Pediatric Airway and Mediastinum Radiology

Author(s):  
Joshua H. Finkle

Chapter 10 examines radiologic images for common and uncommon pediatric airway and mediastinal disorders. These include pediatric airway disorders such as epiglottitis, croup, exudative tracheitis, congenital tracheomalacia, obstructive sleep apnea, retropharyngeal abscess, esophageal atresia, and tracheoesophageal fistula. The chapter goes on to look at vascular impressions on the trachea and esophagus, including double aortic arch, aberrant right subclavian artery, right aortic arch with aberrant left subclavian artery, pulmonary sling, esophageal and tracheal foreign bodies, and bronchial foreign body. Mediastinal abnormalities examined include normal thymus and mediastinal masses. The chapter covers the clinical features and anatomy associated with these disorders as well as their diagnosis based on the radiologic imaging.

2015 ◽  
Vol 3 (4) ◽  
pp. 162-164
Author(s):  
Mubarak Mohd Yusof ◽  
Sharini Shamsudin

Two cases of aberrant subclavian arteries were detected incidentally during computed tomography scan of the thorax for other medical conditions. The patients did not have weight loss or dysphagia lusoria. The origin and course of theaberrant subclavian arteries are related to the anomaly of the aortic arch. The variations of aberrant right subclavian artery with left aortic arch and aberrant left subclavian artery with right aortic arch on computed tomography are discussed.Journal of Kathmandu Medical CollegeVol. 3, No. 4, Oct.-Dec., 2014Page: 162-164


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Betül Çınar ◽  
Sezen Ugan Atik ◽  
Aysel Türkvatan Cansever ◽  
Sertaç Haydın ◽  
Alper Güzeltaş

Although rare, vascular sling-ring complexes together in the same patient may be encountered. Once clinical complaints compatible with vascular ring anomalies are described, it should be kept in mind that more than one anomaly may be associated. By this case, the diagnostic and therapeutic course of pulmonary sling (PS) and aberrant right subclavian artery (ARSA) in an infant with breathing and feeding difficulties was presented.


2014 ◽  
Vol 2014 ◽  
pp. 1-6 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pasaoglu Lale ◽  
Ugur Toprak ◽  
Gökhan Yagız ◽  
Tunca Kaya ◽  
Sadık Ahmet Uyanık

Objectives. The aim was to determine the prevalence of aortic arch variations in 881 patients who underwent neck CT angiography for various reasons. Material and Methods. 881 patients were included in the study who had undergone neck CT angiography between 2010 and 2013. Results. Of 881 patients, 770 (87.4%) patients with classic branching pattern of the aortic arch (AA) were observed. Variations in branching pattern were seen in 111 (12.6%) patients. The most common variation was the origination of the left common carotid artery (LCCA) from the brachiocephalic trunk (BCT). This pattern was observed in 64 (7.2%) cases. In 25 (2.8%) cases, the left vertebral artery (LVA) originated directly from the AA between the origin of the LCCA and left subclavian artery (SCA). 17 (1.9%) cases had aberrant right subclavian artery. Three (0.3%) cases showed right aortic arch. Two cases had right aortic arch with aberrant left subclavian artery. Conclusions. Variations in the branching pattern of the AA are not rare. Head and neck surgeons and interventional radiologists should be aware of aortic arch variations. CTA is a reliable imaging method for demonstrating anatomical features and variations of the AA.


