scholarly journals MODERATE TO SEVERE ENDOSCOPIC INFLAMMATION IS FREQUENT AFTER ACHIEVING CLINICAL REMISSION IN PEDIATRIC ULCERATIVE COLITIS

2021 ◽  
Vol 27 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S13-S13
Author(s):  
Chen Sarbagili-Shabat ◽  
Dror Weiner ◽  
Joram Wardi ◽  
Lee Abramas ◽  
Michal Yaakov ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ulcerative Colitis ◽  
Clinical Remission ◽  
Residual Disease ◽  
Activity Index ◽  
Final Analysis ◽  
Mucosal Healing ◽  
Sustained Remission ◽  
High Relapse Rate ◽  
Mayo Score

Abstract Background Pediatric ulcerative colitis (UC) is characterized by low sustained remission rates and frequent extension of disease even if clinical remission is obtained with therapy. Moderate to severe endoscopic activity is a risk factor for relapse while evidence regarding early mucosal healing or persistence of inflammation after remission in children is not available. Our aim was to evaluate if persistence of significant inflammation is common and could explain the high relapse rate in pediatric UC. Methods Pediatric UC patients with clinical remission, defined as pediatric UC activity index (PUCAI) scores < 10, were prospectively assessed for mucosal healing by endoscopy 3–5 months after remission was documented. Mayo score was assessed for each segment by a blinded adult gastroenterologist using central reading. Symptomatic patients prior to sigmoidoscopy were excluded Sustained remission was assessed retrospectively at 18 months follow-up. Results Forty-six children were enrolled, 28 children in continuous clinical remission at time of sigmoidoscopy were included in the final analysis. Mayo 0 was present in 12/28 (42.86%), Mayo 1 in 2/28 (7.1%) and Mayo 2–3 in 14/28 (50.0%) endoscopies. Among 23/28 patients with follow-up through 18 months, remission was sustained in 2/11 (18.18%) of patients with Mayo 2 and 3 versus 6/12 (50.0%) with Mayo score 0–1. Conclusion Over 50% of children assessed for mucosal healing 3–5 months after clinical remission is obtained have residual disease activity, primarily moderate to severe inflammation which was associated with lower sustained remission. Early sigmoidoscopy after clinical remission for assessment of mucosal disease should be considered in pediatric UC.

scholarly journals P640 Moderate to severe endoscopic inflammation is frequent after clinical remission in pediatric ulcerative colitis: A cause for disease extension and relapse?

2020 ◽  
Vol 14 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S530-S531
Author(s):  
C Sarbagili Shabat ◽  
D Weiner ◽  
J Wardi ◽  
L Abramas ◽  
M Yaakov ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ulcerative Colitis ◽  
Clinical Remission ◽  
Mucosal Healing ◽  
Current Therapy ◽  
Sustained Remission ◽  
High Relapse Rate ◽  
Mayo Score ◽  
Remission Rates ◽  
Disease Extension ◽  
Relapse Rates

Abstract Background Pediatric ulcerative colitis (UC) is characterised by low sustained remission rates and frequent extension of disease even if clinical remission is obtained. Current therapy in pediatric UC is driven primarily by clinical response. Extension of disease and high relapse rates may be due to a failure to obtain mucosal healing with treatment despite clinical remission. Our aim was to evaluate this possibility by assessing endoscopic disease activity after remission was obtained. Methods Pediatric UC patients with clinical remission, defined as sustained PUCAI < 10 three months after remission was obtained, were prospectively assessed for mucosal healing by endoscopy. Mayo score was assessed for each segment by a blinded adult gastroenterologist using central reading. Results 41 children were enrolled after informed consent, 7 were excluded because of a PUCAI score 10–15 at the time of sigmoidoscopy. Thirty-four Sigmoidoscopies were performed 12–20 weeks after reporting clinical remission. Mucosal healing Mayo 0 was present in 15 endoscopies (44%), Mayo 1 was present in 2 endoscopies (6%) and moderate to severe endoscopic scores Mayo 2–3 was present in 17 endoscopies (50%). Conclusion About 50% of children assessed for mucosal healing 3–5 months after clinical remission is obtained have residual moderate to severe inflammation. Inadequate endoscopic improvement despite clinical remission may explain disease extension and the high relapse rate in children.

