Robotic Sacroiliac Fixation Technique for Triangular Titanium Implant in Adult Degenerative Scoliosis Surgery: 2-Dimensional Operative Video

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Connor Berlin ◽  
Parantap Patel ◽  
Isador Lieberman ◽  
Mark Shaffrey ◽  
Avery Buchholz
Keyword(s):  
Back Pain ◽  
Sacroiliac Joint ◽  
Titanium Implants ◽  
Leg Pain ◽  
Definitive Treatment ◽  
Scoliosis Surgery ◽  
Corrective Surgery ◽  
Degenerative Scoliosis ◽  
Adult Degenerative Scoliosis ◽  
K Wires

Abstract Corrective surgery remains a definitive treatment for adult spinal deformity, improving pain and disability. With these cases, instrumentation to the pelvis with iliac fixation is recommended. Whether iliac or S2-Alar-Iliac (S2AI) trajectories are used, sacroiliac joint pain and long-term sacroilitis can be common after long-fusion constructs.1-3 Sacroiliac fusion with triangular titanium implants during fusion can reduce back pain associated with sacroiliac joint degeneration,3 provides reduction in sacroiliac joint motion and stress when added to S2AI screws, and potentially enhances mechanical stability of fusion constructs.4 Here, we present a technique for placing triangular titanium sacroiliac implants (iFuse BedrockTM; SI-BONE Inc, Santa Clara, California) alongside S2AI screws using a robotic platform (Mazor X; Medtronic Sofamor Danek, Medtronic Inc, Dublin, Ireland). Navigated robotics allows reduction in human error with implant placement, and potentially decreased operative time/fluoroscopy.5-7 Key surgical steps include placement of K wires for S2AI and bilateral SI-implants, tapping, replacing SI-implant K wires with guide pins, placing S2AI screws, and finally placing the SI-implant. Final placement is verified with intraoperative fluoroscopy. The patient described is a 61-yr-old woman with worsening adult degenerative scoliosis, lower back pain, left leg radicular pain, and mild right leg pain who failed conservative treatment. Examination revealed diminished strength in both legs. Imaging was significant for moderate sigmoid scoliosis, discogenic disease, and osteoarthritis at all levels. She consented to undergo corrective surgery. Postoperatively, the patient experienced resolution of her leg weakness and pain. Imaging demonstrated appropriate positioning of hardware. Prospective studies on the efficacy of the SI-implant are underway.

Interdisciplinary Care Model Independently Decreases Use of Critical Care Services After Corrective Surgery for Adult Degenerative Scoliosis

2018 ◽  
Vol 111 ◽  
pp. e845-e849 ◽  
Author(s):  
Owoicho Adogwa ◽  
Aladine A. Elsamadicy ◽  
Amanda R. Sergesketter ◽  
Michael Ongele ◽  
Victoria Vuong ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Critical Care ◽  
Interdisciplinary Care ◽  
Corrective Surgery ◽  
Care Model ◽  
Degenerative Scoliosis ◽  
Care Services ◽  
Adult Degenerative Scoliosis

scholarly journals Minimally invasive anterior lumbar interbody fusion for adult degenerative scoliosis with 1 or 2 dislocated levels

2015 ◽  
Vol 23 (6) ◽  
pp. 739-746 ◽  
Author(s):  
Charles-Henri Flouzat-Lachaniette ◽  
Louis Ratte ◽  
Alexandre Poignard ◽  
Jean-Charles Auregan ◽  
Steffen Queinnec ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Minimally Invasive ◽  
Interbody Fusion ◽  
Anterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion ◽  
Leg Pain ◽  
Lumbar Interbody Fusion ◽  
Degenerative Scoliosis ◽  
Surgical Morbidity ◽  
Adult Degenerative Scoliosis ◽  
The Mean

