Letter to the Editor: Comments on “There Is No Role for Damage Control Orthopedics Within the Golden Hour”

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tom k Rowlands ◽  
Jonathan m Kendrew ◽  
Douglas m BOWLEY ◽  
Sarah a Stapley ◽  
Rory Rickard
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael D Eckhoff ◽  
Justin D Orr ◽  
Matthew E Wells ◽  
Leon J Nesti ◽  
John C Dunn

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
John C Dunn ◽  
Eric A Elster ◽  
James A Blair ◽  
Kyle N Remick ◽  
Benjamin K Potter ◽  
...  

ABSTRACT Introduction Trauma systems within the United States have adapted the “golden hour” principle to guide prehospital planning with the goal to deliver the injured to the trauma facility in under 60 minutes. In an effort to reduce preventable prehospital death, in 2009, Secretary of Defense Robert M. Gates mandated that prehospital transport of injured combat casualties must be less than 60 minutes. The U.S. Military has implemented a 60-minute timeline for the transport of battlefield causalities to medical teams to include Forward Surgical Teams and Forward Resuscitative Surgical Teams. The inclusion of orthopedic surgeons on Forward Surgical Teams has been extrapolated from the concept of damage control orthopedics (DCO). However, it is not clear if orthopedic surgeons have yielded a demonstrable benefit in morbidity or mortality reduction. The purpose of this article is to investigate the function of orthopedic surgeons during the military “golden hour.” Materials and Methods The English literature was reviewed for evidence supporting the use of orthopedic surgeons within the golden hour. Literature was reviewed in light of the 2009 golden hour mandate by Secretary Gates as well as those papers which highlighted the utility of DCO within the golden hour. Results Evidence for orthopedic surgery within the “golden hour” or in the current conflicts when the United States enjoys air superiority was not identified. Conclusions Within the military context, DCO, specifically pertaining to fracture fixation, should not be considered an element of golden hour planning and thus orthopedic surgeons are best utilized at more centralized Role 3 facility locations. The focus within the first hour after injury on the battlefield should be maintained on rapid and effective prehospital care combined with timely evacuation, as these are the most critical factors to reducing mortality.


2019 ◽  
Vol 43 (5) ◽  
pp. 1393-1394
Author(s):  
Edoardo Mattone ◽  
Elena Schembari ◽  
Maurizio Mannino ◽  
Sarita Magazù ◽  
Isidoro Di Carlo

2016 ◽  
pp. 205-215
Author(s):  
Philipp Mommsen ◽  
Christian Macke ◽  
Christian Krettek

Author(s):  
Madhusudhan Yakkanti ◽  
Cyril Mauffrey ◽  
Craig S. Roberts

2021 ◽  
Vol 86 (3) ◽  
pp. 80-82
Author(s):  
Michał Kułakowski ◽  
◽  
Paweł Reichert ◽  
Karol Elster ◽  
Wojciech Piotrowski

Introduction. The most challenging injury in orthopedic surgery is pelvic trauma. There are different concepts of treatment strategies, specially in final treatment of pelvic ring and acetabular fractures. Objectives. Analysis of recent studies and evaluation of treatment methods. Materials and Methods. Analysis of 22 recent studies. Five papers met our inclusion criteria, that equated 745 patients. Results. Patients hemodynamically unstable need to be resuscitated and „damage control” orthopedics is widely accepted method. Definitive treatment after fourth day should be performed. Some papers show that early, within 48 hours, definitive treatment of pelvic ring and acetabular fractures give similar or better results. Conclusions. Tendency to early definitive treatment is widely observed and decreases mortality rates and complications.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document