scholarly journals The Current Status and Issues Regarding Hospital-based Specialized Palliative Care Service in Japanese Regional Cancer Centers: A Nationwide Questionnaire Survey

2012 ◽  
Vol 42 (5) ◽  
pp. 432-441 ◽  
Author(s):  
Y. Nakazawa ◽  
M. Miyashita ◽  
T. Morita ◽  
T. Misawa ◽  
S. Tsuneto ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Palliative Care ◽  
Questionnaire Survey ◽  
Care Service ◽  
Palliative Care Service ◽  
Current Status ◽  
Cancer Centers ◽  
Specialized Palliative Care

Late Referrals to Specialized Palliative Care Service in Japan

2005 ◽  
Vol 23 (12) ◽  
pp. 2637-2644 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tatsuya Morita ◽  
Tatsuo Akechi ◽  
Masayuki Ikenaga ◽  
Yoshiyuki Kizawa ◽  
Hiroyuki Kohara ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Palliative Care ◽  
End Of Life Care ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Care Service ◽  
Family Members ◽  
Palliative Care Service ◽  
Effective Response ◽  
Specialized Palliative Care ◽  
Palliative Care Units ◽  
Bereaved Family

Purpose To clarify the bereaved family's perceptions about the appropriateness of timing when physicians first referred patients to palliative care units, and to identify the factors contributing to family-perceived late referrals. Subjects and Methods A multicenter questionnaire survey was conducted on 630 bereaved family members of cancer patents who were admitted to palliative care units in Japan. A total of 318 responses were analyzed (effective response rate, 62%). Results Half of the bereaved family members regarded the timing of referrals to palliative care units as late or very late, while less than 5% of families reported early referrals (very late [19%, n = 59], late [30%, n = 96], appropriate [48%, n = 151], early [1.6%, n = 5], and very early [2.2%, n = 7]). Multiple regression analyses revealed that the independent determinants of family-perceived late referrals were: family belief before admission that palliative care shortens the patient's life, insufficient in-advance discussion about preferred end-of-life care between patients/families and physicians, families' insufficient preparation for changes of patient conditions, and hospital admission before referrals. Conclusion In Japan, the timing of referrals to palliative care units was late or very late from the families' perspectives. The independent determinants of family-perceived late referrals were: family misconception about palliative care, inadequate communication with physicians, and families' insufficient preparation for deterioration of patients' conditions. Systematic strategies to overcome these barriers would contribute to providing appropriate palliative care at all stages of cancer.

Referral Practices of Oncologists to Specialized Palliative Care

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (35) ◽  
pp. 4380-4386 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kirsten Wentlandt ◽  
Monika K. Krzyzanowska ◽  
Nadia Swami ◽  
Gary M. Rodin ◽  
Lisa W. Le ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Palliative Care ◽  
Care Service ◽  
Palliative Care Service ◽  
Surgical Oncology ◽  
Disease Course ◽  
Radiation Oncologists ◽  
Canadian Association ◽  
Medical Oncologists ◽  
Referral Practices ◽  
Specialized Palliative Care

Purpose To describe current referral practices of oncologists to specialized palliative care (SPC) and define demographic characteristics, practice situations, and opinions associated with referral. Methods Physician members of the Canadian Association of Medical Oncologists, Canadian Association of Radiation Oncologists, and Canadian Society of Surgical Oncology were invited to participate in an anonymous survey assessing SPC referral practices. Participants received two e-mailed and two mailed invitations. Results The response rate was 72% (603 of 839 physicians); 37% were medical oncologists/hematologists, 50% were radiation oncologists, and 12% were surgical oncologists. Ninety-four percent reported that SPC was available to them, but only 37% reported that these services accepted patients on chemotherapy. Eighty-four percent referred terminally ill patients usually/always, but generally for uncontrolled symptoms or discharge planning late in the disease course. One third would refer to SPC earlier if it was renamed supportive care. Predictors of higher referral frequency included comprehensiveness of available SPC services (P = .004), satisfaction with SPC availability (P < .001), SPC acceptance of patients receiving chemotherapy (P < .001), and oncologist ease with referring patients to a palliative care service before they were close to death (P < .001). Controlling for specialty, predictors of referral at diagnosis or during chemotherapy, rather than later, included satisfaction with SPC service availability (P < .001) and SPC service acceptance of patients on chemotherapy (P < .001). Conclusion Oncologists referred patients frequently to SPC, but generally late in the disease course for patients with uncontrolled symptoms. Availability of comprehensive SPC, especially for patients receiving chemotherapy, and persisting definitional issues seem to be the main barriers preventing timely referral.