OBJECT Frequent complications of posterolateral instrumented fusion have been reported after treatment of degenerative scoliosis in elderly patients. Considering that in some cases, most of the symptomatology of adult degenerative scoliosis (ADS) is a consequence of the segmental instability at the dislocated level, the use of minimally invasive anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF) to manage symptoms can be advocated to reduce surgical morbidity. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the midterm outcomes of 1- or 2-level minimally invasive ALIFs in ADS patients with 1- or 2-level dislocations. METHODS A total of 47 patients (average age 64 years; range 43–80 years) with 1- or 2-level ALIF performed for ADS (64 levels) in a single institution were included in the study. An independent spine surgeon retrospectively reviewed all the patients’ medical records and radiographs to assess operative data and surgery-related complications. Clinical outcome was reported using the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) and the visual analog scale (VAS) for lumbar and leg pain. Intraoperative data and complications were collected. Fusion and risk for adjacent-level degeneration were assessed. RESULTS The mean follow-up duration was 3 years (range 1–10 years). ODI, and back and leg pain VAS scores were significantly improved at last follow-up. A majority of patients (74%) had a statistically significant improvement in their ODI score of more than 20 points at latest follow-up and 1 had a worsening of his disability. The mean operating time was 166 minutes (range 70–355 minutes). The mean estimated blood loss was 410 ml (range 50–1700 ml). Six (5 major and 1 minor) surgical complications (12.7% of patients) and 13 (2 major and 11 minor) medical complications (27.7% of patients) occurred without death or wound infection. Fusion was achieved in 46 of 47 patients. Surgery resulted in a slight but significant decrease of the Cobb angle, and improved the pelvic parameters and lumbar lordosis, but had no effect on the global sagittal balance. At latest follow-up, 9 patients (19.1%) developed adjacent-segment disease at a mean of 2 years’ delay from the index surgery; 4 were symptomatic but treated medically, and none required iterative surgery. CONCLUSIONS Single- or 2-level minimally invasive fusion through a minimally invasive anterior approach in some selected cases of ADS produced a good functional outcome with a high fusion rate. They were associated with a significantly lower rate of complications in this study than the historical control.

scholarly journals Radiographic and clinical outcomes following combined lateral lumbar interbody fusion and posterior segmental stabilization in patients with adult degenerative scoliosis

2014 ◽  
Vol 36 (5) ◽  
pp. E11 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zachary J. Tempel ◽  
Gurpreet S. Gandhoke ◽  
Christopher M. Bonfield ◽  
David O. Okonkwo ◽  
Adam S. Kanter
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Outcomes ◽  
Lumbar Lordosis ◽  
Hybrid Approach ◽  
Vertical Axis ◽  
Leg Pain ◽  
Degenerative Scoliosis ◽  
Sagittal Vertical Axis ◽  
Adult Degenerative Scoliosis ◽  
The Mean

Object A hybrid approach of minimally invasive lateral lumbar interbody fusion (LLIF) followed by supplementary open posterior segmental instrumented fusion (PSIF) has shown promising early results in the treatment of adult degenerative scoliosis. Studies assessing the impact of this combined approach on correction of segmental and regional coronal angulation, sagittal realignment, maximum Cobb angle, restoration of lumbar lordosis, and clinical outcomes are needed. The authors report their results of this approach for correction of adult degenerative scoliosis. Methods Twenty-six patients underwent combined LLIF and PSIF in a staged fashion. The patient population consisted of 21 women and 5 men. Ages ranged from 40 to 77 years old. Radiographic measurements including coronal angulation, pelvic incidence, lumbar lordosis, and sagittal vertical axis were taken preoperatively and 1 year postoperatively in all patients. Concurrently, the visual analog score (VAS) for back and leg pain, the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), and Short Form-36 (SF-36) Physical Component Summary (PCS) and Mental Component Summary (MCS) scores were used to assess clinical outcomes in 19 patients. Results At 1-year follow-up, all patients who underwent combined LLIF and PSIF achieved statistically significant mean improvement in regional coronal angles (from 14.9° to 5.8°, p < 0.01) and segmental coronal angulation at all operative levels (p < 0.01). The maximum Cobb angle was significantly reduced postoperatively (from 41.1° to 15.1°, p < 0.05) and was maintained at follow-up (12.0°, p < 0.05). The mean lumbar lordosis–pelvic incidence mismatch was significantly improved postoperatively (from 15.0° to 6.92°, p < 0.05). Although regional lumbar lordosis improved (from 43.0° to 48.8°), it failed to reach statistical significance (p = 0.06). The mean sagittal vertical axis was significantly improved postoperatively (from 59.5 mm to 34.2 mm, p < 0.01). The following scores improved significantly after surgery: VAS for back pain (from 7.5 to 4.3, p < 0.01) and leg pain (from 5.8 to 3.1, p < 0.01), ODI (from 48 to 38, p < 0.01), and PCS (from 27.5 to 35.0, p = 0.01); the MCS score did not improve significantly (from 43.2 to 45.5, p = 0.37). There were 3 major and 10 minor complications. Conclusions A hybrid approach of minimally invasive LLIF and open PSIF is an effective means of achieving correction of both coronal and sagittal deformity, resulting in improvement of quality of life in patients with adult degenerative scoliosis.

