Modeling Systemic Risk: Time-Varying Tail Dependence When Forecasting Marginal Expected Shortfall

2017 ◽  
Vol 16 (1) ◽  
pp. 63-117 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tobias Eckernkemper
Risks ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
pp. 26
Author(s):  
Veni Arakelian ◽  
Shatha Qamhieh Hashem

We examine the lead-lag effect between the large and the small capitalization financial institutions by constructing two global weekly rebalanced indices. We focus on the 10% of stocks that “survived” all the rebalancings by remaining constituents of the indices. We sort them according to their systemic importance using the marginal expected shortfall (MES), which measures the individual institutions’ vulnerability over the market, the network based MES, which captures the vulnerability of the risks generated by institutions’ interrelations, and the Bayesian network based MES, which takes into account different network structures among institutions’ interrelations. We also check if the lead-lag effect holds in terms of systemic risk implying systemic risk transmission from the large to the small capitalization, concluding a mixed behavior compared to the index returns. Additionally, we find that all the systemic risk indicators increase their magnitude during the financial crisis.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Denisa Banulescu-Radu ◽  
Christophe Hurlin ◽  
Jérémy Leymarie ◽  
Olivier Scaillet

This paper proposes an original approach for backtesting systemic risk measures. This backtesting approach makes it possible to assess the systemic risk measure forecasts used to identify the financial institutions that contribute the most to the overall risk in the financial system. Our procedure is based on simple tests similar to those generally used to backtest the standard market risk measures such as value-at-risk or expected shortfall. We introduce a concept of violation associated with the marginal expected shortfall (MES), and we define unconditional coverage and independence tests for these violations. We can generalize these tests to any MES-based systemic risk measures such as the systemic expected shortfall (SES), the systemic risk measure (SRISK), or the delta conditional value-at-risk ([Formula: see text]CoVaR). We study their asymptotic properties in the presence of estimation risk and investigate their finite sample performance via Monte Carlo simulations. An empirical application to a panel of U.S. financial institutions is conducted to assess the validity of MES, SRISK, and [Formula: see text]CoVaR forecasts issued from a bivariate GARCH model with a dynamic conditional correlation structure. Our results show that this model provides valid forecasts for MES and SRISK when considering a medium-term horizon. Finally, we propose an early warning system indicator for future systemic crises deduced from these backtests. Our indicator quantifies how much is the measurement error issued by a systemic risk forecast at a given point in time which can serve for the early detection of global market reversals. This paper was accepted by Kay Giesecke, finance.


Author(s):  
John Weirstrass Muteba Mwamba ◽  
Serge Esef Angaman

In this study, a dynamic mixture copula is used to estimate the marginal expected shortfall in the South African insurance sector. While other studies assumed nonlinear dependence to be static over time, our model capture time-varying nonlinear dependence between institutions and the market. In order to capture time-varying nonlinear dependence, the generalized autoregressive score (GAS) is used to model the dynamic copula parameters. Furthermore, our study implements a ranking that expresses to what degree individual insurers are systemically important in South Africa. We use daily stock return of five South African insurers listed in the Johannesburg Stock Exchange (JSE) from November 13, 2007 to June 15, 2020. We find that Sanlam and Discovery contribute the most to systemic risk, while Santam is found to be the least contributor to the overall systemic risk in the South African insurance sector. Our findings would be of paramount importance for the South African regulators as they would be informed that not only banks are systemically important, but some insurers also are systemically important financial institutions. Hence, stricter regulation of these institutions in the form of higher capital and loss absorbency requirements could be required based on the individual business activities undertaken by the company.


2020 ◽  
Vol 23 (1) ◽  
pp. 101-120
Author(s):  
Mutiara Aini ◽  
Deddy Priatmodjo Koesrindartoto

This paper examines the determinants of systemic risk across Indonesian commercialbanks using quarterly data from 2001Q4 to 2017Q4. Employing four measures ofsystemic risk, namely value-at-risk (VaR), historical marginal expected shortfall(MESH), marginal expected shortfall from GARCH-DCC (MESdcc), and long-runmarginal expected shortfall (LRMES), we find that bank size is positively related tosystemic risk, whereas banks and economic loan activity are negatively related tosystemic risk. These findings suggest that the government needs to regulate loanactivities and to monitor big banks as they have significant impacts on bank systemicrisk.


