scholarly journals Integrity of clinical information in computerized order requisitions for diagnostic imaging

2018 ◽  
Vol 25 (12) ◽  
pp. 1651-1656 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ronilda Lacson ◽  
Romeo Laroya ◽  
Aijia Wang ◽  
Neena Kapoor ◽  
Daniel I Glazer ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Medical Center ◽  
Academic Medical Center ◽  
Clinical Information ◽  
Clinical Decision ◽  
Accurate Diagnosis ◽  
Institutional Review Board ◽  
Institutional Review ◽  
Academic Medical ◽  
Potential Impact ◽  
Kappa Agreement

Abstract Objective Assess information integrity (concordance and completeness of documented exam indications from the electronic health record [EHR] imaging order requisition, compared to EHR provider notes), and assess potential impact of indication inaccuracies on exam planning and interpretation. Methods This retrospective study, approved by the Institutional Review Board, was conducted at a tertiary academic medical center. There were 139 MRI lumbar spine (LS-MRI) and 176 CT abdomen/pelvis orders performed 4/1/2016-5/31/2016 randomly selected and reviewed by 4 radiologists for concordance and completeness of relevant exam indications in order requisitions compared to provider notes, and potential impact of indication inaccuracies on exam planning and interpretation. Forty each LS-MRI and CT abdomen/pelvis were re-reviewed to assess kappa agreement. Results Requisition indications were more likely to be incomplete (256/315, 81%) than discordant (133/315, 42%) compared to provider notes (p < 0.0001). Potential impact of discrepancy between clinical information in requisitions and provider notes was higher for radiologist’s interpretation than for exam planning (135/315, 43%, vs 25/315, 8%, p < 0.0001). Agreement among radiologists for concordance, completeness, and potential impact was moderate to strong (Kappa 0.66-0.89). Indications in EHR order requisitions are frequently incomplete or discordant compared to physician notes, potentially impacting imaging exam planning, interpretation and accurate diagnosis. Such inaccuracies could also diminish the relevance of clinical decision support alerts if based on information in order requisitions. Conclusions Improved availability of relevant documented clinical information within EHR imaging requisition is necessary for optimal exam planning and interpretation.

Publication of Pharmacy Residency Research: A 12-Year Cohort From an Academic Medical Center

2021 ◽  
pp. 089719002110212
Author(s):  
Joshua T. Swan ◽  
Elsie Rizk ◽  
Namhee Kwak ◽  
Jessica Guastadisegni ◽  
Nathaniel Thompson-Moore ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Statistical Analysis ◽  
Research Training ◽  
Medical Center ◽  
Academic Medical Center ◽  
Institutional Review Board ◽  
Research Projects ◽  
High Quality Research ◽  
Residency Programs ◽  
Institutional Review ◽  
Academic Medical

Background: Pharmacy residency programs provide research training experiences to residents, and publication is considered an indicator of high-quality research experiences. Objective: This study described attributes of pharmacy residents, residency programs, and residency major research projects and their associations with the outcome of publication in a peer-reviewed journal. Methods: Pharmacy residents who graduated from one academic medical center between 2001 and 2012 were invited to participate via an electronic survey distributed in February 2014. The survey collected attributes of the resident, residency program, and research project. The outcome of publication was self-reported by residents in 2014 and updated in July 2019 using a validated search strategy. Results: This study included 53 resident graduates representing 66 major pharmacy residency projects. Eighteen (27%) projects were published, occurring at an average of 13.8 months after residency graduation. The outcome of publication was more likely for residents with human subjects research experience prior to PGY1 training, residency programs that cultivated resident expertise in Institutional Review Board submission and statistical analysis, and projects with Institutional Review Board approval, a larger number of co-investigators, non-pharmacy co-investigators, and a larger sample size. Conclusion: This cohort of residents, programs, and projects at an academic medical center identified many modifiable attributes that were associated with successful publication of resident research projects. Unfortunately, residency projects rarely used study design features that attenuate bias. Residents and preceptors were perceived as having limited expertise with statistical analysis and database management, which underscores the need to develop research infrastructure to enhance research training for pharmacy students, residents, and preceptors.

Safety of Intravenous Push Ertapenem Compared to Intravenous Piggyback at a Tertiary Academic Medical Center

2021 ◽  
pp. 089719002110383
Author(s):  
Michael J. Corrado ◽  
Andrew Riselli ◽  
Kevin C. McLaughlin ◽  
Paul M. Szumita ◽  
Kevin E. Anger
Keyword(s):  
Medical Center ◽  
Academic Medical Center ◽  
Healthcare Systems ◽  
Institutional Review Board ◽  
P Value ◽  
Single Center ◽  
Infusion Site ◽  
Patients Âgés ◽  
Institutional Review ◽  
Academic Medical

