scholarly journals How Long-Term Care Quality Assurance Measures Address Dementia in Australia, England, Japan, and the United States

2021 ◽  
Vol 5 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 503-503
Author(s):  
Michael Lepore ◽  
David Edvardsson ◽  
Ayumi Igarashi ◽  
Julienne Meyer

Abstract The prevalence of people with dementia living in long-term care (LTC) is high and rising internationally, and the need to improve LTC for people with dementia is widely recognized. In some countries, LTC quality assurance programs use quantitative measures of LTC quality, and international bodies emphasize the importance of person-centered care and healthy ageing outcomes. To better understand how LTC quality assurance programs address dementia, programs were reviewed in four countries—Australia, England, Japan, and the United States. Quality measures from each program were identified (n = 38) and examined to determine how they address dementia. Most measures did not address dementia, but four risk-adjusted for dementia (antipsychotic use, fractures, falls, mobility), one was dementia-specific (dementia/delirium hospitalizations), and one excluded people with dementia (losing bowel/bladder control). The other 32 measures were calculated equally regardless of the prevalence of dementia among LTC residents. Overall, LTC quality measurement differs internationally, but few measures address dementia. When dementia is addressed in quality measure calculations, it is most often as a risk-adjustor. Risk adjustment can help with attributing performance on these measures to the LTC setting rather than to the types of residents that the setting serves, but risk adjustment factors also are highly amenable to fraud, and thus require ongoing monitoring. Although LTC quality assessment programs and measures can help ensure people with dementia have access to quality LTC, adoption of measures that are meaningful to people with dementia—including measures of person-centered care and healthy ageing outcomes—remains needed.

2021 ◽  
Vol 33 (S1) ◽  
pp. 64-65
Author(s):  
Claudia Van Der Velden ◽  
Henriëtte G. Van Der Roest

Healthcare professionals working with people with dementia (PwD) have increasingly been moving away from task-oriented models of healthcare towards person-centered care (PCC). Several studies have showed positive results of PCC on quality of life of PwD. Also, it shows positive effects on self-esteem and work satisfaction of healthcare professionals (HCP).We developed an successful practice-oriented intervention to implement PCC in long-term care facilities (LTCFs), based on the theory of Kitwood. The intervention consists of different components and learning methods: 1)Management of the facility is trained. They have an important role in motivating HCPs and safeguarding PCC-policy in the future.2)Dementia Care Mapping (DCM)-observations are carried out to gain understanding of the LTCF. DCM is an evidence-based observational method and aims to give a good understanding of the quality of life of PwD.3)The training of staff starts with a Kick-off-meeting. During a ‘Mirror theater’ with professional actors, an act representing a familiar care situation is performed. Staff participates in the act to become aware of PCC. The kick-off also serves as a warming-up on PCC knowledge.4)After this, staff complete an interactive e-learning on the basic theory of PCC. The e-learning contains practical videos and exercises.5)Finally, staff follow two consecutive, practical-oriented team-trainings. They will learn what PCC means for their daily practice and how to reflect on it. The most effective part is the reflection on examples of their own clients, and get more aware of their own behavior. In between trainings, HCP will carry out a practice exercise and provide feedback in session two.In an early stage of the intervention we discuss the possibilities and adjust the approach to the needs and situation (culture, level of knowledge etc.) of the LTCF. Involvement of all the staff in the intervention is essential, so everyone speaks the same ‘language’ and staff can rely on each other. Based on experience, these factors contributes to a sustainable way to implement PCC in LTCFs.


2021 ◽  
Vol 5 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 160-160
Author(s):  
Michael Lepore ◽  
Kirsten Corazzini ◽  
Sheryl Zimmerman

Abstract Internationally sharable common data elements on residential long-term care (LTC) settings, such as nursing homes and assisted living facilities, can facilitate comparisons across diverse LTC settings for valuable insights on LTC regulation and oversight, practice and operations, infrastructure development, human resources issues, and quality and safety. However, such insights are predicated on the premise that data elements capture information that matters to the full LTC community, including residents, relatives and staff, and are able to be collected across diverse care settings, including low-resource contexts. A critique of much current LTC measurement is its focus on deficits and loss, rather than thriving, person-centered care, and healthy aging, which have been established as important to LTC communities internationally. Further, measurement burden, cultural differences in perceptions of data sharing, and data infrastructure differences are key issues for international data. An international collaborative of LTC researchers—Worldwide Elements to Harmonize Research in Long-Term Care Living Environments (WE-THRIVE)—has developed a set of common data elements that are recommended for parsimoniously assessing key outcomes, workforce and staffing, person-centered care, and the contexts within which LTC settings operate. The studies in this symposium provide insights into the validation and implementation of WE-THRIVE recommended measures in diverse, low-resource LTC contexts, including LTC settings in Brazil, China, and rural Midwest US. Study findings validate WE-THRIVE measures, and provide new knowledge to inform capacity-building for the measurement of person-centered care and healthy aging outcomes in diverse, low-resource, LTC settings.


2019 ◽  
Vol 71 (7) ◽  
pp. 1676-1683 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniel J Morgan ◽  
Min Zhan ◽  
Michihiko Goto ◽  
Carrie Franciscus ◽  
Bruce Alexander ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) is a common cause of health care–associated infections in long-term care facilities (LTCFs). The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention recommends contact precautions for the prevention of MRSA within acute care facilities, which are being used within the United States Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) for LTCFs in a modified fashion. The impact of contact precautions in long-term care is unknown. Methods To evaluate whether contact precautions decreased MRSA acquisition in LTCFs, compared to standard precautions, we performed a retrospective effectiveness study (pre-post, with concurrent controls) using data from the VA health-care system from 1 January 2011 until 31 December 2015, 2 years before and after a 2013 policy recommending a more aggressive form of contact precautions. Results Across 75 414 patient admissions from 74 long-term care facilities in the United States, the overall unadjusted rate of MRSA acquisition was 2.6/1000 patient days. Patients were no more likely to acquire MRSA if they were cared for using standard precautions versus contact precautions in a multivariable, discrete time survival analysis, controlling for patient demographics, risk factors, and year of admission (odds ratio, 0.97; 95% confidence interval, .85–1.12; P = .71). Conclusions MRSA acquisition and infections were not impacted by the use of active surveillance and contact precautions in LTCFs in the VA.


Author(s):  
Sadye L. M. Logan

James R. Kelly, Jr. (1934–2002) undertook pioneering work in the development and administration of the Veterans Administration (VA) Extended Care programs that has basically shaped the modalities of long-term care now available to veterans across the United States.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document