The Greek Presidency of the Council of the European Union: the Challenge of Asylum and Immigration: Athens, 8-9 November 2002, Offices of the Greek Ombudsman Conference Organised by the Greek Ombudsman the United Nations High Commission for Refugees, the Greek National Commission for Human Rights, and the Greek Council for Refugees

2002 ◽  
Vol 14 (4) ◽  
pp. 632-638 ◽  
Keyword(s):  
European Union ◽  
Human Rights ◽  
United Nations ◽  
National Commission ◽  
The European Union ◽  
The United Nations

Instrumenty polityki równości płci w kontekście sytuacji w Polsce

2016 ◽  
pp. 88-109
Author(s):  
Wiktoria Domagała
Keyword(s):  
European Union ◽  
United Nations ◽  
Gender Equality ◽  
Gender Inequality ◽  
Equal Opportunities ◽  
The European Union ◽  
The United Nations

The article undertakes the issue of gender equality policies in the context of its indicators. The main purpose of the paper is to identify the areas of gender inequality, its scale and determinants. Firstly, the article presents the legislation of gender equality policies – its main objectives. Next, the paper discusses indicators that were implemented by organisations such as the Organisation of the United Nations and the European Union. These selected indicators are presented, taking into account the situation in Poland. In conclusion, the paper highlights the main obstacles to the pursuit of equal opportunities for women and men in Poland.

scholarly journals States, firms, and security: How private actors implement sanctions, lessons learned from the Netherlands

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-20
Author(s):  
Francesco Giumelli ◽  
Michal Onderco
Keyword(s):  
United States ◽  
European Union ◽  
United Nations ◽  
The United States ◽  
United Nations Security Council ◽  
The European Union ◽  
Public Authorities ◽  
For Profit ◽  
The United Nations ◽  
Private Actors

Abstract While the current practice of the United Nations Security Council, the European Union, and the United States leans towards imposing only targeted sanctions in most of the cases, private actors often complain about inability to process financial transactions, ship goods, or deliver services in countries where sanctions targets are located. The impact of sanctions often ends up being widespread and indiscriminate because sanctions are implemented by for-profit actors. This article investigates how for-profit actors relate to the imposition of sanctions, how they reflect them in their decisions, and how they interact with the public authorities. The findings of our research show that for-profit actors, with the possible exception of the largest multinationals, do not engage with public authorities before the imposition of sanctions. The behaviour of for-profit actors in the implementation phase is in line with the assumption of firms and business as profit-maximisers. Weighting the profits from business against the costs of (non-)compliance and make the decisions that in their view maximise their profit. Indeed, de-risking seems to be the most common approach by the companies due to the uncertainties produced by the multiple and overlapping sanctions regimes imposed by the United Nations, the European Union, and the United States.

Jungtinių Tautų ir Europos Sąjungos tikslinės finansinės ribojamosios priemonės: poreikis užtikrinti teisę į teisingą procesą

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
◽  
Viltė Kristina Steponėnaitė
Keyword(s):  
European Union ◽  
United Nations ◽  
Fair Trial ◽  
The European Union ◽  
The United Nations ◽  
The Right ◽  
Restrictive Measures

Targeted financial restrictive measures of the United Nations and the European Union: necessity to ensure the right to a fair trial

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document