scholarly journals Sword 1 and 2: Subgroup Analysis of 48 Week Results by Age, Race and Gender

2017 ◽  
Vol 4 (suppl_1) ◽  
pp. S427-S427 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sharon Walmsley ◽  
Gary Richmond ◽  
Fritz Bredeek ◽  
Moti Ramgopal ◽  
Chien-Ching Hung ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Board Member ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Efficacy And Safety ◽  
Research Support ◽  
Once Daily ◽  
Race And Gender ◽  
Grant Recipient ◽  
And Gender ◽  
Hiv 1 ◽  
Research Grant

Abstract Background Switching to the 2-drug regimen (2DR) of DTG+RPV was proven non-inferior to continuing a suppressive PI-, INI- or NNRTI- based current antiretroviral regimen (CAR) at Week 48. This analysis evaluated the efficacy and safety of switching from CAR to DTG+RPV by age, race and gender subgroups. Methods Two identically designed, open-label, multicenter, global, phase III, non-inferiority studies compared the efficacy and safety of switching from a 3 or 4-drug CAR to DTG + RPV once daily in HIV-1-infected adults, with HIV-1 RNA<50 c/mL. Primary endpoint was proportion of patients with VL<50 c/mL at Wk48 using FDA Snapshot. Additional analysis were performed to summarize efficacy base on age, race and gender subgroups for each individual study and pooled. Results 1024 patients were randomized and exposed (DTG+RPV 513; CAR 511), across both studies. Treatment arms were well matched for demographic and baseline characteristics. Median age across both arms was 43.4 years, with 29% and 28% ≥ 50 years in DTG+RPV and CAR, respectively. 23% and 21% were female while 18% and 22% were non-white for DTG+RPV and CAR. For the pooled studies and for SWORD-1 and SWORD-2 individually, switching to DTG+RPV was non-inferior to CAR at Wk48. Similar response rates were observed in the DTG+RPV arm compared with CAR across subgroups (Table 1). More AEs were reported in the DTG+/RPV arm across all subgroups except Asian race; no unexpected AEs were identified for either drug. Conclusion Switch to a novel, once daily 2DR of DTG+RPV in patients with a suppressed viral load, was an effective and well tolerated treatment option across age, race, and gender subgroups which were consistent with overall results. Disclosures S. Walmsley, Merck: Board Member, Consultant, Grant Investigator, Investigator, Scientific Advisor and Speaker’s Bureau, Consulting fee, Grant recipient, Research grant and Speaker honorarium; ViiV Healthcare: Board Member, Consultant, Grant Investigator, Investigator, Scientific Advisor and Speaker’s Bureau, Consulting fee, Grant recipient, Research grant and Speaker honorarium; Gilead Sciences: Board Member, Consultant, Grant Investigator, Investigator, Scientific Advisor and Speaker’s Bureau, Consulting fee, Grant recipient, Research grant and Speaker honorarium; GSK: Board Member, Consultant, Grant Investigator, Investigator, Scientific Advisor and Speaker’s Bureau, Consulting fee, Grant recipient, Research grant and Speaker honorarium; Janssen: Board Member, Consultant, Grant Investigator, Investigator, Scientific Advisor and Speaker’s Bureau, Grant recipient, Research grant and Speaker honorarium; BMS: Grant Investigator, Investigator, Scientific Advisor and Speaker’s Bureau, Consulting fee, Grant recipient, Research grant and Speaker honorarium; G. Richmond, Viiv Healthcare: Investigator, Research support; 
 F. Bredeek, ViiV Healthcare: Investigator and Scientific Advisor, Consulting fee and Research support; M. Ramgopal, viiv: Investigator, Consulting fee; C. C. Hung, Gilead Sciences: Board Member and Speaker’s Bureau, Consulting fee and Speaker honorarium; ViiV: Board Member and Investigator, Consulting fee and Research support; Abbvie: Board Member and Investigator, Consulting fee and Research grant; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Investigator, Research support; Jassen: Board Member and Investigator, Consulting fee and Research support; E. Blair, ViiV Healthcare: Employee and Shareholder, Salary; L. Kahl, ViiV Healthcare: Employee and Shareholder, Salary; M. Underwood, ViiV Healthcare: Employee, Salary; K. Angelis, GlaxoSmithKline: Employee, Salary; K. Vandermeulen, Jansen: Employee, Salary; B. Wynne, ViiV Healthcare: Employee, Salary; M. Aboud, ViiV Healthcare: Employee, Salary

