Prevention of Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting

This case focuses on the prevention of postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) by asking the question: What is the efficacy of six well-established prophylactic antiemetic strategies individually and in combination for the prevention of postoperative nausea and vomiting? Each of the three antiemetics in this study (ondansetron, dexamethasone, and droperidol) reduced the risk for PONV by approximately 26%; substituting propofol for volatile anesthetic reduced the risk by 19%; and substituting nitrogen (air) for nitrous oxide reduced the risk by 12%. A maximum reduction of 70% in the relative risk for PONV can be expected when total intravenous anesthesia is used with three antiemetics. The appropriate approach to the management of PONV depends on the patient’s baseline risk factors as well as the likelihood of adverse events and costs from the antiemetic medications.

2010 ◽  
Vol 20 (6) ◽  
pp. 215-218
Author(s):  
Luke Ewart

This article evaluates whether avoidance of nitrous oxide in general anaesthesia can improve clinical outcomes in surgical patients by reducing postoperative nausea and vomiting, and whether avoidance should become part of a routine clinical management strategy. Despite some controversy, the greatest strength of evidence suggests that avoidance of nitrous oxide may be justified as a pre-emptive perioperative strategy as part of a multimodal approach to postoperative nausea and vomiting, especially in those patients known to have a higher baseline risk.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Helene Beloeil ◽  
Matthias Garot ◽  
Gilles Lebuffe ◽  
Alexandre Gerbaud ◽  
Julien Bila ◽  
...  

Background It is speculated that opioid-free anesthesia may provide adequate pain control while reducing postoperative opioid consumption. However, there is currently no evidence to support the speculation. The authors hypothesized that opioid-free balanced anesthetic with dexmedetomidine reduces postoperative opioid-related adverse events compared with balanced anesthetic with remifentanil. Methods Patients were randomized to receive a standard balanced anesthetic with either intraoperative remifentanil plus morphine (remifentanil group) or dexmedetomidine (opioid-free group). All patients received intraoperative propofol, desflurane, dexamethasone, lidocaine infusion, ketamine infusion, neuromuscular blockade, and postoperative lidocaine infusion, paracetamol, nefopam, and patient-controlled morphine. The primary outcome was a composite of postoperative opioid-related adverse events (hypoxemia, ileus, or cognitive dysfunction) within the first 48 h after extubation. The main secondary outcomes were episodes of postoperative pain, opioid consumption, and postoperative nausea and vomiting. Results The study was stopped prematurely because of five cases of severe bradycardia in the dexmedetomidine group. The primary composite outcome occurred in 122 of 156 (78%) dexmedetomidine group patients compared with 105 of 156 (67%) in the remifentanil group (relative risk, 1.16; 95% CI, 1.01 to 1.33; P = 0.031). Hypoxemia occurred 110 of 152 (72%) of dexmedetomidine group and 94 of 155 (61%) of remifentanil group patients (relative risk, 1.19; 95% CI, 1.02 to 1.40; P = 0.030). There were no differences in ileus or cognitive dysfunction. Cumulative 0 to 48 h postoperative morphine consumption (11 mg [5 to 21] versus 6 mg [0 to 17]) and postoperative nausea and vomiting (58 of 157 [37%] versus 37 of 157 [24%]; relative risk, 0.64; 95% CI, 0.45 to 0.90) were both less in the dexmedetomidine group, whereas measures of analgesia were similar in both groups. Dexmedetomidine patients had more delayed extubation and prolonged postanesthesia care unit stay. Conclusions This trial refuted the hypothesis that balanced opioid-free anesthesia with dexmedetomidine, compared with remifentanil, would result in fewer postoperative opioid-related adverse events. Conversely, it did result in a greater incidence of serious adverse events, especially hypoxemia and bradycardia. Editor’s Perspective What We Already Know about This Topic What This Article Tells Us That Is New


2015 ◽  
Vol 2015 ◽  
pp. 1-7 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xin Yu Adeline Leong ◽  
Xian Wen Charlene Kwa ◽  
Shu Hui Elizabeth Ng ◽  
Liang Khai Darren Koh

Introduction. We explored how ethnicity affects the risk of postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) and established the correlation of suggested risk factors of PONV in the multiethnic population of Singapore. Methods. 785 patients who underwent orthopaedic surgery were recruited. These comprised 619 Chinese (78.9%), 76 Malay (9.7%), 68 Indian (8.7%), and 22 other (2.8%) cases. The presence of possible risk factors of PONV and nausea and/or vomiting within 24 h after surgery was studied. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed. Results. The incidence of PONV was 33.2% (261 patients). There was no statistically significant difference of PONV incidence between Chinese, Malay, and Indian cases (34.6% versus 34.2% versus 29.4%, p=0.695). Indian females younger than 50 years were found to have a higher incidence of vomiting (p=0.02). The significant risk factors for this population include females, use of nitrous oxide, and a history of PONV. Conclusion. In the groups studied, ethnicity is not a significant risk factor for PONV except for young Indian females who have a higher risk of postoperative vomiting. We suggest the selective usage of antiemetic for young Indian females as prophylaxis and avoiding nitrous oxide use in high-risk patients.


2011 ◽  
Vol 2011 ◽  
pp. 1-10 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. Chatterjee ◽  
A. Rudra ◽  
S. Sengupta

Postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) are still common following surgery. This is not only distressing to the patient, but increases costs. The thorough understanding of the mechanism of nausea and vomiting and a careful assessment of risk factors provide a rationale for appropriate management of PONV. Strategy to reduce baseline risk and the adoption of a multimodal approach will most likely ensure success in the management of PONV.


2010 ◽  
Vol 27 ◽  
pp. 28-29
Author(s):  
R. Poeira ◽  
I. Antunes ◽  
H. Filipe ◽  
A. Fernandes ◽  
F. Matos

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document