Similar levels of symptoms and problems were found among patients referred to specialized palliative care by general practitioners and hospital physicians: A nationwide register-based study of 31,139 cancer patients

2020 ◽  
Vol 34 (8) ◽  
pp. 1118-1126
Author(s):  
Maiken Bang Hansen ◽  
Lone Ross ◽  
Morten Aagaard Petersen ◽  
Mathilde Adsersen ◽  
Leslye Rojas-Concha ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Palliative Care ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Care Service ◽  
Palliative Care Service ◽  
Regression Analyses ◽  
Hospital Physician ◽  
Appetite Loss ◽  
Specialized Palliative Care ◽  
Care Database ◽  
Different Parts

Background: Previous studies suggest that the symptomatology threshold (i.e. the level and types of symptoms) for a referral to specialized palliative care might differ for doctors in different parts of the healthcare system; however, it has not yet been investigated. Aim: To investigate if the number and level of symptoms/problems differed for patients referred from the primary and secondary healthcare sectors (i.e. general practitioner versus hospital physician). Setting/participants: Adult cancer patients registered in the Danish Palliative Care Database who reported their symptoms/problems at admittance to specialized palliative care between 2010 and 2017 were included. Ordinal logistic regression analyses were performed with each symptom/problem as outcome to study the association between referral sector and symptoms/problems, controlled for the effect of gender, age, cancer diagnosis and the specialized palliative care service referred to. Results: The study included 31,139 patients. The average age was 69 years and 49% were women. Clinically neglectable associations were found between referral sector and pain, appetite loss, fatigue, number of symptoms/problems, number of severe symptoms/problems (odds ratios between 1.05 and 1.20, all p < 0.05) and physical functioning (odds ratio = 0.81 (inpatient care) and 1.32 (outpatient), both p < 0.05). The remaining six outcomes were not significantly associated with referral sector. Conclusion: Differences across healthcare sectors in, for example, competences and patient population did not seem to result in different symptomatology thresholds for referring patients to palliative care since only small, and probably not clinically relevant, differences in symptomatology was found across referral sectors.

scholarly journals Development and preliminary evaluation of a communication skills training programme for hospital physicians by a specialized palliative care service: the ‘Teach to Talk’ programme

2020 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
S. Tanzi ◽  
L. De Panfilis ◽  
M. Costantini ◽  
G. Artioli ◽  
S. Alquati ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Palliative Care ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Communication Skills ◽  
Care Service ◽  
Palliative Care Service ◽  
Implementation Process ◽  
Skills Training ◽  
Training Programme ◽  
Communication Skills Training ◽  
Specialized Palliative Care

Abstract Background There is widespread agreement about the importance of communication skills training (CST) for healthcare professionals caring for cancer patients. Communication can be effectively learned and improved through specific CST. Existing CSTs have some limitations with regard to transferring the learning to the workplace. The aim of the study is developing, piloting, and preliminarily assessing a CST programme for hospital physicians caring for advanced cancer patients to improve communication competences. Methods This is a Phase 0-I study that follows the Medical Research Council framework; this paper describes the following sections: a literature review on CST, the development of the Teach to Talk training programme (TtT), the development of a procedure for assessing the quality of the implementation process and assessing the feasibility of the implementation process, and the pilot programme. The study was performed at a 900-bed public hospital. The programme was implemented by the Specialized Palliative Care Service. The programme was proposed to 19 physicians from 2 departments. Results The different components of the training course were identified, and a set of quality indicators was developed. The TtT programme was implemented; all the physicians attended the lesson, videos, and role-playing sessions. Only 25% of the physicians participated in the bedside training. It was more challenging to involve Haematology physicians in the programme. Conclusions The programme was completed as established for one of the two departments in which it was piloted. Thus, in spite of the good feedback from the trainees, a re-piloting of a different training program will be developed, considering in particular the bed side component. The program should be tailored on specific communication attitude and believes, probably different between different specialties.