scholarly journals Long-term, Real-life, Observational Study in Treating Outpatient Ulcerative Colitis with Golimumab

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Antonio Tursi ◽  
Giammarco Mocci ◽  
Walter Elisei ◽  
Leonardo Allegretta ◽  
Raffaele Colucci ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ulcerative Colitis ◽  
Clinical Response ◽  
Clinical Remission ◽  
Real Life ◽  
Mucosal Healing ◽  
Term Treatment ◽  
Short Term Treatment ◽  
Mayo Score

Background and Aims: Several studies have found Golimumab (GOL) effective and safe in the short-term treatment of ulcerative colitis (UC), but few long-term data are currently available from real world. Our aim was to assess the long-term real-life efficacy and safety of GOL in managing UC outpatients in Italy. Methods: A retrospective multicenter study assessing consecutive UC outpatients treated with GOL for at least 3-month of follow-up was made. Primary endpoints were the induction and maintenance of remission in UC, defined as Mayo score ≤2. Several secondary endpoints, including clinical response, colectomy rate, steroid free remission and mucosal healing, were also assessed during the follow-up. Results: One hundred and seventy-eight patients were enrolled and followed up for a median (IQR) time of 9 (3-18) months (mean time follow-up: 33.1±13 months). Clinical remission was achieved in 57 (32.1%) patients: these patients continued with GOL, but only 6 patients (3.4%) were still under clinical remission with GOL at the 42nd month of follow-up. Clinical response occurred in 64 (36.4%) patients; colectomy was performed in 8 (7.8%) patients, all of them having primary failure. Steroid-free remission occurred in 23 (12.9%) patients, and mucosal healing was achieved in 29/89 (32.6%) patients. Adverse events occurred in 14 (7.9%) patients. Conclusions: Golimumab does not seem able to maintain long-term remission in UC in real life. The safety profile was good.

scholarly journals Effectiveness of treatment of moderate ulcerative colitis with prolonged mesalazine in real clinical practice

2021 ◽  
pp. 144-151
Author(s):  
O. V. Knyazev ◽  
A. V. Kagramanova ◽  
A. A. Lishchinskaya
Keyword(s):  
Ulcerative Colitis ◽  
Clinical Remission ◽  
Topical Therapy ◽  
Fecal Calprotectin ◽  
Mucosal Healing ◽  
Prolonged Release ◽  
Mayo Score ◽  
Endoscopic Remission ◽  
Oral Mesalazine ◽  
High Doses

Introduction. Ulcerative colitis (UC) is one of the severe therapeutic diseases. High doses of oral granular mesalazine are required to maintain clinical and endoscopic remission of UC, which may be sufficient and supposedly more acceptable for patients, as some studies showed that adherence to topical therapy is significantly lower than to oral 5-ASA drugs.Objective of the study. To evaluate the efficacy of therapy of patients with moderate left-sided ulcerative colitis (UC) and pancolitis receiving prolonged-release ethylcellulose-coated mesalazine.Materials and methods. The evaluation of the outcomes of treatment of UC patients who received prolonged-release mesalazine was carried out. We examined 87 patients with UC who received granular ethylcellulose-coated mesalazine, of those 38 (43.7%) men and 49 (56.3%) women. The average age of the enrolled patients was 38.3 ± 12.6 years.Results and discussion. After 2 weeks from the beginning of therapy with prolonged-release mesalazine, the majority of patients – 71 (81.6%) responded to the therapy. After 12 weeks, 71 (81.6%) of 87 UC patients, who responded to therapy with prolongedrelease mesalazine, remained in clinical remission. On average, the Mayo score in the group decreased from 7.6 ± 0.99 to 2.6 ± 0.25 points. There was a significant decrease in CRP, ESR, leukocytosis, and fecal calprotectin. After 26 weeks, Mayo score in the group of patients remained on average at the level of 2.2–2.3 points. The number of UC patients with colon mucosal healing was 32 (36.8%) patients. A year after the start of therapy with prolonged-release mesalazine, 69 (79.3%) UC patients who responded to therapy had a clinical remission, of those 32 (36.8%) patients had a clinical and endoscopic remission. During the year of observation, no case of surgical intervention or re-hospitalization due to exacerbation of the disease was recorded in patients with UC who achieved remission.Conclusions. Treatment of moderate active UC should begin with oral mesalazine ≥ 3 g per day in combination with topical mesalazine. The prolonged-release mesalazines are the most preferred

scholarly journals Histological Markers of Clinical Relapse in Endoscopically Quiescent Ulcerative Colitis

