Part III Emergency Arbitration Procedure, 6 The Seat of Emergency Arbitration

Author(s):  
Sim Cameron

This chapter focuses on the limited role of the seat of emergency arbitration. It begins by exploring the concept of transnational norms in international arbitration, how these have been applied in the context of emergency arbitration, and whether this application is appropriate. The acceptance of a greater role for the application of transnational norms in emergency arbitration impacts on the significance of the role of the seat of emergency arbitration, and in particular, on the relevance of the lex arbitri to the proceedings. Given the limited mandate of the emergency arbitrator to determine whether urgent relief is required prior to tribunal formation, the courts of the seat of emergency arbitration are also not required to support the emergency arbitration process, although it is possible that they may be called upon to determine a challenge to the emergency arbitrator. However, the nationality of the emergency arbitrator's decision, if it is seen to constitute an award, may be relevant for enforcement purposes. The chapter then looks at the designation and the legal significance of the seat of emergency arbitration.

Author(s):  
Sophie Nappert

It has been posited that the international arbitration process carries with it not only fact-finding and lawmaking functions but also a governance function insofar as “arbitrators … can and do engage in autonomous normative action while still adhering to the rule of law.” This contribution explores the role and ambit of the exercise of discretion by international arbitration tribunals and its interplay with the tribunals’ governance function, as arbitrators must consider “the impact of their rulings on states, persons or entities not directly represented in the case before them.” It questions whether the use of discretion is suited to the governance role of arbitral tribunals and serves, rather than compromises, the effective exercise of that role. It asks what measures ought to be considered to make arbitrators better prepared for the exercise of their governance function.


Author(s):  
Burnett Henry G ◽  
Bret Louis-Alexis

This chapter discusses arbitration for international mining disputes. Such disputes often involve parties from different countries often with different legal systems and cultures. Arbitration in a neutral forum, with independent and impartial decision-makers, as opposed to litigation in the national courts of one party or the other, is, in most cases, the preferred international dispute resolution mechanism. Some of the more well-known international institutions include the International Chamber of Commerce (ICC), London Court of International Arbitration (LCIA), International Centre for Dispute Resolution (ICDR), and the International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes (ICSID). The remainder of the chapter provides a general overview of the role of national courts in connection with the international arbitration process and some of the primary issues that involve consideration by national courts.


2019 ◽  
Vol 73 (sup1) ◽  
pp. 91-98 ◽  
Author(s):  
Raymond Hubbard ◽  
Brian D. Haig ◽  
Rahul A. Parsa

1969 ◽  
Vol 8 (I1) ◽  
pp. xi-xii

The contents of ILM for the period from 1962 to 1969 reflect several significant developments: (1) the entry on the international scene of many new countries and their establishment of relations with the developed countries, particularly in the fields of commerce and trade and of investment; (2) the prevalence of armed conflict and the use of military force in the unsettled conditions resulting from the decolonization process and from continued antagonisms between the superpowers; (3) the pervasive role of international organizations, both global and regional, general and specialized; and (4) the continued predominance of national courts in the judicial consideration of questions of international law and the shift from general to specialized tribunals in the resolution of disputes by international arbitration and adjudication.


2018 ◽  
Vol 9 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xiaoxiao Zhang ◽  
Siling Hu ◽  
Jia Su ◽  
Zixuan Xie ◽  
Wenjing Li ◽  
...  

1974 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-7 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jacob Marschak

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document