scholarly journals 1768. Efficacy and Safety of Switching From Boosted-Protease Inhibitors (bPI) Plus Emtricitabine/Tenofovir Disoproxil Fumarate (F/TDF) Regimens to the Once Daily (QD), Single-Tablet Regimen (STR) of Darunavir/Cobicistat/Emtricitabine/Tenofovir Alafenamide (D/C/F/TAF) in Virologically Suppressed, HIV-1-Infected Adults: Week 96 Results of the Phase 3, Randomized, Non-Inferiority EMERALD Trial

2018 ◽  
Vol 5 (suppl_1) ◽  
pp. S65-S65 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joseph Eron ◽  
Chloe Orkin ◽  
Douglas Cunningham ◽  
Federcio Pulido ◽  
Frank Post ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Extension Phase ◽  
Virologic Suppression ◽  
Efficacy And Safety ◽  
Research Support ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Genetic Barrier ◽  
Independent Contractor ◽  
Grant Recipient ◽  
Hiv 1 ◽  
Research Grant

Abstract Background The QD STR D/C/F/TAF 800/150/200/10 mg was noninferior to bPI + F/TDF at 48 weeks in EMERALD. Efficacy and safety of D/C/F/TAF through week 96 are presented. Methods EMERALD (NCT02269917) is a randomized, active-controlled, open-label, international, multicenter noninferiority trial. Virologically suppressed (VL<50 c/mL for ≥2 months) ART experienced (previous non-DRV VF allowed) HIV-1-infected adults were randomized (2:1) to switch to D/C/F/TAF or continue bPI + F/TDF over 48 weeks. Patients could then continue on D/C/F/TAF or switch from bPI + F/TDF to D/C/F/TAF at week 52 (Late switch, 44 weeks D/C/F/TAF exposure) in a single-arm extension phase until week 96. The percentage of patients with virologic rebound (confirmed VL ≥50 c/mL) cumulative through week 48 and week 96 were primary and secondary endpoints, respectively. Results Of 1141 randomized and treated patients (58% had received ≥5 previous ARVs including screening ARVs; 15% had previous non-DRV VF), 1,080 continued in the extension phase (N = 728 D/C/F/TAF; N = 352 late switch). Few patients had virologic rebound cumulative through week 96 in the D/C/F/TAF arm (3.1%, 24/763). Virologic rebound occurred in 2.3% (8/352) in the late switch arm over 44 weeks D/C/F/TAF treatment. Many rebounders (14/24 and 2/8) resuppressed by week 96. At week 96 a high percentage of patients in the D/C/F/TAF arm (90.7%, 692/763) were suppressed (VL<50 c/mL). In the late switch arm, 93.8% (330/352) maintained virologic suppression after 44 weeks of treatment. No DRV, primary PI, TFV, or FTC RAMs were seen post baseline. Few serious AEs and AE related discontinuations occurred in either arm (Table 1). Improvements in renal and bone parameters were maintained in the D/C/F/TAF arm and seen in the late switch arm (week 52–96), with a small change in TC/HDL-C ratio (Table 1). Conclusion Switching to D/C/F/TAF maintained high virologic suppression rates (>90%) at week 96 with no resistance development, and was well tolerated over 96 weeks with bone, renal, and lipid safety consistent with known TAF and cobicistat profiles. Efficacy and safety results in the late switch arm were consistent with week 48 results in the D/C/F/TAF arm. D/C/F/TAF combines the efficacy and high genetic barrier to resistance of DRV with the safety benefits of TAF, even in patients with a history of non-DRV VF. Disclosures J. Eron Jr., Gilead: Consultant and Grant Investigator, Consulting fee and Research grant. Janssen: Consultant, Consulting fee and Research grant. C. Orkin, AbbVie, Abbott, Boehringer Ingelheim, BMS, Gilead, GSK, Janssen, ViiV: Grant Investigator and Research Contractor, Research grant and Research support. D. Cunningham, Janssen: Investigator, Research grant. Gilead: Investigator, Research grant. F. Pulido, Janssen: Consultant, Investigator and Scientific Advisor, Consulting fee, Research support and Speaker honorarium. F. Post, Gilead: Consultant and Grant Investigator, Consulting fee and Grant recipient. Viiv: Grant Investigator, Grant recipient. Janssen: Consultant, Consulting fee. MSD: Consultant, Consulting fee. S. De Wit, Janssen: Investigator, Research grant. E. Lathouwers, Janssen: Employee and Shareholder, Salary. V. Hufkens, Janssen: Employee and Shareholder, Salary. R. Petrovic, Janssen R&D: Independent Contractor, Consulting fee. E. Van Landuyt, Janssen: Employee and Shareholder, Salary.

