scholarly journals Which Cognitive Behavioral Therapy Formats Work for Depression in Dementia Family Caregivers ?

2021 ◽  
Vol 5 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 656-656
Author(s):  
Yue Sun ◽  
Zhi-wen Wang

Abstract Cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) has been shown to be effective to delay cognitive decline for family dementia caregivers (DCs). However, whether cognitive intervention could effectively reduce depression through internet, group, telephone, individual, unguided self-help and combined formats remains unclear. Pubmed, Embase, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Web of science, China National Knowledge Infrastructure database, Chinese Biomedical Literature database and Wan Fang database were systematically searched. A total of 34 studies were included in our analysis based on a series of rigorous screenings, which comprised 3577 DCs. We conducted a network meta-analysis (NMA) to evaluate the relative effects and rank probability of different CBT delivery formats. A series of analyses and assessments, such as the pairwise meta-analysis and the risk of bias, were performed concurrently. Compared with controls, internet, telephone, and individual showed the largest improvement on depressive symptoms, whereas the unguided self-help delivery format was less effective. Internet delivery formats had the highest probability among the five CBT delivery formats. Our study indicated that the internet might be the best delivery formats for reducing the depression of family DCs. The findings from our study may be useful for policy makers and service commissioners when they make choices among different CBT delivery formats.

2021 ◽  
Vol 5 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 651-651
Author(s):  
Yue Sun ◽  
Zhi-wen Wang

Abstract Cognitive intervention has been shown to be effective to delay cognitive decline in older adults with dementia. However, whether cognitive intervention could be effectively delivered in individual, group, telephone, guided self-help and unguided self-help formats remains unclear. Pubmed, Embase, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), CINAHL, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Web of science, China National Knowledge Infrastructure database, Chinese Biomedical Literature database and Wan Fang database were systematically searched. 3419 records were extracted, quality assessed, and double-blind screened by 2 authors. Totally 51 studies were included which enrolled 3388 participants. Network meta-analysis (NMA) was conducted to evaluate the relative effects and rank probability of different cognitive intervention delivery formats. For older adults with dementia, guided self-help, group and individual cognitive intervention delivery formats appeared effective in improving the cognitive function, while telephone and unguided self-help were not significantly inferior to control condition. Guided self-help had the highest probability of being the best treatment among the five cognitive intervention delivery formats. Health-care professionals should apply personalized cognitive intervention format based on individual condition and preferences.


2015 ◽  
Vol 19 ◽  
pp. 17-28 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fiona Yan-Yee Ho ◽  
Ka-Fai Chung ◽  
Wing-Fai Yeung ◽  
Tommy H. Ng ◽  
Ka-Shing Kwan ◽  
...  

SLEEP ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 44 (Supplement_2) ◽  
pp. A139-A140
Author(s):  
Janannii Selvanathan ◽  
Chi Pham ◽  
Mahesh Nagappa ◽  
Philip Peng ◽  
Marina Englesakis ◽  
...  

Abstract Introduction Patients with chronic non-cancer pain often report insomnia as a significant comorbidity. Cognitive behavioral therapy for insomnia (CBT-I) is recommended as the first line of treatment for insomnia, and several randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have examined the efficacy of CBT-I on various health outcomes in patients with comorbid insomnia and chronic non-cancer pain. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis on the effectiveness of CBT-I on sleep, pain, depression, anxiety and fatigue in adults with comorbid insomnia and chronic non-cancer pain. Methods A systematic search was conducted using ten electronic databases. The duration of the search was set between database inception to April 2020. Included studies must be RCTs assessing the effects of CBT-I on at least patient-reported sleep outcomes in adults with chronic non-cancer pain. Quality of the studies was assessed using the Cochrane risk of bias assessment and Yates quality rating scale. Continuous data were extracted and summarized using standard mean difference (SMD) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Results The literature search resulted in 7,772 articles, of which 14 RCTs met the inclusion criteria. Twelve of these articles were included in the meta-analysis. The meta-analysis comprised 762 participants. CBT-I demonstrated a large significant effect on patient-reported sleep (SMD = 0.87, 95% CI [0.55–1.20], p < 0.00001) at post-treatment and final follow-up (up to 9 months) (0.59 [0.31–0.86], p < 0.0001); and moderate effects on pain (SMD = 0.20 [0.06, 0.34], p = 0.006) and depression (0.44 [0.09–0.79], p= 0.01) at post-treatment. The probability of improving sleep and pain following CBT-I at post-treatment was 81% and 58%, respectively. The probability of improving sleep and pain at final follow-up was 73% and 57%, respectively. There were no statistically significant effects on anxiety and fatigue. Conclusion This systematic review and meta-analysis showed that CBT-I is effective for improving sleep in adults with comorbid insomnia and chronic non-cancer pain. Further, CBT-I may lead to short-term moderate improvements in pain and depression. However, there is a need for further RCTs with adequate power, longer follow-up periods, CBT for both insomnia and pain, and consistent scoring systems for assessing patient outcomes. Support (if any):


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document