scholarly journals RONC-16. RISK OF PREMATURE RADIONECROSIS IN PAEDIATRIC PATIENTS WITH HIGH RISK MEDULLOBLASTOMA TREATED WITH PROTONS ON THE CRANIUM SPINAL AXIS

2018 ◽  
Vol 20 (suppl_2) ◽  
pp. i177-i178
Author(s):  
Giovanna Stefania Colafati ◽  
Chiara Carducci ◽  
Barbara Rombi ◽  
Stefano Lorentini ◽  
Andrea Carai ◽  
...  
2021 ◽  
Vol 108 (Supplement_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
H Subbiah Ponniah ◽  
M Ahmed ◽  
T Edwards ◽  
J Cobb ◽  
E Dean ◽  
...  

Abstract Introduction There are now over 2.5 million NHS patients awaiting elective surgery, with the most in orthopaedics. We present an algorithm and results for safely and equitably restarting surgery at COVID-light sites. Method An MDT applied the COVID-19 Algorithm for Resuming Elective Surgery (CARES) on 1169 patients awaiting elective orthopaedic surgery. It assessed safety, procedural efficacy, and biopsychosocial factors, to prioritise patients. They were assigned to five categories and underwent surgery at one of three COVID-light sites (1. access to HDU/ITU/Paediatrics/specialist equipment, 2. an NHS elective surgical unit and 3. a private elective surgical unit). Results 21 ‘Urgent’ patients received expedited care; 118 were Level 1/2; 222 were Level 3; 808 were Level 4. In 6 weeks, 355 surgeries were performed, with Urgent and Level 1/2 cases performed soonest (mean 18 days, p < 0.001). 33 high-risk/complex/paediatric patients had surgery at Site 1 and the rest at Sites 2 and 3. No patients contracted COVID-19 within 2 weeks of surgery. Conclusions We validated a widely generalisable model to facilitate resumption of elective surgery in COVID-light sites. It enabled surgery for patients in most suffering, undergoing the most efficacious procedures and/or at highest risk of deterioration, without compromising patient-safety.


Author(s):  
Fabian van der Velden ◽  
Maria Tsolia ◽  
Enitan Carrol ◽  
Michael Levin ◽  
Werner Zenz ◽  
...  

2015 ◽  
Vol 70 (5) ◽  
pp. 1527-1530 ◽  
Author(s):  
K. Bochennek ◽  
A. Balan ◽  
L. Müller-Scholden ◽  
M. Becker ◽  
F. Farowski ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
pp. bmjspcare-2020-002753
Author(s):  
Sarah Szepetowski ◽  
Paul Saultier ◽  
Nicolas Andre ◽  
Vanessa Pauly ◽  
L. Lee Dupuis ◽  
...  

ObjectiveChildhood and adolescent cancer can result in high burden of distressing symptoms, particularly in high-risk malignancies. The Symptom Screening in Pediatrics Tool (SSPedi) is a reliable and valid approach to measure bothersome symptoms in paediatric patients receiving cancer treatments. Objective was to describe the feasibility of using SSPedi administration among paediatric patients with high-risk malignancies.MethodsWe conducted a single-centre, cross-sectional study of patients aged 8–18 years with high-risk malignancies in a French paediatric oncology unit. Patients self-reported the degree of bothersome symptoms using SSPedi and difficulty with SSPedi completion. The total SSPedi Score ranging from 0 to 60 (where 60 is worst) and most common moderately bothersome symptoms (scored ≥2 on 0–4 Likert Scale) were described. Feasibility was defined as more than 75% of patients agreeing to participate and more than 90% completion of SSPedi questionnaire.ResultsOut of 16 patients approached, 1 declined participation. Median age was 13 years (IQR 8–19). All were able to self-report SSPedi without difficulty. Patients experienced a median number of 6 (range 0–15) bothersome symptoms (score >0). The mean total SSPedi Score was 12 (SD=9.4). Most common moderately bothersome symptoms were pain (8/15), changes in hunger (8/15) and feeling tired (7/15).ConclusionPatient-reported symptom assessment among children and adolescents with high-risk malignancies is feasible using SSPedi. These patients experience a high burden of bothersome symptoms.


2007 ◽  
Vol 37 (3) ◽  
pp. 241-247 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nicoletta Masera ◽  
Luisa Tavecchia ◽  
Lorena Pozzi ◽  
Francesca Riva ◽  
Chiara Vimercati ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document