFLPs or other biallelic markers result in very inaccurate estimates of QTL position.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document