Background: Recent shortages of intravenous (IV) fluids have resulted in healthcare systems converting administration of many medications from IV piggyback (IVPB) to IV push (IVP). Administering medications via IVP presents numerous advantages; however, IV site reactions such as phlebitis and infiltration may occur. Objective: The objective of this analysis is to evaluate the infusion site safety of ertapenem given as peripheral IVP compared to IVPB in adult patients. Methods: This was an institutional review board–approved, single-center, retrospective study. Patients, ages 18 or older, receiving IV ertapenem were identified. The major endpoints analyzed were IV site reactions including phlebitis and infiltration. The Naranjo Nomogram was utilized to assess the causality of the reactions to determine the likelihood of whether the event was caused by the medication itself or other factors. Results: To date, 283 administrations (92 patients) in the IVP group and 319 administrations (82 patients) in the IVPB group were analyzed. There were 13 IV site reactions compared to 8 in the IVP vs IVPB group, respectively ( P-value = 0.16). Ten of the events in the IVP group were deemed “possible” and 2 deemed “doubtful,” while the remaining event was considered “probable” per the Naranjo Nomogram. Of the events in the IVPB group, all 8 were found to be “possible.” Conclusion: The administration of IVP ertapenem showed comparable rates of infusion site reactions compared to IVPB. Implementation of IVP ertapenem appears to be associated with infusion site safety similar to IVPB and should be considered safe to administer.

Reflection of an IRB Chair

1994 ◽  
Vol 3 (4) ◽  
pp. 506-509 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kenneth Craig Micetich
Keyword(s):  
Medical Center ◽  
Academic Medical Center ◽  
Nursing School ◽  
Institutional Review Board ◽  
Cancer Center ◽  
Medical Sciences ◽  
School Of Medicine ◽  
Institutional Review ◽  
Academic Medical ◽  
Chicago Medical

I have been a member of the Loyola University of Chicago, Medical Center Institutional Review Board (IRB) for 12 years and Chair for the last 4 years. The Medical Center Campus is a full-service academic medical center, providing tertiary and primary care to Chicago and its western suburbs. The campus houses a 520bed hospital, outpatient facilities, a cancer center, the graduate medical sciences, a nursing school, and the Loyola University Stritch School of Medicine.

scholarly journals 164. Avoiding Complacency: Assessing the Perceived Impact and Value of Antimicrobial Stewardship at a Academic Medical Center

2020 ◽  
Vol 7 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S90-S91
Author(s):  
Matthew S Lee ◽  
Christopher McCoy
Keyword(s):  
Antimicrobial Stewardship ◽  
Medical Center ◽  
Academic Medical Center ◽  
Clinical Decision ◽  
Team Members ◽  
Academic Medical ◽  
Support Tools ◽  
Educational Engagement ◽  
Similar Survey ◽  
Perceived Impact

Abstract Background Multi-disciplinary engagement and education remain key measures for Antimicrobial Stewardship Programs (ASPs). Over 3 years, our ASP has undergone key changes to pre-authorization review, post-prescriptive activities, and core team members, coinciding with a 30% increase in stewardship interventions. The objectives of this study were to evaluate the familiarity of Nursing, Pharmacy and Prescribers at our academic medical center regarding ASP activities and services, as well as perceived impact on patient care and value. Secondary objectives were to determine what resources are currently utilized and areas for improvement. Methods Distinct surveys were distributed to three participant groups: Nurses, Pharmacists, and Prescribers (Housestaff, Advanced Practice Providers, and staff physicians). Questions were developed to assess familiarity, perceived value, and overall satisfaction with the ASP. Additional items included questions on the current use of ASP resources and educational engagement. Survey results were compared to a similar survey conducted 3 years amongst the same participant groups. Results The survey was delivered electronically to 3367 Prescribers, Nurses and Pharmacists. 403 responders completed the survey (208 Nurses, 181 Prescribers, and 18 Pharmacists). Familiarity was lowest amongst Nurses, but almost doubled compared to 2016 (Figure). Prescribers cited “restricted antibiotic approval”, “de-escalation”, and “alternative therapies relative to allergies” as the three most common interaction types, similar to 2016. ASP interactions continued to be rated “moderate” or “high” value (88.4% vs 89.15% in 2016), however, face-to-face interactions were preferred by only 4% of responders (unchanged compared to 2016). Prescribers also responded uncommon use of ASP online resources (20%) and clinical decision support tools (34%). 78% of responders expressed desire for increased ASP-related education. Conclusion As ASPs evolve, it is important to constantly evaluate impact and value, and identify areas for growth. Despite ASP familiarity being high and interactions valued, we need to further optimize ASP provided resources, clinical support tools, and educational offerings. Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures

scholarly journals Qualitative exploration of the medical learner’s journey into correctional health care at an academic medical center and its implications for medical education

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ahmar H. Hashmi ◽  
Alina M. Bennett ◽  
Nadeem N. Tajuddin ◽  
Rebecca J. Hester ◽  
Jason E. Glenn
Keyword(s):  
Learning Environment ◽  
Clinical Decision Making ◽  
Ethical Issues ◽  
Medical Center ◽  
Academic Medical Center ◽  
Clinical Decision ◽  
Diagnostic Laboratory ◽  
Lower Priority ◽  
Academic Medical ◽  
Qualitative Exploration

