Evaluation of the Lacrimal System

Author(s):  
John V. Linberg

The common complaint of a watering eye may be caused by a variety of problems, including lacrimal hyposecretion, lacrimal hypersecretion, or blockage of the lacrimal drainage system. This system is a complex membranous channel whose function depends on the interaction of anatomy and physiology. Effective tear drainage depends on a variety of factors, including the volume of tear secretion, eyelid position, and anatomy of the lacrimal drainage passages. Epiphora is defined as an abnormal overflow of tears down the cheek. The patient with symptomatic tearing may have a normal lacrimal drainage system overwhelmed by primary or secondary (reflex) hypersecretion or a drainage system that is anatomically compromised and unable to handle normal tear production. On the other hand, a patient with partial drainage obstruction may have a concomitant reduction in tear production and therefore be completely asymptomatic or may even suffer from symptomatic dry eye syndrome. Epiphora is determined by the balance between tear production and tear drainage, not by the absolute function or dysfunction of either one. The causes of lacrimal drainage problems can be divided into two categories: anatomic and functional. Anatomic obstruction refers to a mechanical or structural abnormality of the drainage system. The obstruction may be complete, such as punctal occlusion, canalicular blockage, or nasolacrimal duct fibrosis, or partial, caused by punctal stenosis, canalicular stenosis, or mechanical obstruction within the lacrimal sac (i.e., dacryolith or tumor). In patients with functional obstruction, epiphora results not from anatomic blockage but from a failure of lacrimal drainage physiology. This failure may be caused by anatomic deformity such as punctal eversion or other eyelid malpositions, but can also result from lacrimal pump inadequacy caused by weak orbicularis muscle action. It is helpful to determine whether the patient’s complaint is true epiphora or a “watery eye.” Detailed history-taking and careful examination will help direct the evaluation of a tearing eye. A host of clinical tests have been described, and the selection of appropriate tests will depend on the initial history and ophthalmic examination. 13-1-1 History-Taking. Any clinical evaluation should begin with a thorough history. A complaint of watery eye does not necessarily imply a lacrimal drainage problem.

2021 ◽  
pp. 112067212110080
Author(s):  
Nishi Gupta ◽  
Poonam Singla ◽  
Suma Ganesh

Purpose: Sialoendoscope was used as a dacryoendoscope, high- definition images of the lacrimal drainage system (LDS) were captured and its performance in congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction (CNLDO) is reported. Methods: Nasal endoscopy was done as the first in all the cases using a 0°, 2.7 mm nasal endoscope (Karl Stroz Tutlingan Germany). This was followed by Dacryoendoscopy (DEN) of the lacrimal drainage system from puncta till the valve of Hasner. DEN was performed under general anaesthesia in 26 children (including 17 primary and 9 failed probing cases). All cases were examined using 0.8 mm sialoendoscope (Karl Storz, Tuttlingen, Germany) with fibreoptic light transmission with a side port for irrigation. Results: We were able to obtain high-definition images of canaliculi, lacrimal sac, sac duct junction, proximal, mid and distal segments of nasolacrimal duct in all the children with CNLDO. In 17 primary cases 16 had distal membranous obstruction and I case had proximal canalicular obstruction. In nine children with history of failed probing, five had membranous obstruction, two had dacryoliths, two had NLD malformation at different levels. An overall success rate of 88.4% was achieved. Conclusion: Sialoendoscope can be used as high-definition dacryoendoscope for diagnostic and therapeutic use in CNLDO. Useful information can be obtained on dacryoendoscopy in complex CNLDO cases.


2010 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 159-162
Author(s):  
Suppapong Tirakunwichcha ◽  
Ehwika Rengwanidchakul ◽  
Somkiat Asawaphureekorn ◽  
Supaporn Tengtrisorn ◽  
Khanchai Juangphanich ◽  
...  