scholarly journals Multivariable Analysis of the Relationship Between Pain Referral Patterns and the Source of Chronic Low Back Pain

2012 ◽  
Vol 2;15 (2;3) ◽  
pp. 171-178
Author(s):  
Michael J. DePalma
Keyword(s):  
Low Back Pain ◽  
Back Pain ◽  
Chronic Low Back Pain ◽  
Sacroiliac Joint ◽  
Joint Pain ◽  
Facet Joint ◽  
Thigh Pain ◽  
Leg Pain ◽  
Low Back ◽  
Referral Patterns

Background: Discogenic, facet joint, and sacroiliac joint mediated axial low back pain may be associated with overlapping pain referral patterns into the lower limb. Differences between pain referral patterns for these three structures have not been systematically investigated. Objective: To examine the individual and combined relationship of age, hip/girdle pain, leg pain, and thigh pain and the source of internal disc disruption (IDD), facet joint pain (FJP), or sacroiliac joint pain (SIJP) in consecutive chronic low back pain (CLBP) patients. Design: Retrospective chart review. Setting: Community based interventional spine practice. Patients: 378 cases from 358 consecutive patients were reviewed and 157 independent cases from 153 patients who underwent definitive diagnostic injections were analyzed. Methods: Charts of consecutive low back pain patients who underwent definitive diagnostic spinal procedures were retrospectively reviewed. Patients underwent provocation lumbar discography, dual diagnostic medial branch blocks, or intra-articular diagnostic sacroiliac joint injections based on clinical presentation. Some subjects underwent multiple diagnostic injections until the source of their chronic low back pain (CLBP) was identified. Main Outcome Measurements: Based on the results of diagnostic injections, subjects were classified as having IDD, FJP, SIJP, or other. The mean age/standard deviation and the count/percentage of patients reporting hip girdle pain, leg pain, or thigh pain were estimated for each diagnostic group and compared statistically among the IDD, FJP, SIJP, and other source groups. Next, the 4 predictor variables were simultaneously modeled with a single multinomial logistic regression model to explore the adjusted relationship between the predictors and the source of CLBP. Results: The mean age was significantly different among the source groups. IDD cases were significantly younger than FJP, SIJP, and other source groups and FJP cases were significantly younger than other sources. The age by thigh pain interaction effect was statistically significant (P = 0.021), indicating that the effect of age on the source of CLBP depends on thigh pain, and similarly, that the effect of thigh pain on the source of CLBP depends on age. Limitations: Retrospective study design. Conclusions: The presence or absence of thigh pain possesses a significant correlation on the source of CLBP for varying ages, whereas the presence of hip/girdle pain or leg pain did not significantly discriminate among IDD, FJP, or SIJP as the etiology of CLBP. Younger age was predictive of IDD regardless of the presence or absence of thigh pain. Key words: low back pain, intervertebral disc, zygapophyseal joint, sacroiliac joint, pain referral patterns

scholarly journals 1-Year Results of a Randomized Controlled Trial of Conservative Management vs. Minimally Invasive Surgical Treatment for Sacroiliac Joint Pain

