The Response to Stress Questionnaire for Parents Following Neonatal Brain Injury

2020 ◽  
Vol 45 (9) ◽  
pp. 1005-1015
Author(s):  
Kyla P McDonald ◽  
Jennifer Connolly ◽  
Samantha D Roberts ◽  
Meghan K Ford ◽  
Robyn Westmacott ◽  
...  

Abstract Objective The Response to Stress Questionnaire-Brain Injury (RSQ-BI) was adapted utilizing a patient-oriented approach, exploring parental stress, coping, and associated mental health outcomes in parents of children with neonatal brain injury. The contributions of social risk, child adaptive functioning, and brain injury severity were also explored. Methods Using a mixed-method design, this study explored adapted stressor items on the RSQ-BI. Parents and clinicians engaged in semistructured interviews to examine key stressors specific to being a parent of a child with neonatal brain injury. The adapted RSQ-BI was piloted in a parent sample (N = 77, child mean age 1 year 7 months) with established questionnaires of social risk, child adaptive functioning, severity of the child’s injury, coping style, and parent mental health. Descriptive statistics and correlations examined parent stress, coping, and their association with parent mental health. Results The final RSQ-BI questionnaire included 15 stressors. Factor analysis showed stressors loaded onto two factors related to (a) daily role stressors and (b) brain injury stressors. Using the RSQ-BI, parents reported brain injury stressors as more stressful than daily role stressors. When faced with these stressors, parents were most likely to engage in acceptance-based coping strategies and demonstrated lower symptoms of parent depression and anxiety. Conclusions The RSQ-BI provides a valuable adaptation to understand both stressors and coping specific to being a parent of a child with neonatal brain injury. Relevant interventions that promote similar coping techniques are discussed for future care and research.

2019 ◽  
Vol 25 (04) ◽  
pp. 390-402 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tricia S. Williams ◽  
Kyla P. McDonald ◽  
Samantha D. Roberts ◽  
Robyn Westmacott ◽  
Nomazulu Dlamini ◽  
...  

AbstractObjectives:The current study used a mixed-method design to qualitatively examine parents’ definitions of resilience and factors they believed optimized their child’s early outcome following neonatal brain injury. This was followed by quantitative analyses of early developmental and mental health outcomes and their relation to salient biopsychosocial factors.Methods:Participants were parents of children diagnosed with neonatal brain injury due to stroke or hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy (N=51; age range of children 18 months to 8 years). The Parent Experiences Questionnaire (PEQ) was used to qualitatively analyze parents’ open-ended responses about their child’s early experiences and outcome. The Child Behavior Checklist (CBCL) and Scales of Independent Behaviour Early Developmental Form (SIB-ED) parent ratings were used to measure child resilience from a quantitative perspective, identifying “at-risk” and “resilient” children using standard cutoffs. “Resilient” and “at-risk” children were compared on biopsychosocial variables using univariatettests and chi-square analyses.Results:Parents provided five unique definitions of their child’s positive outcomes, and many children demonstrated resilience based on parent perspectives and quantitative definitions. Supporting factors included close medical follow-up, early intervention, and intrinsic factors within the child and parent. Group comparisons of “resilient” and “at-risk” children highlighted the importance of parent mental health across these early developmental and mental health outcomes.Conclusions:Many children were described as resilient during the early years by parents using qualitative and quantitative approaches. Findings highlighted the importance of parent well-being in promoting optimal early outcomes. (JINS, 2019,25, 390–402.)


2005 ◽  
Vol 36 (02) ◽  
Author(s):  
U Felderhoff-Mueser ◽  
AM Kaindl ◽  
C Bührer ◽  
H Ikonomidou

2006 ◽  
Vol preprint (2008) ◽  
pp. 1
Author(s):  
Vincenzo Zanardo ◽  
Stefania Vedovato ◽  
Agnese Suppiej ◽  
Daniele Trevisanuto ◽  
Mauro Migliore ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Rukhmani Narayanamurthy ◽  
Jung-Lynn Jonathan Yang ◽  
Jerome Y. Yager ◽  
Larry D. Unsworth

2011 ◽  
Vol 70 (1) ◽  
pp. 3-9 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cesar V Borlongan ◽  
Michael D Weiss

2015 ◽  
Vol 16 (8) ◽  
pp. 18018-18032 ◽  
Author(s):  
Miki Mori ◽  
Keiichi Matsubara ◽  
Yuko Matsubara ◽  
Yuka Uchikura ◽  
Hisashi Hashimoto ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document