Part II Group Identity, Self-Determination, and Relations with States, Ch.7 Equality and Non-Discrimination in the UNDRIP: Articles 2, 6, and 7(1)

Human Rights Law ◽

Full Spectrum ◽

International Human ◽

United Nations Declaration

This chapter analyses the rights to equality and non-discrimination in Articles 2, 6, and 7(1). The United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples (UNDRIP) covers the full spectrum of rights contained in international and regional instruments, adapted to the circumstances of indigenous peoples. Because the UNDRIP has an exceptionally wide substantive scope, debates about equality and non-discrimination were a central part of the negotiations leading to its adoption. Where provisions of the UNDRIP were thought to deviate from rights already expressed in international law, they were perceived in some states to compromise the fundamental principles of equality and non-discrimination that underpin existing human rights' instruments. In this way, the extensive discussions about equality and indigeneity that characterized the development of UNDRIP are also debates about the continuity and coherency of international human rights' law.

Defining ‘People’ and ‘Indigenous People’ in International Human Rights Law and Its Application in Indonesia

International Journal on Minority and Group Rights ◽

10.1163/15718115-02602006 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 26 (3) ◽

pp. 373-408

Author(s):

M. Ya’kub Aiyub Kadir

Keyword(s):

Human Rights ◽

Natural Resources ◽

International Law ◽

Indigenous People ◽

Indigenous Peoples ◽

Human Rights Law ◽

International Human ◽

The Third World

This article investigates the problem of defining ‘people’ and ‘indigenous people’ under the International Human Rights Covenants and their application in the Indonesian context. Using analyses based on the Third World Approach to International Law (twail), this article shows the problems facing Indonesia in identifying indigenous peoples as traditional peoples, in terms of being isolated peoples (Masyarakat Hukum Adat, hereafter mha), and the non-isolated indigenous peoples who were sovereign before the independence of Indonesia. This interpretation has been confusing in relation to the entitlement to natural resources. Therefore, this article proposes a new understanding of indigenous peoples, in order to arrive at better treatment and recognition and in terms of sharing power and the benefits of natural resources in the Indonesian system.

The Right of Self-Determination: Its Emergence, Development, and Controversy

Jurnal Konstitusi ◽

10.31078/jk1211 ◽

2016 ◽

Vol 12 (1) ◽

pp. 1

Author(s):

Munafrizal Manan

Keyword(s):

Human Rights ◽

International Law ◽

Self Determination ◽

Human Rights Law ◽

Human Right ◽

International Human ◽

The Right ◽

Right Of Self Determination

This paper discusses the right of self-determinationfrom international law and international human rights law perspective. It traces the emergence and development of self-determination from political principle to human right. It also explores the controversy of the right of self-determination. There have been different and even contradictory interpretations of the right of self-determination. Besides, there is no consensus on the mechanism to apply the right of self-determination. Both international law and international human rights law are vague about this.

The Protection of Minorities and Indigenous Peoples in International Law: A Comparative Temporal Analysis

International Journal on Minority and Group Rights ◽

10.1163/157181110x512142 ◽

2010 ◽

Vol 17 (3) ◽

pp. 393-422

Author(s):

Joshua Castellino

Keyword(s):

Human Rights ◽

International Law ◽

Indigenous Peoples ◽

Minority Rights ◽

Temporal Analysis ◽

Human Rights Law ◽

Human Rights Regime ◽

AbstractIt is easy to detect a sense of achievement with the extent to which the human rights regime has progressed 60 years after the Universal Declaration of Human Rights. The relative international successes suggest a bright outlook for the future of the human rights regime. However, an important lacuna remains in the attention that ought to be paid to minorities, indigenous peoples and others in vulnerable situations, including in some instances, women. This paper argues that despite the creation of sophisticated systems of international human rights law, the regimes for the protection of minority rights were stronger before the United Nations (UN) era. In support of this argument it seeks to assess regimes that existed at three different times, attempting to extrapolate and analyse the snapshots presented by these through the lens of evolving human rights law.

Assessing the Consistency of Kurdish Democratic Autonomy with International Human Rights Law

Nordic Journal of International Law ◽

10.1163/15718107-bja10013 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 89 (2) ◽

pp. 168-208

Author(s):

Gaetano Pentassuglia

Keyword(s):

Human Rights ◽

International Law ◽

Present Article ◽

Self Determination ◽

Human Rights Law ◽

International Human ◽

Internal Coherence ◽

Kurdish Question

Large sectors of the Kurdish movement in Turkey have progressively come to discuss, develop and/or endorse models of so-called “democratic autonomy”. While there are several works in the field detailing and critiquing Turkey’s policies vis-à-vis the Kurds, the international legal dimension of the Kurdish democratic autonomy proposal in its own right has received far less attention to date. The present article seeks to fill this gap by reflecting upon the internal coherence and consistency of the democratic autonomy argument in light of international law standards and practice, with particular reference to internal self-determination in Turkey. I argue that any future settlement of the Kurdish question will require not only Turkey’s compliance with its own human rights obligations, but also the Kurdish movement’s ability to negotiate the accommodation of its aspirations in ways that are consistent with international human rights law.