2017 ◽  
Vol 6 (20;6) ◽  
pp. 537-550 ◽  
Author(s):  
Julius Dengler
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Randomized Controlled Trial ◽  
Minimally Invasive ◽  
Sacroiliac Joint ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Titanium Implants ◽  
Leg Pain ◽  
Recurrent Pain ◽  
Randomized Controlled

Background: Low back pain (LBP) emanating from the sacroiliac joint (SIJ) is a common finding. Devices to fuse the SIJ are now commercially available, but high-quality evidence supporting their effectiveness is limited. Objectives: To compare the safety and effectiveness of conservative management (CM) to minimally invasive sacroiliac joint fusion (SIJF) in patients with chronic LBP originating from the SIJ. Study Design: Prospective, multicenter randomized controlled trial. Setting: One hundred three adults in spine clinics with chronic LBP originating from the SIJ. Methods: Patients were randomly assigned to CM (n = 51) or SIJF using triangular titanium implants (n = 52). CM consisted of optimization of medical therapy, individualized physiotherapy, and adequate information and reassurance as part of a multifactorial treatment. The primary outcome was the difference in change in self-rated LBP at 6 months using a 0 – 100 visual analog scale (VAS). Other effectiveness and safety endpoints, including leg pain, disability using Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), quality of life using EQ-5D, and SIJ function using active straight leg raise test (ASLR), were assessed up to 12 months. Results: At 12 months, mean LBP improved by 41.6 VAS points in the SIJF group vs. 14.0 points in the CM group (treatment difference of 27.6 points, P < 0.0001). Mean ODI improved by 25.0 points in the SIJF group vs. 8.7 points in the CM group (P < 0.0001). Mean improvements in leg pain and EQ-5D scores were large after SIJF and superior to those after CM. CM patients were allowed to crossover to SIJF after 6 months. Patients who crossed to surgical treatment had no pre-crossover improvement in pain and ODI scores; after crossover, improvements were as large as those originally assigned to SIJF. One case of postoperative nerve impingement occurred in the surgical group. Two SIJF patients had recurrent pain attributed to possible device loosening and one had postoperative hematoma. In the CM group, one crossover surgery patient had recurrent pain requiring a revision surgery. Limitations: The primary limitation was lack of blinding and the subjective nature of self-assessed outcomes. Conclusions: For patients with chronic LBP originating from the SIJ, minimally invasive SIJF with triangular titanium implants was safe and more effective than CM in relieving pain, reducing disability, and improving patient function and quality of life. Our findings will help to inform decisions regarding its use as a treatment option in this patient population.

Complications in adult degenerative scoliosis surgery

2017 ◽  
Vol 29 (2) ◽  
pp. 118-122
Author(s):  
Shyam M. Shridharani ◽  
Brent A. Munroe ◽  
Kenneth A. Hood
Keyword(s):  
Scoliosis Surgery ◽  
Degenerative Scoliosis ◽  
Adult Degenerative Scoliosis

The Sacroiliac Joint as a Cause of Pain – Review of the Sacroiliac Joint Morphology and Models for Pain Genesis

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anna Völker ◽  
Hanno Steinke ◽  
Christoph-Eckhard Heyde
Keyword(s):  
Back Pain ◽  
Sacroiliac Joint ◽  
Radicular Pain ◽  
Leg Pain ◽  
Joint Stability ◽  
Anatomical Structures ◽  
Dorsal Rami ◽  
Lateral Branches ◽  
Complex Joint ◽  
Pain Generator