2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Χριστόφορος Κωνσταντάτος

Η παρούσα διατριβή ερευνά διάφορα μέτρα συστημικού κινδύνου, αναγνωρίζοντας – προσδιορίζοντάς τα συστημικά τραπεζικά ιδρύματα της Ευρωπαϊκής Νομισματικής Ένωσής (Ευρωζώνης). Επίσης εξετάζει τις ακραίες κινήσεις της τιμής των μετοχών των τραπεζικών ιδρυμάτων της Ευρωζώνης. Η παρούσα αποτελείται από τρία κεφάλαια εστιάζοντας στα τραπεζικά ιδρύματα των Ηνωμένων Πολιτειών και της Ευρωζώνης. Το Κεφάλαιο 2 συγκρίνει τα συστημικά μέτρα τα επονομαζόμενα (i) Delta Conditional Value at Risk, (ii) Marginal Expected Shortfall και (iii) Systemic RISK. Τα αποτελέσματα καταδεικνύουν ότι τα τραπεζικά ιδρύματα της ζώνης του ευρώ συνεισφέρουν τον υψηλότερο κίνδυνο στο χρηματοπιστωτικό σύστημα (συμβολή στον συστημικό κίνδυνο). Επιπροσθέτως είναι και τα πιο ευάλωτα τραπεζικά ιδρύματα σε περίπτωση ύφεσης. Τα τραπεζικά ιδρύματα με τις υψηλότερες αναμενόμενες απώλειες σε περίπτωση ακραίων γεγονότων είναι κυρίως τα τραπεζικά ιδρύματα των ΗΠΑ. Το Κεφάλαιο 3 διερευνά τον συστημικό κίνδυνο που διαχέεται μεταξύ των τραπεζικών ιδρυμάτων των Ηνωμένων Πολιτειών και της Ευρωζώνης κάνοντας χρήση του μέτρου Conditional Value at Risk. Τα αποτελέσματα καταδεικνύουν ότι δύο από τα μεγαλύτερα γερμανικά τραπεζικά ιδρύματα συγκαταλέγονται στα πιο ευάλωτα τραπεζικά ιδρύματα της ζώνης του ευρώ στον συστημικό κινδύνου που προέρχονται από τα αντίστοιχα αμερικανικά τραπεζικά ιδρύματα, επίσης παρατηρείτε υψηλός βαθμός έκθεσης των αμερικανικών τραπεζικών ιδρυμάτων στα τρία μεγαλύτερα γαλλικά τραπεζικά ιδρύματα. Το Κεφάλαιο 4 ερευνά τη δομή εξάρτησης των ουρών των είκοσι τεσσάρων μεγαλύτερων τραπεζών στη ζώνη του ευρώ πριν και μετά την κατάρρευση της Lehman Brothers. Τα αποτελέσματα καταδεικνύουν ότι στη μετά κρίση περίοδο το επίπεδο της ακραίας συσχέτισης αυξάνεται σημαντικά στα τραπεζικά ιδρύματα του πυρήνα του ευρώ. Επίσης, μεταξύ των χωρών που λαμβάνουν δέσμη μέτρων διάσωσης τα μεγαλύτερα τραπεζικά ιδρύματα σε Ελλάδα και Ιρλανδία παρατηρείτε ότι μείωσαν την ακραία συσχέτιση με τα αντίστοιχα τραπεζικά ιδρύματα της ζώνης του ευρώ.


2020 ◽  
Vol 25 (2) ◽  
pp. 115-134
Author(s):  
Kourosh Asayesh ◽  
Mirfeiz Fallahshams ◽  
Hossein Jahangirnia ◽  
Reza Gholami Jamkarani ◽  
◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Denisa Banulescu ◽  
Christophe Hurlin ◽  
Jeremy Leymarie ◽  
Olivier Scaillet

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document