6. Parliamentary Sovereignty

Author(s):  
Richard Clements ◽  
Philip Jones
2015 ◽  
Vol 46 (3) ◽  
pp. 989 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mario Patrono ◽  
Justin O Frosini

This article discusses the Constitution of the United Kingdom and then draws some comparisons between it and the Constitution of the United States of America. It touches on issues such as how the United Kingdom's commitment to parliamentary sovereignty has been affected by the country's relationship with the European Union.


ICL Journal ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 0 (0) ◽  
Author(s):  
Alexander Orakhelashvili

Abstract This article assesses the use of parliamentary sovereignty against the background that UK parliament proclaimed it to be preserved under 2018 and 2020 withdrawal acts. The evidence is analysed to show whether that position works in English law.


2018 ◽  
pp. 45-67
Author(s):  
Akash Paun

This chapter argues that the UK territorial constitution rests upon a profound ambiguity about its central principles. Parliamentary sovereignty remains at the core of how the English understand their constitution. Yet in Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland, alternative doctrines have flourished, especially since devolution, which conceded the right of each nation to determine its own form of government (popular sovereignty) and established a non-majoritarian system of power-sharing and cross-border governance in (Northern) Ireland. These developments imply that the UK is a voluntary ‘family of nations’ not a unitary state. Yet Westminster has never formally conceded this point and devolution could in theory be reversed by a simple parliamentary majority. Constructive ambiguity has been retained. However, the historic tendency to allow constitutional theory and practice to diverge may be unsustainable in the light of the EU referendum result and the wider mood of English political disaffection that Brexit has tapped into.


Author(s):  
John Alder ◽  
Keith Syrett

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document