7 The Emergence of International Human Rights Law (1969)

Author(s):  
Pace John P

This chapter addresses the emergence of International Human Rights Law. International Human Rights Law consists of international norms set out in instruments adopted over the years. These consist of binding instruments, which carry obligations (such as ‘covenant’, ‘convention’ and ‘protocol’) and non-binding instruments (such as ‘declaration’, ‘guiding principles’, ‘basic principles’ and ‘standard minimum rules’, also described as ‘soft’ law). They are all related, directly or indirectly, to the rights in the International Bill of Human Rights, which may be considered as the substantive canopy of International Human Rights Law. As the International Bill of Human Rights was reaching completion in the mid-1960s, a process developed that complemented the International Bill with conventions on specific rights, protecting (vulnerable) groups, such as the child, women, persons with disabilities and migrant workers, and conventions protecting against the violation of specific rights, such as freedom from racial discrimination, freedom from torture and from involuntary disappearance. The conventions which envisage a system by which an expert body (treaty body) monitors the implementation by States Parties of their treaty obligations came to be referred to as ‘core’ conventions. The chapter also looks at non-core conventions, as well as declarations and other norms.

Author(s):  
Anna Lawson ◽  
Lisa Waddington

This chapter introduces the book and provides important context for all the subsequent chapters. In particular, it explains the aim of the research presented in the book and situates it within the emerging literature on comparative international (human rights) law, as well as the literature on the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (CRPD). It also sets out the methodology used and explains how the book is structured, with jurisdiction-specific chapters, and chapters providing comparative analysis across jurisdictions illuminating the differences and similarities in the interpretation and use of the CRPD by domestic courts and judges.


REVISTA ESMAT ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 11 (17) ◽  
pp. 209
Author(s):  
Mona Paré

This article examines the impact that the United Nations Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (CRPD) has had on international human rights law. While it seems that the convention may have a narrow focus, as it focuses on a specific group of people, this paper argues that it has had an impact on international human rights law more generally. This impact started with the negotiation of the convention between 2002 and 2006, and is continuing with its implementation since its entry into force in 2008. The impact is of both procedural and substantive nature. On the one hand, the procedure that led to the development and adoption of the CRPD was innovative, as are the mechanisms that have been put into place to monitor its implementation. On the other hand, the convention introduces and develops concepts in a novel way in international law, such as new ways of considering the concept of equality, and to understand development, for example. The article concludes that the international community should capitalize on the new approaches, and that their application and interpretation should be closely monitored.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Willem van Aardt

Abstract Even though COVID-19 has an extremely low crude mortality rate among children, drastic measures to combat the disease significantly infringed the fundamental human rights of millions of children to education and protection. This article examines whether COVID-19-related school closures and the suspension of necessary measures of protection for special needs and vulnerable children were justifiable derogations from covenant obligations and international human rights law. The researcher assessed relevant treaty and covenant obligations of state parties and affirms what international human rights law determines regarding the justifiable limitation of human rights. The article centers on whether the regulations to combat the COVID-19 pandemic are inter alia legitimate, adequate, necessary and proportionate stricto sensu. It argues that the limitation of fundamental human rights must achieve benefits that are proportional to the cost of the limitation, and that the infringement will not be considered proportional if there are less restrictive but equally effective means to achieve the same purpose. Ultimately, it highlights that education and the necessary measures of protection for all children – but specifically those children with special needs and children belonging to vulnerable groups – should be one of the highest priorities in any national strategy to reopen society.


2017 ◽  
pp. 156-164
Author(s):  
Swechhya Sangroula

The paper relies on doctrinal method of study in determining whether a right to water exists under international human rights law. As primary source, the paper relies on the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights and the products of the ICESCR’s monitoring system: Economic and Social Council (ECOSOC) and particularly the work of the CESCR, which is the subsidiary body of the ECOSOC, tasked with monitoring functions, since 1985. The paper relies on the international interpretation of relevant ICESCRprovisions made by the CESCR as ‘evidence of the meaning and application of the Covenant’.1 The paper also relies on the study of relevant Concluding Observations issued by the CESCR during the course of its monitoring of states’ periodic reports. The primary reason, being, that unlike ICCPR’s Human Rights Committee jurisprudence, the ICESCR has not developed a body of jurisprudence from its treaty body. As secondary sources, scholarly writings and published academic debates have been referred to gauge the contents of the academic debate surrounding the issue.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document