Lump-Sum Compensation Claimed by a Collective Management Organization

2021 ◽  
2021 ◽  
pp. 158-202
Author(s):  
Eleonora Rosati

This chapter talks about Article 8 of Directive 2019/790, the European copyright directive in the Digital Single Market, which outlines provisions on the use of out-of-commerce works and other subject matter by cultural heritage institutions. It mentions the collective management organization that may conclude a non-exclusive licence for non-commercial purposes with a cultural heritage institution for the reproduction, distribution, and communication to the public or making available to the public of out-of-commerce works or other subject matter that are permanently in the collection of the institution. It also mentions the guarantee that all rightholders have equal treatment in relation to the terms of the licence. The chapter points out the liberty of rightholders to exclude their works or other subject matter from the licensing. It describes a work or other subject matter that is deemed to be out-of-commerce when it can be presumed that is not available to the public through customary channels of commerce.


Author(s):  
Lynette Owen

The trade in subsidiary rights can be of significant importance to the publishing process, with rights sales providing vital additional revenue for authors and publishers alike; in many cases, potential rights sales can influence the overall publishing decision. The acquisition of rights can extend the range of a commissioned list. This chapter sets out to examine the importance of securing a suitable rights ‘package’ from the author (or via the author’s agent) in order to maximize the exploitation of intellectual property rights through the active exploitation of appropriate rights categories such as same-language territorial rights, translation rights, serial rights, audio rights, dramatization rights, and electronic rights. In addition, it touches on areas of rights which are reactive (the granting of permissions) or in effect contracted out (collective secondary licensing via a mandate to the national Collective Management Organization). It also covers key issues on the acquisition of rights.


2016 ◽  
Vol 6 (3) ◽  
pp. 325
Author(s):  
Agus Sardjono ◽  
Brian Amy Prastyo ◽  
Derezka Gunti Larasati

2019 ◽  
Vol 4 (2) ◽  
pp. 129
Author(s):  
Adi Juardi ◽  
Nurwati Nurwati

He effectiveness of Collective Management Organization (CMO) in charge royalties on business karaoke questionable, this relates to the birth of Act No. 28 year 2014 about copyright which regulate in particular the CMO. Because there are still many karaoke business which still has not fulfilled the obligation to pay royalties of works of copyright music and their songs (karaoke company) exploitation for commercial business interests. This research aims to: (1) know the role of business in addressing CMO karaoke that doesn't pay royalties, (2) know the effectiveness of CMO administering royalties on the karaoke business person under law No. 28 Year 2014, (3) knowing the efforts in improving polling CMO royalty on the karaoke business. This type of research is the Juridical Sociological (Empirical) approach to legislation as well as interviews. The results of this study showed that the effectiveness of the CMO administering royalties have not been effective because it is based on the theory of legal effectiveness Soerjono Soekanto. Efforts in improving the collection of royalties already attempted CMO. The conclusions of this research that is not yet effective because CMO factor law enforcement community and culture that Indonesia is still not law abiding. Her advice is a strict law enforcement and awareness of the law business karaoke should be improved so that effective in running in CMO.


BDJ ◽  
1979 ◽  
Vol 147 (8) ◽  
pp. 224-225
Author(s):  
J Greenway
Keyword(s):  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document