2019 ◽  
Vol 26 (11) ◽  
pp. 1722-1729 ◽  
Author(s):  
David Kevans ◽  
Richard Kirsch ◽  
Callum Dargavel ◽  
Boyko Kabakchiev ◽  
Robert Riddell ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ulcerative Colitis ◽  
Mucosal Healing ◽  
Mucosal Inflammation ◽  
Clinical Relapse ◽  
Disease Relapse ◽  
Mayo Score ◽  
Therapeutic Decisions ◽  
First Relapse ◽  
Histological Activity

Abstract Background In ulcerative colitis (UC) patients who have achieved mucosal healing, active microscopic colonic mucosal inflammation is commonly observed. We aimed to assess the association between histological activity and disease relapse in endoscopically quiescent UC. Methods Ulcerative colitis patients with endoscopically quiescent disease and ≥12 months of follow-up were included. Biopsies were reviewed for the presence of basal plasmacytosis (BPC) and active histological inflammation, defined as a Geboes score (GS) ≥3.2. Primary outcome measures were disease relapse at 18 months and time to first relapse after index colonoscopy. Results Seventy-six UC patients (51% male; mean age, 38.6 years; median follow-up [range], 75.2 [2–118] months) were included. Sixty-two percent had an endoscopic Mayo score of 0 at index colonoscopy. Basal plasmacytosis was present in 46% and active histological inflammation in 30% of subjects. Presence of BPC was associated with a significantly shorter time to disease relapse (P = 0.01). Active histological inflammation was significantly associated with clinical relapse at 18 months (P = 0.0005) and shorter time to clinical relapse (P = 0.0006). Multivariate analysis demonstrated active histological inflammation to be independently associated with clinical relapse at 18 months and time to clinical relapse. Conclusions In endoscopically quiescent UC, active histological inflammation and the presence of BPC are adjunctive histological markers associated with increased likelihood of disease relapse. Although prospective studies are required, the presence of these histological markers should be a factor considered when making therapeutic decisions in UC.

scholarly journals P690 A propensity score weighted comparison of vedolizumab, adalimumab, and golimumab in patients with ulcerative colitis: Real-life data from the Sicilian Network for Inflammatory Bowel Disease (SN-IBD)

2020 ◽  
Vol 14 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S561-S562
Author(s):  
F S Macaluso ◽  
M Ventimiglia ◽  
W Fries ◽  
A Viola ◽  
M Cappello ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ulcerative Colitis ◽  
Inflammatory Bowel Disease ◽  
Propensity Score ◽  
Clinical Benefit ◽  
Real Life ◽  
Mucosal Healing ◽  
Treatment Persistence ◽  
Mayo Score ◽  
Inflammatory Bowel

