scholarly journals Successes and Lessons Learned From Age-Friendly Community Collaborations: Baystate Health GWEP

2021 ◽  
Vol 5 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 496-497
Author(s):  
Rebecca Dobert ◽  
Maura Brennan
Keyword(s):  
Health Care ◽  
Media Coverage ◽  
Community Health Centers ◽  
Medical Center ◽  
Community Outreach ◽  
Lessons Learned ◽  
Health Centers ◽  
Community Based ◽  
Healthcare Improvement ◽  
The City

Abstract Baystate is the largest health system in Western Massachusetts with 4 hospitals, 3 Community Health Centers (CHCs) and a large primary care network. Baystate Medical Center (BMC) is in Springfield, Massachusetts. BMC and the CHCs were the first health care sites nationally to be recognized by the Institute for Healthcare Improvement as “Committed to Care Excellence” in the age friendly movement. Collaboration with a city-wide coalition of community-based organizations led to simultaneous recognition of Baystate as “age friendly” and recognition of the city as both dementia and age friendly. The 3 awards were presented at a Springfield senior center with media coverage and the participation of the mayor and other political leaders. This collaboration persists and the GWEP and coalition partners continue to participate in multiple joint educational and community outreach projects. As a result, the city coalition has added health care to its initial focus on housing and transportation.

Are Communities Willing to Transition Into Learning Health Care Communities? A Community-Based Participatory Evaluation of Stakeholders’ Receptivity

2021 ◽  
pp. 104973232199864
Author(s):  
Nabil Natafgi ◽  
Olayinka Ladeji ◽  
Yoon Duk Hong ◽  
Jacqueline Caldwell ◽  
C. Daniel Mullins
Keyword(s):  
Health Care ◽  
Health Care Delivery ◽  
Health Care Professionals ◽  
Care Delivery ◽  
Lessons Learned ◽  
Community Members ◽  
Community Based ◽  
Care Community ◽  
Care Experience ◽  
National Initiative

This article aims to determine receptivity for advancing the Learning Healthcare System (LHS) model to a novel evidence-based health care delivery framework—Learning Health Care Community (LHCC)—in Baltimore, as a model for a national initiative. Using community-based participatory, qualitative approach, we conducted 16 in-depth interviews and 15 focus groups with 94 participants. Two independent coders thematically analyzed the transcripts. Participants included community members (38%), health care professionals (29%), patients (26%), and other stakeholders (7%). The majority considered LHCC to be a viable model for improving the health care experience, outlining certain parameters for success such as the inclusion of home visits, presentation of research evidence, and incorporation of social determinants and patients’ input. Lessons learned and challenges discussed by participants can help health systems and communities explore the LHCC aspiration to align health care delivery with an engaged, empowered, and informed community.

After the Affordable Care Act: Health Reform and the Safety Net

2016 ◽  
Vol 44 (4) ◽  
pp. 585-588
Author(s):  
Peter Shin ◽  
Marsha Regenstein
Keyword(s):  
Health Care ◽  
Community Health ◽  
Affordable Care Act ◽  
Health Reform ◽  
Community Health Centers ◽  
Safety Net ◽  
Public Hospitals ◽  
Health Centers ◽  
Safety Net Providers ◽  
The Affordable Care Act

Two major safety net providers – community health centers and public hospitals – continue to play a key role in the health care system even in the wake of coverage reform. This article examines the gains and threats they face under the Affordable Care Act.

scholarly journals Deployment of Analytics into the Healthcare Safety Net: Lessons Learned

2016 ◽  
Vol 8 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
David Hartzband ◽  
Feygele Jacobs
Keyword(s):  
Data Quality ◽  
Community Health ◽  
Health Center ◽  
Community Health Centers ◽  
Health Resources ◽  
Population Level ◽  
Safety Net ◽  
Lessons Learned ◽  
Health Centers ◽  
Effective Manner

To better understand existing capacity and help organizations plan for the strategic and expanded uses of data, a project was initiated that deployed contemporary, Hadoop-based, analytic technology into several multi-site community health centers (CHCs) and a primary care association (PCA). An initial data quality exercise was carried out after deployment, in which a number of analytic queries were executed using both the existing electronic health record (EHR) applications and in parallel, the analytic stack. Each organization carried out the EHR analysis using the definitions typically applied for routine reporting. The analysis using the analytic stack was carried out using those common definitions established for the Uniform Data System (UDS) by the Health Resources and Service Administration.  In addition, interviews with health center leadership and staff were completed to understand the context for the findings.The analysis uncovered many challenges and inconsistencies with respect to the definition of core terms (patient, encounter, etc.), data formatting, and missing, incorrect and unavailable data. At a population level, apparent underreporting of a number of diagnoses, specifically obesity and heart disease, was also evident in the results of the data quality exercise, for both the EHR-derived and stack analytic results.Data awareness, that is, an appreciation of the importance of data integrity, data hygiene and the potential uses of data, needs to be prioritized and developed by health centers and other healthcare organizations if analytics are to be used in an effective manner to support strategic objectives. While this analysis was conducted exclusively with community health center organizations, its conclusions and recommendations may be more broadly applicable. 