Doing More With Less: Review of Dolutegravir-Lamivudine, a Novel Single-Tablet Regimen for Antiretroviral-Naïve Adults With HIV-1 Infection

2020 ◽  
Vol 54 (12) ◽  
pp. 1252-1259
Author(s):  
Barbara A. Santevecchi ◽  
Stacy Miller ◽  
Lindsey M. Childs-Kean
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trials ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Virological Suppression ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Efficacy And Safety ◽  
Once Daily ◽  
Review Articles ◽  
Single Tablet Regimen ◽  
Treatment Naïve ◽  
Hiv 1

Objective: To review data on efficacy and safety of dolutegravir (DTG) and lamivudine (3TC) in treatment-naïve adults with HIV-1 infection. Data Sources: Phase III clinical trials and review articles were identified through PubMed (1996 to March 2020) and ClinicalTrials.gov (2000 to May 2020) using the keywords dolutegravir, lamivudine, and HIV. Study Selection and Data Extraction: Relevant clinical trials and review articles available in English evaluating efficacy and safety of DTG and 3TC were included. Data Synthesis: The once-daily, single-tablet regimen of DTG/3TC is the first dual antiretroviral therapy (ART) recommended for initial therapy in treatment-naïve adults with HIV-1 infection. DTG and 3TC were compared with a regimen of DTG and tenofovir disoproxil fumarate/emtricitabine in the GEMINI studies and demonstrated noninferiority for the primary end point of virological suppression at up to 96 weeks. No treatment-emergent resistance mutations were identified in a small group of participants who did not reach virological suppression. The regimen is well tolerated, and the most common adverse events reported in trials include headache, diarrhea, nausea, insomnia, and fatigue. Relevance to Patient Care and Clinical Practice: This dual-ART regimen is a favorable treatment option for ART-naïve patients with HIV-1 RNA <500 000 copies/mL, absence of hepatitis B virus, and no resistance to DTG or 3TC. Benefits of dual ART include reduction in treatment-related adverse events and toxicities, drug interactions, and cost. In addition, the once-daily, single-tablet formulation promotes adherence. Conclusions: DTG/3TC has demonstrated efficacy in maintaining virological suppression in ART-naïve patients at up to 96 weeks while minimizing treatment-related adverse events and toxicities.

scholarly journals 108. Selective Decay of Intact HIV-1 Proviral DNA on Antiretroviral Therapy

2020 ◽  
Vol 7 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S183-S183
Author(s):  
Rajesh Gandhi ◽  
Joshua Cyktor ◽  
Ronald Bosch ◽  
Hanna Mar ◽  
Gregory Laird ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Antiretroviral Therapy ◽  
Panel Member ◽  
Plasma Viremia ◽  
Research Support ◽  
Review Panel ◽  
Proviral Dna ◽  
Hiv 1 ◽  
Over Time ◽  
Residual Plasma Viremia ◽  
Research Grant

