Efficacy and Safety of Electroconvulsive Therapy in Depressive Disorders

Author(s):  
Joseph J. Taylor ◽  
Robert Ostroff

This chapter will summarize an important systematic review and meta-analysis. The authors of this study analyzed decades of evidence from thousands of patients in order to address fundamental questions about the safety and efficacy of electroconvulsive therapy for depressive symptoms. The data from this manuscript continue to inform clinical practice in regards to this stigmatized yet potentially life-saving treatment. The chapter will discuss the setup and implementation of the systematic review and meta-analysis before focusing on the results and their implications. The last section of the chapter will identify relevant studies and present a hypothetical clinical case that requires the reader to apply basic concepts learned from the systematic review and meta-analysis.

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Linjie Peng ◽  
Junjun Wen ◽  
Wen Zhong ◽  
Guohua Zeng

Abstract Objective: Physical therapy, including percussion, inversion, vibration and combinations, was clinically performed to improve the stone free rate (SFR) following lithotripsy procedures. However, physical therapy is not widely accepted in clinical practice owing to lack of high level evidence support and a standard protocol. The present meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of physical therapy in improving SFR following extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy (ESWL) and retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS).Methods: Systematic review of literature from PubMed, Scopus, Cochrane library and Embase was performed in March 2019. The efficacy and safety of physical therapy after ESWL and RIRS were assessed by meta-analysis of SFR and complication rate.Results: A total of 8 prospective studies with 1065 patients were enrolled. When compared to non-intervention, physical therapy provided a higher SFR (OR:3.38, 95% CI: 2.45-4.66, p< 0.0001) at all time points (week 1, week 2 and month 1), while there was no significant difference in complications such as hematuria, lumbago, dizziness and urinary tract infection(OR: 0.84; 95%CI: 0.62-1.13; p=0.237). In subgroup analysis of different stone locations, lower calyx stone (OR: 3.51; 95%CI: 2.21-5.55; p<0.0001), upper ureter and renal pelvic stones (OR:2.79; 95%CI:1.62-4.81; p=0.0002) had a higher SFR after physical therapy, while there was no significant improvement in SFR in upper and middle calyx stones. In subgroup analysis of different techniques, EPVL (external physical vibration lithecbole, OR:3.47; 95%CI:2.24-5.37; p<0.0001) and PDI (percussion, diuresis and inversion, OR:3.24; 95%CI:2.01-5.21; p<0.0001) were both effective in improving SFR when compared to non-intervention. Conclusions: Physical therapy is effective in improving the SFR after ESWL and RIRS, especially for lower calyx stones, upper ureter and renal pelvic stones, while without significant side effects. External physical vibration lithecbole (EPVL) might provide a relative uniformed and repeatable protocol for clinical practice of physical therapy. Review Registration: PROSPERO 2019 CRD42019130228.


2022 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zheng Wang ◽  
◽  
Hai-Hong Zhu ◽  
Jin-Yu Yang ◽  
Yan Wang ◽  
...  

Review question / Objective: With the popularity of laparoscopy and minimally invasive technology, laparoscopy has been applied to hepatic echinococcosis. However, the safety and efficacy of traditional laparotomy and laparoscopy are unclear. This study aimed to explore the advantages and disadvantages of laparoscopy and traditional laparotomy with a Meta-analysis.To compare the efficacy and safety of laparoscopic with that of traditional laparotomy. Condition being studied: There still exist controversies about the advantages and disadvantages of laparoscopic and traditional open surgery.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document