Australia

Author(s):  
Douglas Fisher

This chapter examines the structure and substance of environmental law in Australia. It begins with a discussion of how powers are distributed in environmental governance in Australia, taking into account the law’s constitutional basis, and more specifically the division of legislative capacity between the states and the Commonwealth, as well as the relationship between Commonwealth and state legislation in practice. It then considers environmental protection, with a focus on protection from pollution and harm, conservation of environmental values, and the emergence of a complex system to facilitate ecologically sustainable development. It also analyses the implementation framework for Australian environmental law, emphasizing the importance of credible information and analysis in making decisions about the future use of the environment and about past actions impacting on it. Finally, it explores the nature of sanctions and remedies, including compliance with liability rules and decision-making rules as well as the nature of environmental litigation.

2004 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
pp. 62-75 ◽  
Author(s):  
Klaus Bosselmann

AbstractWestern legal traditions are anthropocentric in character and largely hostile to ecological principles. However, domestic and international environmental law show signs of an ecocentric orientation. In the search for a legal framework for ecologically sustainable development the Earth Charter marks an important step forward. Among its ground-breaking principles are ecologically defined concepts of sustainability, justice and rights.


Author(s):  
AA Du Plessis

This note explores the interrelationship between ecologically sustainable development (the green environmental agenda) and pro-poor urban development and environmental health (the brown environmental agenda) in relation to local government in South Africa. The meaning and relevance of the brown agenda versus the green agenda in environmental governance are discussed in general. This discussion subsequently feeds into the argument that South Africa's constitutional environmental right also foresees the advancement of the brown environmental agenda, which has implications for the interpretation and enforcement of local government's service delivery mandate. This link between municipal service delivery and the environmental right further informs understanding of what is required of government to fulfill this right. This paper is thus devoted to an introductory conceptual framing of South Africa's environmental right that goes beyond the green agenda. This impacts on how the constitutional duties of municipalities are interpreted and executed.


Author(s):  
Jan Glazewski

This chapter examines the environmental law of South Africa. It first considers how powers are allocated with regards to environmental law, taking into account the constitutional and other bases of South African environmental law, the elevated status of international law in South African domestic law, relevant provisions of the Bill of Rights with respect to environmental rights and sustainable development, and distribution of competences among national, provincial, and local governments regarding environmental governance. The chapter goes on to discuss the structure and substance of South Africa’s environmental law, focusing on the National Environmental Management Act (NEMA) and the environmental principles and sectorial laws it contains. It also analyses the implementation framework for environmental law, describing cooperative governance in practice and the role of relevant governmental departments from integration to sectorialization. Finally, it provides an overview of the legal conundrums created by the so-called One Environmental System (OES).


Author(s):  
LJ Kotzé

Administrative law, and more specifically administrative justice, is becoming increasingly important in the context of environmental law. The enforcement of environmental law depends to a large extent on administrative decision-making by environmental authorities. A developer who whishes to undertake a development activity that may have a detrimental effect on the environment, will require an environmental authorization that must be granted by the relevant environmental authority. There may be certain instance where the application for such an authorization is unduly delayed, or where there are mala fides on the part of the relevant authority. This may inevitably infringe the right of the developer to, inter alia, administrative justice. It is argued in this article that the developer has certain constitutional rights which can be invoked when dealing with environmental authorities. Hence, the discussion in this article focuses on the relationship between administrative justice and environmental governance; the constitutional rights of the developer; and recent case law that supports the proposal that the developer has legal recourse when her right to administrative justice has been infringed. 


Author(s):  
Chaitra Rangappa Beerannavar

Industrial development of the past 200 years has brought immeasurable wealth and prosperity. However, it has also caused an unintended eco-logical degradation. Hence, the focus of environmental law has shifted from the creation of global frameworks to deal with environmental problems to comply with those frameworks. As a result, the primary actors in environmental law have shifted from the state and the global community to corporations. As a consequence, environmental policies must develop along legally holistic lines. The role corporations have had in achieving ecological sustainability is poorly understood. In the backdrop of the above issues, the chapter examines the implications of ecologically sustainable development for corporations. It articulates corporate ecological sustainability through the concepts of environmental management and ecologically sustainable competitive strategies. It further examines the implications that these concepts have for a corporation in the long run.


Author(s):  
Jérémie Gilbert

This chapter focuses on the connection between the international legal framework governing the conservation of natural resources and human rights law. The objective is to examine the potential synergies between international environmental law and human rights when it comes to the protection of natural resources. To do so, it concentrates on three main areas of potential convergence. It first focuses on the pollution of natural resources and analyses how human rights law offers a potential platform to seek remedies for the victims of pollution. It next concentrates on the conservation of natural resources, particularly on the interconnection between protected areas, biodiversity, and human rights law. Finally, it examines the relationship between climate change and human rights law, focusing on the role that human rights law can play in the development of the current climate change adaptation and mitigation frameworks.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document