Abstract Background HIV-1 proviruses persist in people on antiretroviral therapy (ART) but most are defective and do not constitute a replication-competent reservoir. The decay of infected cells carrying intact compared with defective HIV-1 proviruses has not been well-defined in people on ART. Methods We separately quantified intact and defective proviruses (using an intact proviral DNA assay), residual plasma viremia, and markers of inflammation and activation in people on long-term ART. Longitudinal measurements were done at three timepoints: timepoint 1 was a median of 7.1 years on ART; timepoint 2 was a median of 3.7 years later; timepoint 3 was a median of 5.5 years after timepoint 1 and a median 12 years after starting ART (Figure 1). Figure 1: Study timepoints Results Among 40 participants tested longitudinally from a median of 7.1 years to 12 years after ART initiation, intact provirus levels declined significantly over time (median half-life 7.1 years; 95% confidence interval [CI], 3.9, 18), whereas defective provirus levels did not decrease. The median half-life of total HIV-1 DNA was 41.6 years (95% CI, 13.6, 75). When we evaluated the change in proviral DNA per year, intact proviral DNA declined significantly more (p&lt; 0.001) than defective proviral DNA (the latter did not change) (Figure 2). The proportion of all proviruses that were intact diminished over time on ART, from about 10% at the first on-ART timepoint to about 5% at the last timepoint (Figure 3). At timepoint 1, intact provirus levels on ART correlated with total HIV-1 DNA and residual plasma viremia, but there was no evidence for associations between intact provirus levels and inflammation or immune activation. Figure 2: Percent change in HIV-1 proviral DNA per year Figure 3: Total HIV-1 proviruses (grey bars) and the percentage of intact proviruses (red lines, displaying median, Q1, Q3) by timepoint. Conclusion Cells containing intact, replication-competent proviruses are selectively lost during suppressive ART. Defining the mechanisms involved should inform strategies to accelerate HIV-1 reservoir depletion. Disclosures Rajesh Gandhi, MD, Merck (Advisor or Review Panel member) Gregory Laird, PhD, Accelevir Diagnostics (Shareholder, Other Financial or Material Support, Employee) Albine Martin, PhD, Accelevir Diagnostics (Shareholder, Other Financial or Material Support, Employee) Bernard Macatangay, MD, Gilead (Grant/Research Support) Joseph J. Eron, MD, Gilead Sciences (Consultant, Research Grant or Support)Janssen (Consultant, Research Grant or Support)Merck (Consultant)ViiV Healthcare (Consultant, Research Grant or Support) Janet Siliciano, PhD, Gilead (Advisor or Review Panel member)US Military HIV Research Program (Advisor or Review Panel member) John Mellors, MD, Abound Bio (Shareholder)Accelevir Diagnostics (Consultant)Co-Crystal Pharmaceuticals (Shareholder)Gilead (Consultant, Grant/Research Support)Merck (Consultant)

scholarly journals LB2. Switch to Doravirine/Lamivudine/Tenofovir Disoproxil Fumarate (DOR/3TC/TDF) Maintains Virologic Suppression Through 48 Weeks: Results of the DRIVE-SHIFT Trial

2018 ◽  
Vol 5 (suppl_1) ◽  
pp. S759-S760 ◽  
Author(s):  
Princy Kumar ◽  
Margaret Johnson ◽  
Jean-Michel Molina ◽  
Giuliano Rizzardini ◽  
Pedro Cahn ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Tenofovir Disoproxil Fumarate ◽  
Stock Options ◽  
Advisory Board ◽  
Current Therapy ◽  
Virologic Suppression ◽  
Once Daily ◽  
Single Tablet Regimen ◽  
Hiv 1 ◽  
Switch Group ◽  
Research Grant