Abstract Background: There were few reports regarding the incidence of the acquired nasolacrimal duct obstruction, and the incidence in different geography or countries might be alike. Since the nasolacrimal drainage system obstruction is a common problem in Thailand, knowledge of the incidence may disclose the burden of the disease that has never been reported. Objectives: Evaluate the incidence of acquired lacrimal drainage system obstruction (ALDO) in Thailand. Methods: This study was conducted in multi-centers. It was based on prospective and descriptive design. All patients with epiphoric symptoms visiting the outpatient departments of five tertiary eyecare centers were recruited between 2004 and 2007. Features of epiphoric symptoms and medical history were recorded, and complete ophthalmic examinations were performed. Results: Epiphoric patients were enrolled from all medical centers with 245 eligible patients, female:male ratio was 4.2:1. Ninety-nine patients (40%) had duration of epiphoric symptoms between one-five years. ALDO was found in 111 patients (45%) with female preponderance (6.9:1). Seventy-one patients (64%) had pre-sac obstruction and 40 patients (36%) had post-sac obstruction. Among other causes of epiphora, dry eye was the most common. Conclusion: The most common cause of epiphora was ALDO. The four-year incidence rate of ALDO among epiphoric patients was 45%.


2021 ◽  
Vol 2021 ◽  
pp. 1-5
Author(s):  
Abolfazl Kasaee ◽  
Bahram Eshraghi ◽  
Kambiz Ameli ◽  
Hossein Ghahvehchian ◽  
Mansooreh Jamshidian-Tehrani ◽  
...  

Purpose. To compare the success rate and complications of pulled versus pushed monocanalicular intubation in adults with incomplete lacrimal drainage system obstruction (lacrimal drainage system stenosis). Methods. Patients with lacrimal drainage system stenosis (Munk grade ≥3), including both nasolacrimal duct (NLD) stenosis and common canalicular stenosis, were recruited in this prospective comparative case series. Patients underwent probing and either Monoka (51 eyes) or Masterka (48 eyes) intubation under general or local anesthesia. Tubes were removed 4–14 weeks after the procedure. Six months after tube removal, Munk grades 0 and 1 were defined as a complete success, Munk grade 2 was defined as a partial success, and Munk grade ≥3 was defined as failure. All complications were recorded. Results. Ninety-nine eyes from 89 patients with lacrimal drainage system stenosis who underwent either Monoka (51 eyes) or Masterka (48 eyes) intubation were included. The mean (SD) age of the patients was 55.4 (12) years in the Monoka group and 53.5 (12.9) in the Masterka group. Groups were matched on demographics. Masterka intubation could not be performed in one eye. Complete and partial successes were observed in 52.9% (27/51) and 17.6% (9/51) of eyes in the Monoka group and 42.6% (20/47) and 12.8% (6/47) of eyes in the Masterka group, respectively ( p = 0.29 ). There was a trend toward a higher total success rate in patients with NLD stenosis treated with Monoka 66.7% (26/39) than Masterka 45.5% (15/33) intubation ( p = 0.07 ). This trend also existed in patients with common canalicular stenosis (83.3% (10/12) vs. 76.6% (11/14), p = 0.75 ). Age, sex, bilateral involvement, and duration of intubation did not have a significant impact on the success rate. Early tube loss, slit puncta, and temporary superficial punctate keratopathy were observed complications. Conclusion. Intubation with the pulled monocanalicular silicone tube was associated with a slightly but not significantly higher success rate in adults with lacrimal drainage system stenosis. Patients with NLD stenosis may achieve better results with pulled silicone tubes.


2019 ◽  
pp. 112067211989147
Author(s):  
Swati Singh ◽  
Abhimanyu Sharma ◽  
Vikas Mittal ◽  
Mohammad Javed Ali

Bilateral Tessier cleft types 3 and 4 are rare and commonly involve the lacrimal drainage system owing to their anatomical location. Such clefts commonly present with associated ocular anomalies and include colobomatous eyelids, hypertelorism, microphthalmia, punctal or canalicular agenesis, and nasolacrimal duct obstruction or exstrophy. The current report presents an 18-month-old baby with bilateral Tessier cleft 3 with a unilateral anophthalmos, symmetrical eyelid colobomas, and lacrimal drainage anomalies. The lacrimal anomalies noted include small lacrimal sac with inferior canaliculus on the right side and upper and lower punctal and canalicular agenesis on the left side. Computed tomographic dacryocystography demonstrated unilateral lacrimal sac and bilateral maldevelopment of the bony nasolacrimal duct.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document