Abstract Background No real-life study aiming at comparing at the same time the effectiveness of vedolizumab (VDZ), adalimumab (ADA), and golimumab (GOL) in Ulcerative colitis (UC) is currently available. Methods Data of consecutive patients with UC treated with VDZ, ADA, and GOL from June 2015 to December 2018 were extracted from the cohort of the Sicilian Network for Inflammatory Bowel Disease (SN-IBD). A three-arms propensity score-adjusted analysis was performed to reduce bias caused by imbalanced covariates at baseline, including the proportion of TNF-α inhibitor naïve and non-naïve patients, using the Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting (IPTW) method. The effectiveness was evaluated at 8 weeks, 52 weeks, and as treatment persistence at the end of follow-up. The clinical endpoints were steroid-free clinical remission (partial Mayo score <2 without steroid use) and clinical response (reduction of the partial Mayo score ≥2 points with a concomitant decrease of steroid dosage compared with baseline). The sum of the two outcomes was defined as a clinical benefit. The achievement of mucosal healing (endoscopic Mayo score 0–1) was assessed after at least 6 months of biological treatment. Results A total of 463 treatments (VDZ: n = 187; ADA: n = 168; GOL: n = 108) were included, with a median follow-up of 47.6 weeks (IQR 20.0–85.9). At 8 weeks, a clinical benefit was achieved in 70.6% patients treated with VDZ, in 68.5% patients treated with ADA, and in 67.6% patients treated with GOL (p = n.s. for all comparisons). After 52 weeks, VDZ showed better rates of clinical benefit compared with both ADA (71.6% vs. 47.5; OR: 2.79, 95% CI 1.63–4.79, p < 0.001) and GOL (71.6% vs. 40.2%; OR: 3.77, 95% CI 2.08–6.80, p < 0.001), while the difference between ADA and GOL was not significant. Cox survival analysis demonstrated that patients treated with VDZ had a reduced probability of treatment discontinuation compared with those treated with ADA (HR: 0.42, 95% CI 0.28–0.64, p < 0.001) and GOL (HR: 0.30, 95% CI 0.19–0.46, p < 0.001), while patients treated with ADA had a reduced risk of treatment discontinuation compared with those treated with GOL (HR: 0.71, 95% CI 0.50–1.00, p = 0.048). Post-treatment mucosal healing rates showed a numerical but non-significant difference in favour of VDZ (48.1%) compared with ADA and GOL (38.0% and 34.6%, respectively). Conclusion In the first study comparing at the same time the clinical effectiveness of VDZ, ADA, and GOL in UC patients via propensity score-adjusted analysis, VDZ was superior to both subcutaneous agents at 52 weeks and as treatment persistence, while ADA showed a superior treatment persistence compared with GOL.

scholarly journals P522 Effectiveness of tofacitinib in a real-world Israeli cohort of patients with moderate-severe ulcerative colitis

2021 ◽  
Vol 15 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S498-S499
Author(s):  
I Avni Biron ◽  
A Bar-Gil Shitrit ◽  
B Koslowsky ◽  
U Kopylov ◽  
A Levartovsky ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ulcerative Colitis ◽  
Real World ◽  
Disease Duration ◽  
Activity Index ◽  
Albumin Level ◽  
Severe Ulcerative Colitis ◽  
Mayo Score ◽  
Observational Cohort ◽  
Retrospective Observational Cohort Study

Abstract Background We sought to define the effectiveness of tofacitinib in a real-world (RW) cohort of patients with moderate to severe ulcerative colitis (UC). Methods This was a multi-center retrospective observational cohort study (2017–2020). Clinical response and remission were defined as a reduction in Simple Clinical Colitis Activity Index (SCCAI) or partial Mayo score (PMS) of ≥3, and SCCAI ≤2 or a PMS ≤1, respectively. Results We included 73 patients (47% male; median age 26 years [IQR 19.5–39.5], disease duration 7 years [IQR 2.5–14.5], follow-up 7.1 months [IQR 3–12]), 91% biologics-experienced, and 74% ≥ 2-biologics. Half of patients used concomitant steroids. Overall, 56.1% discontinued therapy due to either lack of response and/or adverse events (AEs), median time to discontinuation - 9.7 months (IQR 3.4–16). Based on per-protocol analysis, after induction (week-8–16), 33.3% achieved response, 23.3% remission, and 19% corticosteroid free remission. At early maintenance (week 26), 50% achieved response, 26.8% remission, and 24.4% corticosteroid free remission. There were no differences between biologics-experienced and naïve patients. Seventeen patients (23.2%) had an AE: herpes zoster- 2.7%, hospitalization- 12.3%, and colectomy- 2.7%. Remitters had higher albumin level compared with non-remitters (4.2±0.35 Vs. 3.8±0.35, P=0.023, respectively). Conclusion In this multicenter RW cohort of highly biologics - experienced patients with UC, those who continued tofacitinib throughout induction achieved 50% response and 27% remission. Tofacitinib was well-tolerated.

scholarly journals P411 Baseline Hypertrophy of the Submucosa at intestinal ultrasound predicts Failure of Treatment in patients with ulcerative colitis