Abstract Correctional systems in several U.S. states have entered into partnerships with academic medical centers (AMCs) to provide healthcare for persons who are incarcerated. One AMC specializing in the care of incarcerated patients is the University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston (UTMB), which hosts the only dedicated prison hospital in the U.S. and supplies 80% of the medical care for the entire Texas Department of Criminal Justice (TDCJ). Nearly all medical students and residents at UTMB take part in the care of the incarcerated. This research, through qualitative exploration using focus group discussions, sets out to characterize the correctional care learning environment medical trainees enter. Participants outlined an institutional culture of low prioritization and neglect that dominated the learning environment in the prison hospital, resulting in treatment of the incarcerated as second-class patients. Medical learners pointed to delays in care, both within the prison hospital and within the TDCJ system, where diagnostic, laboratory, and medical procedures were delivered to incarcerated patients at a lower priority compared to free-world patients. Medical learners elaborated further on ethical issues that included the moral judgment of those who are incarcerated, bias in clinical decision making, and concerns for patient autonomy. Medical learners were left to grapple with complex challenges like the problem of dual loyalties without opportunities to critically reflect upon what they experienced. This study finds that, without specific vulnerable populations training for both trainees and correctional care faculty to address these institutional dynamics, AMCs risk replicating a system of exploitation and neglect of incarcerated patients and thereby exacerbating health inequities.

scholarly journals The Effects of Medication Alerts on Prescriber Response in a Pediatric Hospital

2017 ◽  
Vol 08 (02) ◽  
pp. 491-501 ◽  
Author(s):  
Judith Dexheimer ◽  
Eric Kirkendall ◽  
Michal Kouril ◽  
Philip Hagedorn ◽  
Thomas Minich ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Medical Center ◽  
Academic Medical Center ◽  
Clinical Decision ◽  
The United States ◽  
Primary Outcome Measure ◽  
Time Of Day ◽  
Pediatric Hospital ◽  
Institutional Review ◽  
Electronic Alerts ◽  
Ideal Number

Summary Objective: More than 70% of hospitals in the United States have electronic health records (EHRs). Clinical decision support (CDS) presents clinicians with electronic alerts during the course of patient care; however, alert fatigue can influence a provider’s response to any EHR alert. The primary goal was to evaluate the effects of alert burden on user response to the alerts. Methods: We performed a retrospective study of medication alerts over a 24-month period (1/2013–12/2014) in a large pediatric academic medical center. The institutional review board approved this study. The primary outcome measure was alert salience, a measure of whether or not the prescriber took any corrective action on the order that generated an alert. We estimated the ideal number of alerts to maximize salience. Salience rates were examined for providers at each training level, by day of week, and time of day through logistic regressions. Results: While salience never exceeded 38%, 49 alerts/day were associated with maximal salience in our dataset. The time of day an order was placed was associated with alert salience (maximal salience 2am). The day of the week was also associated with alert salience (maximal salience on Wednesday). Provider role did not have an impact on salience. Conclusion: Alert burden plays a role in influencing provider response to medication alerts. An increased number of alerts a provider saw during a one-day period did not directly lead to decreased response to alerts. Given the multiple factors influencing the response to alerts, efforts focused solely on burden are not likely to be effective. Citation: Dexheimer JW, Kirkendall ES, Kouril M, Hagedorn PA, Minich T, Duan LL, Mahdi M, Szczesniak R, Spooner SA. The effects of medication alerts on prescriber response in a pediatric hospital. Appl Clin Inform 2017; 8: 491–501 https://doi.org/10.4338/ACI-2016-10-RA-0168

scholarly journals Once-Per-Visit Alerts: A Means to Study Alert Compliance and Reduce Repeat Laboratory Testing

2019 ◽  
Vol 65 (9) ◽  
pp. 1125-1131 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jeffrey J Szymanski ◽  
Abraham J Qavi ◽  
Kari Laux ◽  
Ronald Jackups
Keyword(s):  
Laboratory Testing ◽  
Multivariate Regression ◽  
Medical Center ◽  
Academic Medical Center ◽  
Clinical Decision ◽  
Patient Visit ◽  
Provider Type ◽  
Test Characteristics ◽  
Provider Characteristics ◽  
Academic Medical

Abstract BACKGROUND Clinical decision support alerts for laboratory testing have poor compliance. Once-per-visit alerts, triggered by reorder of a test within the same admission, are highly specific for unnecessary orders and provide a means to study alert compliance. METHODS Once-per-visit alerts for 18 laboratory orderables were analyzed over a 60-month period from September 2012 to October 2016 at a 1200-bed academic medical center. To determine correlates of alert compliance, we compared alerts by test and provider characteristics. RESULTS Overall alert compliance was 54.5%. In multivariate regression, compliance correlated with length of stay at time of alert, provider type, previous alerts in a patient visit, test ordered, total alerts experienced by ordering provider, and previous order status. CONCLUSIONS A diverse set of provider and test characteristics influences compliance with once-per-visit laboratory alerts. Future alerts should incorporate these characteristics into alert design to minimize alert overrides.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document