Organizational Factors Influencing the Use of Clinical Decision Support for Improving Cancer Screening Within Community Health Centers

2016 ◽  
pp. 118-148 ◽  
Author(s):  
Timothy Jay Carney ◽  
Michael Weaver ◽  
Anna M. McDaniel ◽  
Josette Jones ◽  
David A. Haggstrom
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Health Care ◽  
Decision Support ◽  
Cancer Screening ◽  
Community Health ◽  
Clinical Decision Support ◽  
Community Health Centers ◽  
Clinical Decision ◽  
Health Centers ◽  
Practice Setting

Adoption of clinical decision support (CDS) systems leads to improved clinical performance through improved clinician decision making, adherence to evidence-based guidelines, medical error reduction, and more efficient information transfer and to reduction in health care disparities in under-resourced settings. However, little information on CDS use in the community health care (CHC) setting exists. This study examines if organizational, provider, or patient level factors can successfully predict the level of CDS use in the CHC setting with regard to breast, cervical, and colorectal cancer screening. This study relied upon 37 summary measures obtained from the 2005 Cancer Health Disparities Collaborative (HDCC) national survey of 44 randomly selected community health centers. A multi-level framework was designed that employed an all-subsets linear regression to discover relationships between organizational/practice setting, provider, and patient characteristics and the outcome variable, a composite measure of community health center CDS intensity-of-use. Several organizational and provider level factors from our conceptual model were identified to be positively associated with CDS level of use in community health centers. The level of CDS use (e.g., computerized reminders, provider prompts at point-of-care) in support of breast, cervical, and colorectal cancer screening rate improvement in vulnerable populations is determined by both organizational/practice setting and provider factors. Such insights can better facilitate the increased uptake of CDS in CHCs that allows for improved patient tracking, disease management, and early detection in cancer prevention and control within vulnerable populations.

scholarly journals Building Community-Based Surge Capacity through a Public Health and Academic Collaboration: The Role of Community Health Centers

2006 ◽  
Vol 121 (2) ◽  
pp. 211-216 ◽  
Author(s):  
Howard K. Koh ◽  
Amie C. Shei ◽  
Janette Bataringaya ◽  
Jon Burstein ◽  
Paul D. Biddinger ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Public Health ◽  
Community Health ◽  
Community Health Centers ◽  
Health Centers ◽  
Community Based ◽  
Surge Capacity ◽  
Academic Collaboration ◽  
Building Community

scholarly journals Provision of Social Services and Health Care Quality in US Community Health Centers, 2017

2020 ◽  
Vol 110 (4) ◽  
pp. 567-573 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ashley M. Kranz ◽  
Ammarah Mahmud ◽  
Denis Agniel ◽  
Cheryl Damberg ◽  
Justin W. Timbie
Keyword(s):  
Health Care ◽  
Community Health ◽  
Social Services ◽  
Health Care Quality ◽  
Community Health Centers ◽  
Care Quality ◽  
Social Needs ◽  
Health Centers ◽  
Care Providers ◽  
Provision Of Services

Objectives. To describe the types of social services provided at community health centers (CHCs), characteristics of CHCs providing these services, and the association between on-site provision and health care quality. Methods. We surveyed CHCs in 12 US states and the District of Columbia during summer 2017 (n = 208) to identify referral to and provision of services to address 8 social needs. Regression models estimated factors associated with the provision of social services by CHCs and the association between providing services and health care quality (an 8-item composite). Results. CHCs most often offered on-site assistance for needs related to food or nutrition (43%), interpersonal violence (32%), and housing (30%). Participation in projects with community-based organizations was associated with providing services on-site (odds ratio = 2.48; P = .018). On-site provision was associated with better performance on measures of health care quality (e.g., each additional social service was associated with a 4.3 percentage point increase in colorectal cancer screenings). Conclusions. Some CHCs provide social services on-site, and this was associated with better performance on measures of health care quality. Public Health Implications. Health care providers are increasingly seeking to identify and address patients’ unmet social needs, and on-site provision of services is 1 strategy to consider.

Utilizing health care professionals in community health centers to prevent human trafficking

2019 ◽  
Vol 119 ◽  
pp. 99
Author(s):  
Isis Van Putten ◽  
Kimberly S.G. Chang ◽  
Susie B. Baldwin ◽  
Hanni Stoklosa
Keyword(s):  
Health Care ◽  
Community Health ◽  
Human Trafficking ◽  
Health Care Professionals ◽  
Community Health Centers ◽  
Health Centers

scholarly journals Comprehensiveness and programmatic vulnerability to stds/hiv/aids in primary care

2014 ◽  
Vol 48 (spe) ◽  
pp. 145-151 ◽  
Author(s):  
Luciane Ferreira do Val ◽  
Lucia Yasuko Izumi Nichiata
Keyword(s):  
Primary Care ◽  
Health Care ◽  
Primary Health Care ◽  
Prenatal Care ◽  
Online Survey ◽  
Health Centers ◽  
Multidisciplinary Teams ◽  
Primary Health ◽  
The City ◽  
Hiv Aids




This study aimed to identify programmatic vulnerability to STDs/HIV/AIDS in primary health centers (PHCs). This is a descrip - tive and quantitative study carried out in the city of São Paulo. An online survey was applied (FormSUS platform), involving administrators from 442 PHCs in the city, with responses received from 328 of them (74.2%), of which 53.6% were nurses. At - tention was raised in relation to program - matic vulnerability in the PHCs regarding certain items of infrastructure, prevention, treatment, prenatal care and integration among services on STDs/HIV/AIDS care. It was concluded that in order to reach comprehensiveness of actions for HIV/ AIDS in primary health care, it is necessary to consider programmatic vulnerability, in addition to more investment and reor - ganization of services in a dialogue with the stakeholders (users, multidisciplinary teams, and managers, among others).




Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document