2021 ◽  
Vol 17 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Christiane Schorn ◽  
Nicolai Hildebrandt ◽  
Matthias Schneider ◽  
Sebastian Schaub

Abstract Background Congenital anomalies of the aortic arch are important as they may be associated with vascular ring anomalies. The most common vascular ring anomaly in dogs is a persistent right aortic arch. However, published data of the distribution of the different types of vascular ring anomalies and other aortic arch anomalies are lacking. The objective of this retrospective descriptive study was to evaluate both the prevalence and the different types of aortic arch anomalies that can be detected using thoracic computed tomography (CT) examination. Archived thoracic CT examinations acquired between 2008 and 2020 at a single institution were retrospectively evaluated by 2 evaluators for the prevalence and type of aortic arch anomaly. Breed, age, and presenting complaint were obtained from the medical record system. Results A total of 213 CT studies were evaluated; 21 dogs (21/213, 9.9%) showed a right aortic arch and a left ligamentum arteriosum with compression of the esophagus. The following incidental additional findings were detected: aberrant left subclavian artery (17/21, 76.2%), branching from the persistent ductus arteriosus (PDA) (1/21, 4.8%), left-sided brachiocephalic trunk (3/21, 14.3%), bicarotid trunk (17/21, 81.0%), double aortic arch (1/21, 4.8%). One hundred ninety two dogs (192/213, 90.1%) showed a left aortic arch without esophageal compression. The following additional abnormalities were obtained in those dogs with left aortic arch: aberrant right subclavian artery (3/192, 1.6%) without clinical signs of esophageal compression, aberrant vessel branching from the aorta into the left caudal lung lobe (2/192, 1.0%), focal dilatation of the left or right subclavian artery (2/192, 1.0%), bicarotid trunk (1/192, 0.5%). Conclusion Similar to previous studies an aberrant left subclavian artery is the most common additional finding in dogs with persistent right aortic arch. Newly, a left-sided brachiocephalic trunk was identified in 14.3% of the dogs with a persistent right aortic arch; no additional compression was caused by the left sided brachiocephalic trunk. Similarly, aberrant right subclavian artery can be an incidental CT finding without causing compression of the esophagus.


2021 ◽  
Vol 19 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Xinjian He ◽  
Jiaoyang Chen ◽  
Gaoyang Li

Abstract Background The purpose of this study was to explore echocardiographic views and methods of aortic arch anomalies in infants, so as to improve the screening sensitivity and diagnostic accuracy. Methods 140 children with abnormal aortic arch diagnosed by ultrasound in Children’s Hospital of Hebei Province from January 2014 to December 2019 were selected for retrospective analysis. All were confirmed by surgery or/and computerized tomography angiography. Series of views for aortic arch (the three-vessel and tracheal view, aortic arch short axis view, left aortic arch long axis view, aortic arch long axis continuous scan views) were performed in all cases on the basis of the routine views of echocardiography. The screening sensitivity and diagnostic coincidence rate of different echocardiographic views for aortic arch anomalies were analyzed. Results Among the 140 infants, right aortic arch were 21 cases (6/21 were accompanied by mirror branch and 15/21 were with aberrant left subclavian artery). Left aortic arch with aberrant right subclavian artery were 2 cases, and double aortic arch with both arches open were 20 cases. Double aortic arch with left arch atresia were 2 cases, and atresia of the proximal aorta with aortic arch dysplasia was 1 case. Coarctation of the aorta were 67 cases, and interruption of aortic arch were 27 cases. All the patients were correctly diagnosed except that 2 infants with interruption of aortic arch were incorrectly diagnosed as coarctation of the aorta, and 1 infant with coarctation of the aorta was misdiagnosed as interruption of aortic arch by echocardiography. The screening sensitivities of four views and four-view combination for abnormal aortic arch were 99.3, 73.6, 87.1, 99.3, and 100%; the diagnostic coincidence rates were 85.7, 27.1,66.4, 95.0%, and 97.9% respectively. On the basis of traditional left aortic long axis view, other three views had their own advantages. The screening sensitivity and diagnostic coincidence rate of four-view combination were significantly improved. Conclusions The three-vessel trachea view is simple and feasible, which is suitable for screening abnormal aortic arch. The combination of four views conduces to improving screening sensitivity and diagnostic accuracy of aortic arch abnormalities.


2007 ◽  
Vol 80 (959) ◽  
pp. e260-e264 ◽  
Author(s):  
M Haliloglu ◽  
M Karcaaltincaba ◽  
B Oguz ◽  
A Celiker

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document