Abstract Background Doravirine is a novel, non-nucleoside reverse-transcriptase inhibitor (NNRTI) that has demonstrated efficacy in two Phase 3 trials in treatment-naïve adults with HIV-1. Methods This open-label, active-controlled, noninferiority (NI) trial evaluated a once-daily single-tablet regimen of doravirine 100 mg, lamivudine 300 mg, and tenofovir disoproxil fumarate 300 mg (DOR/3TC/TDF) vs. continuation of current therapy in adults with HIV-1 virologically suppressed for ≥6 months on a stable regimen of two NRTIs plus a boosted protease inhibitor (PI), boosted elvitegravir, or NNRTI. Participants with screening HIV-1 RNA &lt;40 copies/mL, no history of virologic failure on any regimen, and no resistance to DOR/3TC/TDF were randomized (2:1) to start DOR/3TC/TDF on Day 1 (immediate switch group, ISG) or after 24 weeks (delayed switch group, DSG). The primary endpoint was the proportion (%) of participants with HIV-1 RNA &lt;50 copies/mL (FDA snapshot approach), with the primary comparison between ISG at Week 48 and DSG at Week 24 and a secondary comparison between the groups at Week 24; the NI margin was -8%. The % of participants with HIV-1 RNA ≥50 copies/mL was also analyzed (FDA snapshot approach; NI margin 4%). Results A total of 670 participants (447 ISG, 223 DSG) were treated and included in the analyses; 84.5% were male, 76.4% were white, and mean age was 43.3 years. At Week 24, 93.7% (419/447) of ISG vs. 94.6% (211/223) of DSG had HIV-1 RNA &lt;50 copies/mL (difference −0.9% [−4.7, 3.0]), and 1.8% of each group had HIV-1 RNA ≥50 copies/mL. At Week 48, 90.8% (406/447) of ISG maintained HIV-1 RNA &lt;50 copies/mL (vs. 94.6% of DSG at Week 24; difference −3.8%, 95% CI [−7.9%, 0.3%]), and 1.6% of ISG had HIV-1 RNA ≥50 copies/mL. In the ritonavir-boosted PI stratum, mean changes in fasting LDL-C and non-HDL-C at Week 24 were significantly lower (P &lt; 0.0001) in ISG vs. DSG (table). Rates of any AE and of drug-related AEs at Week 24 were higher in ISG vs. DSG. AEs were mild in most ISG participants (64% of those with any AE; 80% of those with drug-related AEs). Conclusion A once-daily single-tablet regimen of DOR/3TC/TDF demonstrated non-inferior efficacy and acceptable safety compared with continuing therapy, and is an option for maintaining viral suppression in patients considering a change in therapy. Disclosures P. Kumar, Merck, Pfizer, Janssen,: Grant Investigator and Shareholder, Research grant. GSK, Gilead, Teratechnologies, TaiMed,: Grant Investigator, Scientific Advisor and Shareholder, Consulting fee and Research grant. J. M. Molina, Merck GIlead ViiV Janssen Teva: Ad Board and Speaker’s Bureau, Consulting fee. Gilead Sciences: Grant Investigator, Research support. G. Rizzardini, ViiV, Gilead Science, MSD, Angelini, and Abbvie: Board Member and Speaker’s Bureau, Speaker honorarium. Gliead, ViiV, and MSD: Research Contractor, Research grant. P. Cahn, Abbvie: Grant, Research grant. Merck: Grant, Advisory Board. ViiV Healthcare: Grant, Advisory Board. M. Bickel, Merck & Co., Inc.: Research Contractor, Research grant. Y. Zhou, Merck & Co., Inc.: Employee, Salary. C. Morais, Merck Sharp & Dohme, a subsidiary of Merck & Co., Inc.: Employee and Shareholder, May hold stock/stock options in the company and Salary. S. Kumar, Merck & Co., Inc.: Employee and Shareholder, Salary. P. Sklar, Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp., a subsidiary of Merck & Co., Inc.: Employee and Shareholder, Salary. G. J. Hanna, Merck Sharp & Dohme, a subsidiary of Merck & Co., inc.: Employee and Shareholder, May hold stock/stock options in the company. and Salary. C. Hwang, Merck Sharp & Dohme, a subsidiary of Merck & Co., Inc.: Employee and Shareholder, Salary. W. Greaves, Merck Sharp & Dohme, a subsidiary of Merck & Co., Inc.: Employee, May hold stock/stock options within the company.

scholarly journals LB1. Doravirine/Lamivudine/Tenofovir DF Continues to Be NonInferior to Efavirenz/Emtricitabine/Tenofovir DF in Treatment-Naïve Adults With HIV-1 Infection: Week 96 Results of the DRIVE-AHEAD Trial

2018 ◽  
Vol 5 (suppl_1) ◽  
pp. S759-S759 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chloe Orkin ◽  
Kathleen Squires ◽  
Jean-Michel Molina ◽  
Paul Sax ◽  
Wingwai Wong ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Stock Options ◽  
Fixed Dose ◽  
Phase 3 ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Phenotypic Resistance ◽  
Grant Recipient ◽  
Tenofovir Df ◽  
Treatment Naïve ◽  
Hiv 1 ◽  
Research Grant