scholarly journals Appropriate Referral Timing To Specialized Palliative Care Service: Survey of Bereaved Families of Cancer Patients Who Died in Palliative Care Units

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Keita Tagami ◽  
Kento Masukawa ◽  
Akira Inoue ◽  
Tatsuya Morita ◽  
Yusuke Hiratsuka ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Palliative Care ◽  
Cancer Treatment ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Care Service ◽  
Palliative Care Service ◽  
Death Process ◽  
Incurable Cancer ◽  
Anti Cancer ◽  
Specialized Palliative Care ◽  
Palliative Care Units

Abstract Few studies have investigated appropriate referral timing of specialized palliative care (SPC) from the perspective of cancer patients’ and families’ experiences. We aimed to clarify appropriate SPC referral timing for patients with advanced cancer and their families. We used data from a nationwide bereaved family survey in Japan. We sent a questionnaire to 999 bereaved families of cancer patients who died in 164 palliative care units (PCUs) and analyzed the first SPC referral timing and how patients evaluated it. We defined SPC as outpatient or inpatient palliative care service comprising certified palliative care physicians, advanced-practice nurses, and multidisciplinary practitioners. Finally, 51.6% (n = 515) of all responses were analyzed. The SPC referral timing was evaluated as appropriate (26.1%), late or too late (20.2%), early or too early (1.2%), and none of these (52.5%). Of these, 32.3% reported that they were referred to an SPC when diagnosed with advanced or incurable cancer or during anti-cancer treatment, and 62.6% reported they were referred after anti-cancer treatment. Patient-perceived appropriateness of SPC referral timing was associated with their good death process. After excluding “none of these” responses, a significantly higher proportion of respondents who reported being referred to SPC at diagnosis and during anti-cancer treatment evaluated the response timing as appropriate, compared to those who reported being referred after anti-cancer treatment. Appropriate timing for SPC referrals relates to quality of death; findings suggest that appropriate timing is at the time of diagnosis or during anti-cancer treatment.

scholarly journals Trends in specialized palliative care referrals at an oncology center from 2007 to 2019

2021 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Lucka Boltezar ◽  
Barbara Jezersek Novakovic ◽  
Maja Ebert Moltara
Keyword(s):  
Palliative Care ◽  
Lung Tumor ◽  
Care Service ◽  
Real Life ◽  
Palliative Care Service ◽  
Standard Of Care ◽  
Positive Trend ◽  
Breast Cancer Patients ◽  
Early Referral ◽  
Specialized Palliative Care

Abstract Background Early referral to palliative care, at least 3 months before death, should be a standard of care in oncological practice. Real life data in this setting are invaluable since they provide a picture of everyday practice and serve as the basis for future improvements. Methods We conducted a retrospective cohort assessment of all patients referred to our specialized palliative care (SPC) services at the Institute of Oncology, Ljubljana, Slovenia. Our analysis includes patient referrals between 2007 and 2019. Results During the above-specified time period of 13 years, 3234 patients were referred for SPC services at our institution. The median age at SPC referral was 67 years. The majority of patients (63%) were assessed only once, while 31% of patients were seen on more than one occasion. Median time from SPC referral to death was 25 days for the whole group. 1693 patients (52.7%) were referred to SPC in the last 30 days before death, 785 (25.8%) patients between 31 and 90 days and 652 (21.4%) patients more than 3 months before death. Neither age nor sex correlated with the duration of referral time. However, there was a strong correlation between the year of referral to palliative care and the duration of palliative care service (ρ = 0.19, p < 0.001). The median referral to death interval for lymphoma patients and breast cancer patients were 15 and 18 days, respectively, and the median referral to death interval for colorectal cancer and lung tumor patients were 34 and 26 days before death, respectively. Conclusion Throughout the existence of our SPC services we have observed a positive trend in the number of referrals, a lengthening of time between referral and death, as well as an increase in the proportion of patients with an early referral to SPC (more than 3 months before death). Neither age nor sex correlated with the length of referral time.