2021 ◽  
Vol 15 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S418-S419
Author(s):  
F de Voogd ◽  
M Duijvestein ◽  
C Ponsioen ◽  
M Löwenberg ◽  
G D’Haens ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ulcerative Colitis ◽  
Layer Thickness ◽  
Activity Index ◽  
Age At Onset ◽  
Muscularis Propria ◽  
Fecal Calprotectin ◽  
Mucosal Healing ◽  
Wall Layer ◽  
Signal Loss

Abstract Background Submucosal fibrosis in ulcerative colitis (UC) has been associated with disease severity in colectomy specimens. As intestinal ultrasound (IUS) visualizes all individual wall layers, we aimed to evaluate baseline IUS features to determine endoscopic response and investigate changes in wall layers during anti-inflammatory treatment in patients with UC Methods Moderate-severe UC patients (endoscopic Mayo score (EMS)≥2) extending beyond the rectum starting treatment were included. Simple Clinical Colitis Activity Index (SCCAI), fecal calprotectin (FCP), IUS and endoscopy were performed at baseline and at follow-up between week 8 and 26. BWT, individual wall layer thickness (WT) (mucosa (MC), submucosa (SM) and muscularis propria (MP)) and ratios among layers, Colour Doppler Signal, loss of haustrations, loss of stratification and hyperechogenicity of the submucosa (HoS) (Figure 1) were scored for the sigmoid colon (SC). EMS was assessed for the SC: endoscopic remission (ER) was defined as EMS=0 and endoscopic improvement (EI) as EMS≤1. For statistical analysis a paired t-test and X2-test were used. Results 49 patients were included of whom 61% failed ≥1 biological. 59% started tofacitinib and 41% started a biological. At follow-up, 30% and 49% reached ER and EI, respectively. BWT decreased significantly when ER (2.32 ± 1.63 mm vs 1.00 ± 1.98 mm, p=0.034) or EI (2.53 ± 1.66 mm vs 0.30 ± 1.58 mm, p<0.0001) was reached. In patients with ER and EI, the SM thickness showed significantly more pronounced decrease compared to the other wall layers (Table 1 and Figure 2). Baseline presence of HoS (29% of patients) predicted failure of treatment (ER: OR: 0.10, 95% CI: 0.01-0.87, p=0.014, EI: OR: 0.16, 95% CI: 0.04-0.65, p=0.008,). Furthermore, when HoS was present, SCCAI (7.33 ± 3.62 vs 9.75 ± 3.23, p=0.023) and FCP (1249 ± 903 µg/g vs 2494 ± 2277 µg/g, p=0.008) were significantly lower at baseline. Also, patients with HoS more frequently failed one (OR: 4.44, 95% CI: 1.08-18.32, p=0.03) or multiple biologicals (OR: 5.63, 95% CI: 1.54-20.52, p=0.009). However, disease duration (p=0.950) or age at onset (p=0.853) did not differ between groups. Conclusion This is the first study showing that HoS on IUS is a predictor of endoscopic non-response to biologicals and tofacitinib in patients with UC. Additionally, changes in SM layer thickness is the most important component of the total bowel wall when evaluating mucosal healing on IUS.

scholarly journals P372 Effectiveness and safety of immunosuppressants for pouch disorders: results from the RESERVO Study of GETECCU

2021 ◽  
Vol 15 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S388-S390
Author(s):  
F Mesonero Gismero ◽  
Y Zabana ◽  
A Fernández-Clotet ◽  
E Leo ◽  
B Caballol ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ulcerative Colitis ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Clinical Response ◽  
Clinical Remission ◽  
Activity Index ◽  
Disease Activity Index ◽  
Multicentric Study ◽  
Previous Diagnosis

