Formulate a Clear M&A Strategy

Author(s):  
Timothy Galpin

Mergers and acquisitions are a strategic choice. Favorable regulatory environments, economic expansion, the emergence of new technologies, high stock prices, and liquidity in credit markets have all contributed to creating “waves” of M&A characterized by periods of high and low transaction volumes. M&A is a high-risk growth strategy, with ample evidence demonstrating that buyers struggle to capture value from their transactions. Yet, the Oxford M&A Insights Project found that almost two-thirds (64%) of respondents indicated that their company is “very likely” or “likely” to conduct future transactions. This chapter provides an overview of the strategic options for M&A and how firms develop their M&A strategies. The tools, templates, best practices, potential pitfalls, and a case example of how to go about setting a clear M&A strategy are also addressed, along with the main participants, core activities, buyer’s and seller’s perspectives, and key cross-border considerations.

2013 ◽  
Vol 10 (3) ◽  
pp. 8-29 ◽  
Author(s):  
Keisuke Chikamoto ◽  
Cheng Lu ◽  
Fumiko Takeda ◽  
Mariko Watanabe

We study the effect of mergers and acquisitions by Chinese acquirers of Japanese targets (China-Japan M&As) on the firm value. Using the data on China-Japan M&As in 1990-2009, we find that China- Japan M&As show a greater positive effect on stock prices for the targets than for the acquirers. We also observe the following tendencies: 1) the lower the management efficiency of the target is, the greater the market reactions are; 2) a bailout M&A generates greater market reactions for targets than does a non-bailout M&A; 3) capital participation imparts greater market reactions for the target than occur with other forms of M&A; and 4) targets experience smaller market reactions from the subsidiary sales than occur with other forms of M&A.


2007 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mary Russell ◽  
Annemarie Gockel ◽  
Barbara Harris
Keyword(s):  

Author(s):  
Alexandra V. Chugunova ◽  
Olga A. Klochko

This research studies the relationship of cross-border mergers and acquisitions to international trade through the lens of Russian pharmaceutical market. To this aim, the study analyses the woks of foreign economists dedicated to evaluating the link between foreign direct investment and international trade, and the influence of mergers and acquisitions on countries’ export and import flows. The research also presents a correlation analysis between the volume of Russian pharmaceutical exports and imports and cross-border deals performed by foreign pharmaceutical companies in Russia. We characterize these deals and conduct a comparative analysis of the regional structure of Russian pharmaceutical exports and imports as well as of the countries of origin of buyers in cross-border mergers and acquisitions. The results of the analysis indicate a positive relationship between cross-border mergers and acquisitions and Russian pharmaceutical exports, which is reflected in the export volume growth and its geographical diversification. However, it is outlined that particular problems of the industry hinder the amelioration of Russian positions in international exports. Similarly, the relationship between cross-border deals and Russian imports is positive: the major pharmaceutical products supply flow occurs from the countries of origin of buyers in cross-border mergers and acquisitions conducted in the Russian pharmaceutical sector.


Author(s):  
Yilmaz Akyüz

Recent years have also seen increased openness of EDEs to foreign direct investment (FDI) in search for faster growth and greater stability. However, FDI is one of the most ambiguous and least understood concepts in international economics. Common debate is confounded by several myths regarding its nature and impact. It is often portrayed as a stable, cross-border flow of capital that adds to productive capacity and meets foreign exchange shortfalls. However, the reality is far more complex. FDI does not always involve inflows of financial or real capital. Greenfield investment, unlike mergers and acquisitions, makes a direct contribution to productive capacity, but can crowd out domestic investors. FDI can induce significant instability in currency and financial markets. Its immediate contribution to balance-of-payments may be positive, but its longer-term impact is often negative because of high-profit remittances and import contents.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document