Determination of Particulate Matter and Alkaloids (as Nicotine) in Cigarette Smoke

1964 ◽  
Vol 47 (2) ◽  
pp. 356-362
Author(s):  
C L Ogg

Abstract A collaborative smoking study for the determination of particulate matter and nicotine deliveries of cigarettes, by a method chosen by the Analytical Methods Committee of the Tobacco Chemists’ Conference, was completed during the year. The 12 collaborators obtained coefficients of variation within laboratories of 4% and between laboratories of 10%. Each collaborator was asked to smoke 40 cigarettes (8 samples of 5 cigarettes). Non-filter (85 mm) cigarettes and filter (85 mm) cigarettes were analyzed. The cigarettes were conditioned for 24 hours at 75°F and 60% r.h. prior to selection for smoking. Cigarettes weighing within 20 mg of the average cigarette weight (50 randomly selected cigarettes) were marked to a 30 mm butt length. The cigarettes were smoked into a Cambridge filter holder by an automatic smoking machine which drew a 35 ml puff of 2-second duration once every minute. Five weight-selected cigarettes, marked to 30 mm butt, were smoked per Cambridge filter and the particulate matter (wet) was determined as the weight gain of the Cambridge filter. Nicotine delivery was determined by distilling the Cambridge filter pads and measuring the nicotine spectrophotometrically.

1969 ◽  
Vol 52 (3) ◽  
pp. 458-462 ◽  
Author(s):  
H C Pillsbury ◽  
C C Bright ◽  
K J O"Connor ◽  
F W Irish

Abstract Cigarettes were conditioned 24 hr at 75°F and 60% relative humidity prior to being selected and smoked in a random order. Cigarettes were smoked in a Cambridge filter holder on an automatic smoking machine to a pre-determined butt length. TPM wet collection was on a CM113A filter disk and was determined as the net weight gain in the Cambridge filter holder after smoking. The filter pads were extracted with dioxane-isopropanol solution and were analyzed for moisture by gas chromatography. The pads and solvent extracts were steam distilled and the distillate was analyzed spectrophotometrically for nicotine. TPM dry was calculated as TPM wet minus nicotine and water. The coefficient of variation in this method is less than 5% with a 95% confidence level.


1962 ◽  
Vol 45 (3) ◽  
pp. 540-545
Author(s):  
C L Ogg ◽  
W W Bates ◽  
E C Cogbill ◽  
R H Blackmore ◽  
E L Petersen

Author(s):  
S Moldoveanu ◽  
W III Coleman ◽  
J Wilkins

AbstractThis study describes the results regarding the evaluation of retention efficiency by humans of benzene and toluene from cigarette smoke. The evaluated cigarette was a common commercial cigarette with 10.6 mg ‘tar’ [U.S. Federal Trade Commission (FTC) ‘tar’ is defined as the weight of total particulate matter minus nicotine and water]. The test was performed on ten subjects. The exhaled smoke was collected using a vacuum assisted technique that avoids strain in exhaling the smoke. The study showed that benzene was retained at levels of 89% to 98%, and toluene was retained at similar levels, between 87% and 99%. The lower limits of retention for both benzene and toluene are unexpectedly low compared to the retention of bi-and tricyclic aromatic hydrocarbons, which have retentions from cigarette smoke above 95%. This is probably caused by the fact that monocyclic aromatic hydrocarbons are present practically only in the vapor phase of cigarette smoke and at considerably higher levels than bi- and tri-cyclic aromatic hydrocarbons which are present almost completely in the particulate phase of cigarette smoke.


1959 ◽  
Vol 31 (10) ◽  
pp. 1705-1709 ◽  
Author(s):  
W. B. Wartman ◽  
E. C. Cogbill ◽  
E. S. Harlow

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document