scholarly journals 77 National Audit of Care At the End of Life (NACEL)—Round Two Findings

2021 ◽  
Vol 50 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. i12-i42
Author(s):  
D Hibbert
Keyword(s):  
Palliative Care ◽  
End Of Life ◽  
Care Service ◽  
Palliative Care Service ◽  
Care Plan ◽  
Specialist Palliative Care ◽  
Experience Of Care ◽  
Outcomes Of Care ◽  
Specialist Palliative Care Service ◽  
The Right

Abstract   NACEL is a national comparative audit of the quality and outcomes of care experienced by the dying person and those important to them during the final admission in acute and community hospitals in England and Wales. Mental health inpatient providers participated in the first round but excluded from the second round. NACEL round two, undertaken during 2019/20, comprised: Data was collected between June and October 2019. 175 trusts in England and 8 Welsh organisations took part in at least one element of NACEL (97% of eligible organisations). Key findings include Recognising the possibility of imminent death: The possibility that the patient may die was documented in 88% of cases. The median time from recognition of dying to death was 41 hours (36 hours in the first round). Individual plan of care: 71% of patients, where it had been recognised that the patient was dying (Category 1 deaths), had an individualised end of life care plan. Of the patients who did not have an individualised plan of care, in 45% of these cases, the time from recognition of dying to death was more than 24 hours. Families’ and others’ experience of care: 80% of Quality Survey respondents rated the quality of care delivered to the patient as outstanding/excellent/good and 75% rated the care provided to families/others as outstanding/excellent/good. However, one-fifth of responses reported that the families’/others’ needs were not asked about. Individual plan of care: 80% of Quality Survey respondents believed that hospital was the “right” place to die; however, 20% reported there was a lack of peace and privacy. Workforce Most hospitals (99%) have access to a specialist palliative care service. 36% of hospitals have a face-to-face specialist palliative care service (doctor and/or nurse) available 8 hours a day, 7 days a week. NACEL round three will start in 2021.

scholarly journals The association between ethnicity, socioeconomic deprivation and receipt of hospital-based palliative care for people with Covid-19: A dual centre service evaluation

2021 ◽  
pp. 026921632110229
Author(s):  
Sabrina Bajwah ◽  
Polly Edmonds ◽  
Emel Yorganci ◽  
Rosemary Chester ◽  
Kirsty Russell ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Palliative Care ◽  
Ethnic Minority ◽  
Primary Outcome ◽  
Minority Groups ◽  
Care Service ◽  
Palliative Care Service ◽  
Service Evaluation ◽  
Socioeconomic Deprivation ◽  
Black British ◽  
Multivariable Regression

Background: People from ethnic minority groups and deprived socioeconomic backgrounds have worse outcomes from COVID-19. Aim: To examine associations between ethnicity and deprivation with timing of palliative care referral for inpatients with COVID-19. Design: Service evaluation of consecutive patients with COVID-19 referred to palliative care. Sociodemographic (including age, sex, Index of Multiple Deprivation, ethnicity coded as White/non-White) and clinical variables were described. The primary outcome was timing of referral to palliative care. Associations between ethnicity and socioeconomic deprivation with the primary outcome were explored using multivariable regression. Setting/participants: Patients with COVID-19 referred to a hospital palliative care service across two London hospitals February–May 2020. Results: A total of 334 patients were included. 119 (36%) were from a non-White ethnic group; most commonly Black British (77, 23%) and Asian British (26, 8%). A longer time between admission and palliative care referral was associated with male gender (IRR 1.23, 95% CI 1.14–1.34) and lower levels of socioeconomic deprivation (IRR 1.61, 95% CI 1.36–1.90) but not ethnicity (IRR = 0.96, 95% CI 0.87–1.06). Conclusions: This large service evaluation showed no evidence that patients from ethnic minority or more deprived socioeconomic groups had longer time to palliative care referral. Ongoing data monitoring is essential for equitable service delivery.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document