Abstract Background Doravirine (DOR) is a novel non-nucleoside reverse-transcriptase inhibitor (NNRTI). In the phase 3 DRIVE-AHEAD trial in HIV-1-infected treatment-naïve adults, DOR demonstrated noninferior efficacy to efavirenz (EFV) and favorable profiles for neuropsychiatric tolerability and lipids at 48 weeks. We present data through week 96. Methods DRIVE- AHEAD (Clinical Trials Registration: NCT02403674) is a phase 3, multicenter, double-blind, noninferiority trial that compared DOR with EFV. Eligible participants were HIV-1-infected treatment-naïve adults with pre-treatment HIV-1 RNA ≥1,000 copies/mL. Participants were randomized (1:1) to a fixed-dose regimen of DOR 100 mg, lamivudine 300 mg and tenofovir disoproxil fumarate 300 mg (DOR/3TC/TDF) QD or EFV 600 mg, emtricitabine 200 mg and TDF 300 mg (EFV/FTC/TDF) QD for up to 96 weeks. Randomization was stratified by screening HIV-1 RNA (≤/&gt;100,000 copies/mL) and hepatitis B/C co-infection (yes/no). The efficacy endpoint of interest at week 96 was HIV-1 RNA &lt;50 copies/mL with predefined noninferiority margin of 10%. Safety endpoints of interest included occurrence of pre-specified neuropsychiatric adverse events and mean change from baseline in fasting lipid levels at week 96. Results Of 734 participants randomized, 728 received study drug and were included in analyses (mean age 33 years, 85% male, 48% white, 19% black, 34% Hispanic). At week 96, HIV-1 RNA &lt;50 copies/mL was achieved by 77.5% of DOR/3TC/TDF recipients vs. 73.6% of EFV/FTC/TDF recipients (difference 3.8%, 95%CI [−2.4, 10.0]). No additional phenotypic resistance to DOR was observed between weeks 48 and 96, while two additional participants in the EFV/FTC/TDF group developed resistance to EFV. Dizziness, sleep disorders/disturbances, altered sensorium, and rash were less frequent in DOR/3TC/TDF recipients than in EFV/FTC/TDF recipients. Fasting LDL-C and non-HDL-C increased in the EFV/FTC/TDF group but not in the DOR/3TC/TDF group, while change in total cholesterol/HDL-C ratio was similar. Conclusion Week 96 results support non-inferiority of DOR/3TC/TFD to EFV/FTC/TDF established at Week 48 with no additional DOR resistance between week 48 and 96. DOR/3TC/TDF was safe and well-tolerated with fewer neuropsychiatric and rash events and favorable lipid profile compared with EFV/FTC/TDF. Disclosures C. Orkin, AbbVie, Abbott, Boehringer Ingelheim, BMS, Gilead, GSK, Janssen, ViiV: Grant Investigator and Research Contractor, Research grant and Research support. K. Squires, Merck & Co., Inc.: Ad Board, Ad Board. Gilead Sciences: Grant, Ad Board. VIIV: Ad Board, Ad Board. Bristol Myers Squibb: Ad Board, Ad Board. Janssen: Ad Board, Ad Board. J. M. Molina, Gilead: Scientific Advisor, Consulting fee. Merck: Scientific Advisor, Consulting fee. ViiV: Scientific Advisor, Consulting fee. Teva: Scientific Advisor, Consulting fee. P. Sax, Gilead: Consultant and Grant Investigator, Consulting fee, Grant recipient and Research grant. ViiV Healthcare: Consultant and Grant Investigator, Consulting fee, Grant recipient and Research grant. Merck: Consultant and Grant Investigator, Consulting fee, Grant recipient and Research grant. Janssen: Consultant, Consulting fee. BMS: Grant Investigator, Grant recipient and Research grant. W. Wong, Merck & Co., Inc.: Research Contractor, Research grant. G. Lin, Merck Sharp & Dohme, a subsidiary of Merck & Co., Inc.: Employee and Shareholder, May hold stock/stock options in the company and Salary. S. Kumar, Merck & Co., Inc.: Employee and Shareholder, Salary. G. Hanna, Merck & Co., Inc.: Employee and Shareholder, Salary. C. Hwang, Merck & Co., Inc.: Employee and Shareholder, Salary. E. Martin, Merck & Co., Inc.: Employee and Shareholder, Salary. H. Teppler, Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp., a subsidiary of Merck & Co., Inc., Kenilworth, NJ, USA: Employee, May hold stock/stock options in the company and Salary.

Efficacy and safety of once-daily darunavir/ritonavir versus lopinavir/ritonavir in treatment-naive HIV-1-infected patients at week 48

AIDS ◽  
2008 ◽  
Vol 22 (12) ◽  
pp. 1389-1397 ◽  
Author(s):  
Roberto Ortiz ◽  
Edwin DeJesus ◽  
Homayoon Khanlou ◽  
Evgeniy Voronin ◽  
Jan van Lunzen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Efficacy And Safety ◽  
Once Daily ◽  
Treatment Naïve ◽  
Hiv 1
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document