Abstract Background Pouchitis and other inflammatory disorders of the pouch (IDP), such as Crohn′s-like disease of the pouch (CDP), are frequent in patients operated for a previous diagnosis of ulcerative colitis. Many different therapies have been used, but the effectiveness of immunosupresants (IMM) has been poorly explored in this setting. Our aim was to evaluate the use, efficacy and safety of IMM in patients with pouchitis or another IDP. Methods Retrospective and multicentric study of a Spanish cohort of pouch-carrying patients with previous diagnosis of ulcerative colitis, and subsequent diagnosis of IDP, following ECCO diagnostic criteria. Patients who used IMM to treat these conditions were selected. Clinical effectiveness was evaluated at long-term. We defined clinical remission as returning to the previous stool frequency, no pain or defecatory urgency, clinical response as the improvement in these parameters without the achievement of remission, and non-response as no improvement or worsening symptoms. Endoscopic response was evaluated when possible using modified pouchitis disease activity index (PDAI) endoscopic subscore. Adverse events were collected. We used descriptive statistics. Results In the overall cohort of 338 patients with IDP, 93 (27%) were treated with IMM. Of those, 57% males, median age 40 (20-71) ys, and 72% non-smokers. Colectomy was performed at a median age of 31 (18-63) ys and IPD was diagnosed 25 (1-235) months after ileostomy closure. IMM used were thiopurines (n=86), methotrexate (n=4), cyclosporine (n=2) and tacrolimus (n=1). IMM were used as monotherapy in 66 (71%) cases and were indicated as treatment of pouchitis (n=60, 65%), CDP (n=32, 34.4%) and cuffitis (n=1, 1%). Effectiveness was evaluated only for thiopurine monotherapy (n=62). After a median follow-up of 23 (1-234) months, clinical remission was achieved in 31%, clinical response in 31% and non-response in 38% (Figure 1). There were no differences in effectiveness between pouchitis and CDP (63.9% vs 57.7%, p= 0.62). Endoscopic response was evaluated in 19 (30.6%) cases. After a median of 9 months of follow-up median PDAI endoscopic subscore dropped from 3 (range 2-4) to 1 (range 0-3), (Figure 2). Adverse events related with treatment appeared in 28 patients (45%). Thiopurines were discontinued in 39 cases (63%) due to failure (17), toxicity (16) and long remission (6 cases). Conclusion In our cohort, thiopurines were used in 27% of patients with IDP, with long-term benefit (remission or response) in around two-thirds of them. This therapy could be one more option to manage these disorders.

scholarly journals Real-world Effectiveness and Safety of Vedolizumab for the Treatment of Inflammatory Bowel Disease: The Scottish Vedolizumab Cohort

2019 ◽  
Vol 13 (9) ◽  
pp. 1111-1120 ◽  
Author(s):  
N Plevris ◽  
C S Chuah ◽  
R M Allen ◽  
I D Arnott ◽  
P N Brennan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ulcerative Colitis ◽  
Inflammatory Bowel Disease ◽  
Crohn’S Disease ◽  
Crohn's Disease ◽  
Real World ◽  
Bowel Disease ◽  
Clinical Remission ◽  
Mucosal Healing ◽  
Inflammatory Bowel

Abstract Background & Aims Vedolizumab is an anti-a4b7 monoclonal antibody that is licensed for the treatment of moderate to severe Crohn’s disease and ulcerative colitis. The aims of this study were to establish the real-world effectiveness and safety of vedolizumab for the treatment of inflammatory bowel disease. Methods This was a retrospective study involving seven NHS health boards in Scotland between June 2015 and November 2017. Inclusion criteria included: a diagnosis of ulcerative colitis or Crohn’s disease with objective evidence of active inflammation at baseline (Harvey–Bradshaw Index[HBI] ≥5/Partial Mayo ≥2 plus C-reactive protein [CRP] >5 mg/L or faecal calprotectin ≥250 µg/g or inflammation on endoscopy/magnetic resonance imaging [MRI]); completion of induction; and at least one clinical follow-up by 12 months. Kaplan–Meier survival analysis was used to establish 12-month cumulative rates of clinical remission, mucosal healing, and deep remission [clinical remission plus mucosal healing]. Rates of serious adverse events were described quantitatively. Results Our cohort consisted of 180 patients with ulcerative colitis and 260 with Crohn’s disease. Combined median follow-up was 52 weeks (interquartile range [IQR] 26–52 weeks). In ulcerative colitis, 12-month cumulative rates of clinical remission, mucosal healing, and deep remission were 57.4%, 47.3%, and 38.5%, respectively. In Crohn’s disease, 12-month cumulative rates of clinical remission, mucosal healing, and deep remission were 58.4%, 38.9%, and 28.3% respectively. The serious adverse event rate was 15.6 per 100 patient-years of follow-up. Conclusions Vedolizumab is a safe and effective treatment for achieving both clinical remission and mucosal healing in ulcerative colitis and Crohn’s disease.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document