Multisite artery disease

ESC CardioMed ◽  
2018 ◽  
pp. 2733-2739
Author(s):  
Marco De Carlo

Multisite artery disease (MSAD) is common in patients with atherosclerotic involvement in one vascular bed, ranging from 10-15% in patients with CAD to 60-70% in patients with severe carotid stenosis or LEAD. MSAD is invariably associated with worse clinical outcomes; however, screening for asymptomatic disease in additional vascular sites has not been proven to improve prognosis. In patients with any presentation of PADs, clinical assessment of symptoms and physical signs of other localizations and/or CAD is necessary, and in case of clinical suspicion, further tests may be planned. Systematic screening for asymptomatic MSAD is not indicated for any presentation of PADs as it would not consistently lead to a modification of management strategy. It may be interesting in some cases for risk stratification (e.g. antiplatelet therapy strategy beyond one year in patients who benefited from coronary stenting for ACS). In some situations the identification of asymptomatic lesions may affect patient management. This is the case for patients undergoing CABG, where ABI measurement may be considered especially when saphenous vein harvesting is planned, and carotid screening should be considered in a subset of patients at high risk of carotid artery disease. In patients scheduled for CABG with severe carotid stenoses, prophylactic carotid revascularization should be considered in recently symptomatic cases and may be considered in asymptomatic cases, after multidisciplinary discussion. In patients planned for carotid artery revascularization for asymptomatic stenosis, a preoperative coronary angiography for detection (and revascularization) of CAD may be considered.

2012 ◽  
Vol 116 (6) ◽  
pp. 1251-1257 ◽  
Author(s):  
Travis M. Dumont ◽  
Anand I. Rughani

Object Several randomized trials have emerged with conflicting data on the overall safety of carotid artery stenting (CAS) in comparison with carotid endarterectomy (CEA). The authors hypothesize that changes in national trends correspond to publication of randomized trials, including an increase in utilization of CAS after publication of trials favorable to CAS (for example, Carotid and Vertebral Artery Transluminal Angioplasty Study [CAVATAS] and Stenting and Angioplasty with Protection in Patients at High Risk for Endarterectomy [SAPPHIRE]) and decrease in utilization of CAS after publication of trials favorable to CEA (for example, Endarterectomy versus Stenting in Patients with Symptomatic Severe Carotid Stenosis [EVA3-S] and Stent-Supported Percutaneous Angioplasty of the Carotid Artery versus Endarterectomy [SPACE]). Methods The Nationwide Inpatient Sample was obtained for the years 1998–2008. Individual cases were isolated for principal diagnosis of unilateral or bilateral carotid artery stenosis or occlusion undergoing CEA or CAS. The percentage of CAS for all carotid revascularization procedures was calculated for each year. Perioperative inpatient morbidity, including stroke or death, were calculated and compared. Results The percentage of patients undergoing CAS increased yearly from the start of the observed period to the end, with the exception of a decrease in 2007. The peak utilization of CAS for carotid artery revascularization procedures was 15% of all cases in 2006. The stroke or death rate was consistent at 5% among all patients undergoing CEA for all years, while the incidence of stroke or death decreased among patients undergoing CAS from 9% in 1998 to 5% in 2008. Conclusions The practice of CAS in the US is expanding, from less than 3% of all carotid artery revascularization procedures to 13% in 2008. The utilization of CAS was seen to correlate with publication of randomized trials. Utilization nearly doubled in 2005 after publication of the CAS-favorable SAPPHIRE in 2004, and decreased by 22% after publication of the CEA-favorable EVA-3S and SPACE in 2007. With the publication of Carotid Revascularization Endarterectomy Versus Stenting Trial (CREST), the authors predict a resultant increase in the rate of CAS for carotid artery disease in the upcoming years.


2017 ◽  
Vol 63 (11) ◽  
pp. 1012-1016
Author(s):  
Patrícia Feitosa Frota dos Reis ◽  
Pedro Vieira Linhares ◽  
Fábio Grunspun Pitta ◽  
Eduardo Gomes Lima

Summary The concomitance between coronary artery disease and carotid artery disease is known and well documented. However, it is a fact that, despite the screening methods for these conditions and the advances in surgical treatment, little has been achieved in terms of reducing the risk of complications in the perioperative period. Publications are scarce, being mostly composed of reports or case series. There is little agreement on the best initial therapeutic approach (myocardial versus carotid revascularization) or the best technique to be used (surgery with or without extracorporeal circulation, hybrid treatments, etc.). The authors performed a review of the evidence in this clinical scenario, raising pragmatic questions that help in the therapeutic decision.


Pharmacology ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 85 (2) ◽  
pp. 63-67 ◽  
Author(s):  
Graziano Riccioni ◽  
Nicola Vitulano ◽  
Barbara Mancini ◽  
Alessandra Zanasi ◽  
Nicolantonio D’Orazio

2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
pp. 46-46
Author(s):  
Samad Ghaffari ◽  
Elyar Sadeghi Hokmabadi ◽  
Reza Rikhtegar ◽  
Farhad Niafar ◽  
Reza Zolfaghari ◽  
...  

Background: Carotid artery stenosis is one of the main causes of ischemic stroke in Iranian population. Carotid artery stenting (CAS) is a method with for treating carotid artery disease, in order to prevent stroke. Dispersion of the embolus is a significant risk for carotid angioplasty which can be prevented by using protective devices. But studies have shown that the use of these protective devices is not safe and can have side effects such as vascular spasm and dissection. Method: 36 patients who underwent unprotected carotid artery angioplasty from April 2018 to August 2019 in Shahid Madani hospital retrospectively entered this study. Hospital records were studied for data collection. Patients were followed by phone interviews. Major adverse cardiovascular and cerebral events (MACCE) was defined as a composite of the occurrence of stroke, MI, bleeding, and all-cause mortality in the long term. Mean duration of our follow-up was 6 months. Results: During in-hospital course, an 82 years old woman with a history of CVA, hypertension, diabetes and a significant stenosis in her contralateral ICA, had an episode of stroke which was fatal. Also, there was a 46 years old woman without any risk factors, who had developed intracranial hemorrhage (ICH). 22 patients were followed. No MI, stroke, or death occurred in any of the patients. There were only 2 cases of bleeding. Conclusion: Carotid artery stenting without protection may be is a safe method of carotid revascularization. Further prospective studies and clinical trials are needed.


2004 ◽  
Vol 35 (03) ◽  
Author(s):  
C Terborg ◽  
G Heide ◽  
H Axer ◽  
F Joachimski ◽  
S Köhler ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 2 (6) ◽  
Author(s):  
Leonardo R ◽  
Elmiro SR ◽  
Angelica LDD ◽  
Nilson PS ◽  
João Lucas OC ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document