scholarly journals 1763. Estimating Median Survival Time to Central Line-Associated Bloodstream Infection (CLABSI) Among Patients in Intensive Care Units Reported to National Healthcare Safety Network (NHSN)

2018 ◽  
Vol 5 (suppl_1) ◽  
pp. S62-S63
Author(s):  
Minn Soe ◽  
Jonathan R Edwards

Abstract Background Duration free of central line-associated bloodstream infection (CLABSI) in a hospital may vary by type of patient population. We estimated patients’ median time to CLABSI by intensive care unit (ICU) type among acute care hospitals. Methods The study population was ICU patients whose CLABSI data were reported to National Healthcare Safety Network (NHSN) in 2016 under the reporting requirement of the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid. The unit of analysis was ICU location, not an individual patient. We conducted counting process survival analysis method to compute time (day) to a CLABSI beginning from day 1 of first reporting month in 2016 in a given ICU location. Once a CLABSI occurred in a location, the start time of follow-up was reset to day 1 after the date of event. The Cox regression method was used to explore the hospital and location-level characteristics that are potentially associated with the daily hazard of CLABSI for an ICU. We also assessed the proportionality hazard assumption of these factors. Adjusting for the vector of means of covariates, we then estimated median time to CLABSI by ICU location type, which is defined as follow-up time (days) by which 50% of events have happened in a given ICU type. Results In 2016, 6,935 ICUs at 3,384 hospitals reported CLABSI data to NHSN, with a total of 10,985 CLABSIs and 2,449,361 follow-up time in days. Factors associated with an increased daily hazard of CLABSI were the following: admission to a hospital with a large bed size, major teaching status, and admission to a patient care location with a higher device utilization ratio (Table 1). Adjusted survival curves showed that median time to event (median CLABSI-free time) among ICUs ranged from 66 days (level III neonatal ICU), 90 days (burn units) to 275 days (oncology units), and 284 days (cardiothoracic units) (Table 2, Figure 1). Conclusion The study demonstrated that ICUs with level III care for neonatal patients and ICUs with burn patients were least likely to achieve the target of “zero” infection in a defined period and may warrant further targeted interventions. Similar research to investigate infection control performance through estimating median infection-free time is needed beyond ICUs and across multiple HAI types and facility settings. Disclosures All authors: No reported disclosures.

2013 ◽  
Vol 34 (7) ◽  
pp. 663-670 ◽  
Author(s):  
Aditya H. Gaur ◽  
Marlene R. Miller ◽  
Cuilan Gao ◽  
Carol Rosenberg ◽  
Gloria C. Morrell ◽  
...  

Objective.To evaluate the application of the National Healthcare Safety Network (NHSN) central line-associated bloodstream infection (CLABSI) definition in pediatric intensive care units (PICUs) and pediatric hematology/oncology units (PHOUs) participating in a multicenter quality improvement collaborative to reduce CLABSIs; to identify sources of variability in the application of the definition.Design.Online survey using 18 standardized case scenarios. Each described a positive blood culture in a patient and required a yes-or-no answer to the question “Is this a CLABSI?” NHSN staff responses were the reference standard.Setting.Sixty-five US PICUs and PHOUs.Participants.Staff who routinely adjudicate CLABSIs using NHSN definitions.Results.Sixty responses were received from 58 (89%) of 65 institutions; 78% of respondents were infection preventionists, infection control officers, or infectious disease physicians. Responses matched those of NHSN staff for 78% of questions. The mean (SE) percentage of concurring answers did not differ for scenarios evaluating application of 1 of the 3 criteria (“known pathogen,” 78% [1.7%]; “skin contaminant, >1 year of age,” 76% [SE, 2.5%]; “skin contaminant, ≤1 year of age,” 81% [3.8%]; P = .3 ). The mean percentage of concurring answers was lower for scenarios requiring respondents to determine whether a CLABSI was present or incubating on admission (64% [4.6%]; P = .017) or to distinguish between primary and secondary bacteremia (65% [2.5%]; P = .021).Conclusions.The accuracy of application of the CLABSI definition was suboptimal. Efforts to reduce variability in identifying CLABSIs that are present or incubating on admission and in distinguishing primary from secondary bloodstream infection are needed.


2016 ◽  
Vol 37 (6) ◽  
pp. 692-698 ◽  
Author(s):  
Caroline O’Neil ◽  
Kelly Ball ◽  
Helen Wood ◽  
Kathleen McMullen ◽  
Pamala Kremer ◽  
...  

OBJECTIVETo evaluate a central line care maintenance bundle to reduce central line–associated bloodstream infection (CLABSI) in non–intensive care unit settings.DESIGNBefore-after trial with 12-month follow-up period.SETTINGA 1,250-bed teaching hospital.PARTICIPANTSPatients with central lines on 8 general medicine wards. Four wards received the intervention and 4 served as controls.INTERVENTIONA multifaceted catheter care maintenance bundle consisting of educational programs for nurses, update of hospital policies, visual aids, a competency assessment, process monitoring, regular progress reports, and consolidation of supplies necessary for catheter maintenance.RESULTSData were collected for 25,542 catheter-days including 43 CLABSI (rate, 1.68 per 1,000 catheter-days) and 4,012 catheter dressing observations. Following the intervention, a 2.5% monthly decrease in the CLABSI incidence density was observed on intervention floors but this was not statistically significant (95% CI, −5.3% to 0.4%). On control floors, there was a smaller but marginally significant decrease in CLABSI incidence during the study (change in monthly rate, −1.1%; 95% CI, −2.1% to −0.1%). Implementation of the bundle was associated with improvement in catheter dressing compliance on intervention wards (78.8% compliance before intervention vs 87.9% during intervention/follow-up; P<.001) but improvement was also observed on control wards (84.9% compliance before intervention vs 90.9% during intervention/follow-up; P=.001).CONCLUSIONSA multifaceted program to improve catheter care was associated with improvement in catheter dressing care but no change in CLABSI rates. Additional study is needed to determine strategies to prevent CLABSI in non–intensive care unit patients.Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2016;37:692–698


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document