Abstract Introduction In recent years, the sacroiliac joint has become increasingly important as a generator of low back pain with and without pseudo-radicular pain in the legs. Up to 27% of reported back pain is generated by disorders in the sacroiliac joint. Method This review is based on a selective literature search of the sacroiliac joint (SIJ) as a possible pain generator. It also considers the anatomical structures and innervation of the sacroiliac joint. Results The SIJ is a complex joint in the region of the posterior pelvis and is formed by the sacrum and the ilium bones. The SIJ is very limited in movement in all three planes. Joint stability is ensured by the shape and especially by strong interosseous and extraosseous ligaments. Different anatomical variants of the sacroiliac joint, such as additional extra-articular secondary joints or ossification centres, can be regularly observed in CT scans. There is still controversy in the literature regarding innervation. However, there is agreement on dorsal innervation of the sacroiliac joint from lateral branches of the dorsal rami of the spinal nerves S I–S III with proportions of L III and L IV as well S IV. Nerve fibres and mechanoreceptors can also be detected in the surrounding ligaments. Conclusion A closer look at the anatomy and innervation of the SIJ shows that the SIJ is more than a simple joint. The complex interaction of the SIJ with its surrounding structures opens the possibility that pain arises from this area. The SIJ and its surrounding structures should be included in the diagnosis and treatment of back and leg pain. Published literature include a number of plausible models for the sacroiliac joint as pain generator. The knowledge of the special anatomy, the complex innervation as well as the special and sometimes very individual functionality of this joint, enhance our understanding of associated pathologies and complaints.

scholarly journals Minimally Invasive Interlaminar Decompression with a 10-mm Endoscope and Microscope in Cases of Adult Degenerative Scoliosis

2021 ◽  
Vol 24 (6) ◽  
pp. E867-E875
Keyword(s):  
Minimally Invasive ◽  
De Novo ◽  
Leg Pain ◽  
Lumbar Stenosis ◽  
Degenerative Scoliosis ◽  
Invasive Treatment ◽  
Japanese Orthopedic Association ◽  
Adult Degenerative Scoliosis ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
The Mean

BACKGROUND: Adult degenerative (de novo) scoliosis (ADS) usually occurs due to degenerative changes and is accompanied by progressive low-back pain and/or symptomatic lumbar stenosis. Interlaminar decompression is considered an effective treatment of lumbar stenosis, but some surgical contraindications to traditional open surgery limit its application in elderly patients with many disorders. A 10-mm endoscope has been used in the treatment of stenosis in individuals with ADS and its safety and efficacy should be assessed. OBJECTIVE: The objective was to conduct a retrospective analysis to compare interlaminar decompression with a 10-mm endoscope versus a microscope. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective study. SETTING: This study took place at the First Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University. METHODS: The data of 34 ADS patients treated in our hospital from January 2018 to December 2019, who underwent decompression with a 10-mm endoscope (ES group, 19 patients) or microscope (MS group, 15 patients) were retrospectively reviewed. The two methods were compared using the visual analog scale (VAS), Japanese orthopedic association (JOA) scale, and Oswestry disability index (ODI). Lumbar stability was also evaluated by the progression of scoliosis. RESULTS: There were no significant differences between the 2 groups in demographic or clinical characteristics. The mean preoperative Cobb angle of all patients was 23.34° ± 6.44°, which indicated degenerative scoliosis. The mean JOA and ODI scores were 8.09 ± 1.44 and 55.47 ± 11.91. The mean preoperative pelvic incidence (PI) and lumbar lordosis (LL) angles were 51.02° ± 7.21 and 38.26° ± 6.98 and the mean PI-LL mismatch was 12.76° ± 5.63. There was no significant difference in the VAS scores for back/leg pain between the groups at 1 week after the operation, but the scores of the ES group were significantly higher than those of the MS group at 3 months and 12 months. There were no significant differences of mean JOA and ODI between the ES and MS groups preoperatively, at 3 months, or at 12 months, but the JOA and ODI scores of the ES group were significantly higher than those of the MS group 1 week after the operation. LIMITATIONS: The study showed that a novel method for the minimally invasive treatment of ADS is feasible; the safety and outcomes of this method should be verified with more cases. CONCLUSIONS: Minimally invasive decompression with a 10-mm endoscope was suggested to be a safe and effective method, as expected, for the treatment of lumbar stenosis in ADS patients. KEY WORDS: Adult degenerative scoliosis, endoscope, lumbar stability, microscopic decompression, minimally invasive

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document