At Which Mean Glandular Dose Does the Benefit of Breast Cancer Deaths Averted Equal the Risk of Lives Lost to Screening From Radiation-induced Malignancy for Mammography With and Without Tomosynthesis?

Objective To estimate benefit-to-radiation-risk mean glandular dose (MGD) equivalence values for screening mammography, defined as the yearly MGD (over a 10-year period) at which the estimated benefit of mammography in terms of deaths averted equals the estimated risk of lives lost to screening due to radiation exposure (a benefit-to-risk ratio of 1). Methods Benefit-to-risk ratios were calculated as the ratio of breast cancer deaths averted and lives lost to screening over 10-year intervals starting at age 40 for mammography and tomosynthesis using previously published methodology. The MGD values at which estimated benefit equals risk were tabulated. Results The MGD values at which benefit-to-risk equivalence points were met for digital screening mammography are 63 milligray (mGy) (ages 40–49), 88 mGy (ages 50–59), 176 mGy (ages 60–69), and 336 mGy (ages 70–79). The MGD values that met benefit-to-risk equivalence for screening tomosynthesis plus digital mammography or synthetic mammography are 80 mGy (ages 40–49), 111 mGy (ages 50–59), 224 mGy (ages 60–69), and 427 mGy (ages 70–79). Conclusion Cutoff MGD values at which the estimated benefit from screening equals the estimated risk are well above standard screening MGD exposures. Care is necessary to ensure that threshold values are not exceeded during a screening exam, particularly for women ages 40–49 years old when using digital mammography plus tomosynthesis (due to an approximate doubling of dose per exam that will more readily exceed cutoff MGD values) and when many additional views are obtained.