The Role of Domestic Courts in International Human Rights Law: The Constitutional Court of Colombia and Free, Prior and Informed Consent

International Journal on Minority and Group Rights ◽

10.1163/15718115-02303001 ◽

2016 ◽

Vol 23 (3) ◽

pp. 355-381

Author(s):

José Parra

Keyword(s):

Human Rights ◽

International Law ◽

Indigenous Peoples ◽

Soft Law ◽

Constitutional Court ◽

Human Rights Law ◽

Domestic Courts ◽

The internalization of international law by domestic courts is central to the effective implementation of international human rights law. This is particularly true for emerging rights rooted in soft law. In this regard, indigenous peoples’ rights have significantly expanded in international law over the past 20 years, essentially in the form of soft law. As a case study, the review of the jurisprudence of the Constitutional Court of Colombia illustrates ‘progressive’ interpretation of soft law, notably on free, prior and informed consent, which is enshrined in the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples. Thus, domestic courts not only implement international human rights law, but they also foster its development.

The Legal Status of the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples (2007) in Contemporary International Human Rights Law

International Human Rights Law Review ◽

10.1163/22131035-00602006 ◽

2017 ◽

Vol 6 (2) ◽

pp. 242-261 ◽

Cited By ~ 1

Author(s):

Sylvanus Gbendazhi Barnabas

Keyword(s):

Human Rights ◽

United Nations ◽

International Law ◽

Indigenous Peoples ◽

Legal Status ◽

Customary International Law ◽

International Human ◽

United Nations Declaration

This article explores the legal status or effect of the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples (undrip) in contemporary international human rights law. As a United Nations General Assembly (unga) resolution, the legal significance of undrip may appear uncertain on the surface. However, several unga resolutions do carry some legal weight with far-reaching legal implications in international law. For example, the Universal Declaration of Human Rights 1948 (udhr) has been widely accepted, at least in part, as forming part of customary international law. Through a critical examination of relevant literature and some decisions of international, regional and national courts, this article examines whether the undrip, in whole or in part, reflects customary international law. It also considers the relationship of the undrip with other international human rights instruments, and whether it should be applied as part of general principles of law on issues that are essential to indigenous peoples such as non-discrimination, self-identification, land rights and development.

The Review of Articles from Korea International Law Review (Vol. 1-49): International Human Rights Law

Korea International Law Review ◽

10.25197/kilr.2018.51.45 ◽

2018 ◽

Vol 51 ◽

pp. 45-62

Author(s):

Buhm Suk Baek

Keyword(s):

Human Rights ◽

International Law ◽

Human Rights Law ◽

The Idea of International Human Rights Law

10.1093/oso/9780198749844.001.0001 ◽

2019 ◽

Author(s):

Steven Wheatley

Keyword(s):

Human Rights ◽

International Law ◽

Human Rights Law ◽

Fragmentation Of International Law

Moral Concept ◽

Customary International Law ◽

Human Rights Treaties ◽

International Human ◽

International Human Rights Law has emerged as an academic subject in its own right, separate from, but still related to, International Law. This book explains the distinctive nature of the new discipline by examining the influence of the moral concept of human rights on general international law. Rather than make use of moral philosophy or political theory, the work explains the term ‘human rights’ by examining its usage in international law practice, on the understanding that words are given meaning through their use. Relying on complexity theory to make sense of the legal practice in the United Nations, the core human rights treaties, and customary international law, The Idea of International Human Rights Law shows how a moral concept of human rights emerged, and then influenced the international law doctrine and practice on human rights, a fact that explains the fragmentation of international law and the special nature of International Human Rights Law.

Governmental human rights focal points in federal contexts: The implementation of the Istanbul convention in Switzerland as a case study

Netherlands Quarterly of Human Rights ◽

10.1177/09240519211016947 ◽

2021 ◽

pp. 092405192110169

Author(s):

Matthieu Niederhauser

Keyword(s):

Domestic Violence ◽

Human Rights ◽

International Law ◽

Focal Points ◽

Human Rights Law ◽

Federal States ◽

The implementation of international human rights law in federal States is an underexplored process. Subnational entities regularly enjoy a degree of sovereignty, which raises questions such as whether they implement obligations of international law and how the federal level may ensure that implementation takes place at the subnational level. This article aims to answer these questions, using the implementation of the Convention on Preventing and Combating Violence against Women and Domestic Violence (Convention) in Switzerland as a case study. To implement the Convention at the cantonal level, federal actors decided to use networks of civil servants in charge of domestic violence issues, who act as governmental human rights focal points (GHRFPs). This article is based on original empirical data, on 25 interviews with State officials who participate in this implementation. The findings show how complex GHRFPs networks work in practice to implement the Convention and highlight the role played by numerous non-legal State actors in this process. As a result, the article argues that international human rights law implementation becomes more diversified both within and across federal States.

The radical ideation of peasants, the ‘pseudo-radicalism’ of international human rights law, and the revolutionary lawyer

London Review of International Law ◽

10.1093/lril/lraa024 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 8 (3) ◽

pp. 425-456

Author(s):

Margot E Salomon

Keyword(s):

Human Rights ◽

Rural Areas ◽

Social Transformation ◽

Unintended Consequences ◽

Human Rights Law ◽

International Human ◽

Theory Of Law ◽

United Nations Declaration

Abstract This article questions the use of international human rights law in realising social transformation. It studies the new United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Peasants and Other People Working in Rural Areas, drawing on the commodity-form theory of law. Through this lens, foregrounding the relationship between capitalism and law and their shared constituent form, the contradiction in what is at times a radical normative project in international human rights law is revealed. With the unintended consequences of human rights lawyering made visible, this work turns to the means through which the advocate can launch a potentially transformative ‘legal’ strategy. An exploration of two seminal modes of reconciliation follows: reconciling the use of international human rights law with a commitment to social transformation and reconciling the post-capitalist politics of progressive lawyers with their use of the law.