Further Exclusions

Author(s):  
Dominic Scott
Keyword(s):  

This chapter examines two more excluded groups, starting with the incontinent. As with the young, there is an apparent tension in the work, because in I 3 he states that argument will fail to benefit the incontinent (since they live by their feelings) and yet in VII 8 he says that, unlike intemperate people, they are open to persuasion, which I take to involve some sort of argument. I resolve the tension in the same way as the previous chapter, by distinguishing between analytical and rhetorical modes of argument. In the rest of the chapter I turn to Aristotle’s exclusion of the many even from rhetorical argument (X 9). I ask what justifies their exclusion and why Aristotle took a more severe line than Plato, who was still open to arguing with them in the Republic.

Author(s):  
Eliezer Geisler

What is the basic unit of knowledge? To answer this pesky query means to also reveal what is knowledge and perhaps even what is the structure of knowledge. In such a pursuit we should start with some definitions of types and forms of knowledge, so that we can possibly gain desired common ground. In the previous chapter I discussed the recent focus on propositions and language as descriptors of knowledge. These are active at the level of words, concepts, and even complex notions, such as “belief” and “justification.”


2020 ◽  
pp. 170-194
Author(s):  
Sue Llewellyn

The previous chapter argues that creative people are in a hybrid, disordered state in-between dreaming and wake. In this chapter I propose that if this in-between, de-differentiated state becomes more severe and enduring, psychiatric disorders will result. De-differentiation of wake and dreaming has two sides: dreaming suffuses wake and wake permeates dreaming. The idea that madness results from dreaming invading wake is of long standing. So is the notion that highly creative people are somewhat crazy. But the conception of a wake-like state pervading dreaming hasn’t been explored. Chaos theory delineates the dynamics of de-differentiation, disorder, and madness. Madness is defined as mistaking a complex non-obvious pattern in your experience for your experience.


Author(s):  
Lars Taxén

In this chapter, I take a step back from the whirling flow of events related in the previous chapter, and try to make sense of what happened during these years. In the first section, I analyze the evolution of the Framework using the vocabulary of the Actor Network Theory (ANT) (Latour, 1992). Next, I relate some observations from Ericsson outside the activities I was directly involved in; observations that somehow seemed to be in line with the pattern that began to emerge. Finally, I summarize the insights and needs from the practical trail.


Author(s):  
Joseph Kizza ◽  
Florence Migga Kizza

In Chapter I, we outlined the many causes of insecurity in the information communication technology (ICT) infrastructure. We indicated one particular weakness as users with little knowledge of the working of the communication infrastructure. In this chapter, we intend to address that concern. We give a very elementary treatment of the theory of networks and then outline the best network security solutions.


2005 ◽  
pp. 94-111
Author(s):  
Yi-chen Lan ◽  
Bhuvan Unhelkar

Enactment is the application of the theory of the Global Enterprise Transition (GET) process in practice. Thus, while the discussion up to the previous chapter in this book may be considered akin to a roadmap, the discussion here is more like actual driving on the road. Figure 4.1 explains the subtle differences between enactment and the earlier works an organization undertakes during the globalization process. In Figure 4.1, the “Consider GET” phase indicates that the organization is investigating and weighing various options, issues and factors in terms of globalization. These options and factors were considered in detail in Chapter I. As described earlier, this is the state when the organization realizes that irrespective of its current profitability and position in the market, globalization is becoming a serious part of its business strategy for survival and growth. Once the organization is satisfied and its stakeholders are convinced of the need to globalize, it then moves into the phase of “Planning and Documenting the GET process”as shown in Figure 4.1. During this phase, the organization is again applying the discussions undertaken so far in this book, particularly Chapters II and III, which encompass the vision, framework and technologies for global enterprise transitions. These visions and frameworks provide the backdrop for the planning and documentation activities that described the GETs. The organization may be considered in a strategic mode thus far. However, once the strategic aspect of the GET is consummated, the very practical phase of the process — the launching and management of the GET begins. These are the third and fourth states in which the organization finds itself, together called “Enactment,” as shown in Figure 4.1. With the commencement of this practical enactment phase of the GET, various additional and valuable activities like handling the “feedback” from the stakeholders in terms of the efficacy of the process of GET, mechanisms to manage the process in practice and approach to measuring the results of the GET, all come into play. It is this practical phase


Author(s):  
Guillaume Collett

Now, while we have established that in ultimately speaking the event speech genetically founds language, it is nonetheless ultimately language which expresses the event by retroactively framing speech. At the end of the previous chapter I started touching on the articulation between speech and language, but primarily from the side of speech; to examine this articulation in more depth and detail, it is necessary to now turn to Deleuze’s theory of language (or of the proposition), in relation to which, I will show, speech takes on the function of the verb. Furthermore, this articulation is a specifically phantasmatic framing of speech by language, and therefore also brings us to an analysis of the functioning of the psychoanalytic phantasm in the dynamic genesis. The phantasm is the culmination of the dynamic genesis or the structure it generates, as well as underpinning The Logic of Sense’s theory of the proposition, and finally it also dramatically opens onto the book’s ontological and literary themes which I will discuss in the following chapter. Indeed, it is through the phantasm that all these elements combine giving The Logic of Sense its topological continuity.


Author(s):  
Mikael Wiberg

The previous chapter provided us with a theory of the materiality of interaction. So, where do we go from here? Well, in order to move forward, I use this chapter to suggest that we might now need to look back in order to see the road ahead of us more clearly. In this chapter I therefore present how a focus on the materiality of interaction one the one hand leaves any distinctions between the physical and the digital behind, and how it on the other hand presents us with three distinct challenges as we move forward through the material turn.


Author(s):  
Rod Downey ◽  
Noam Greenberg

This chapter assesses m-topped degrees. The notion of m-topped degrees comes from a general study of the interaction between Turing reducibility and stronger reducibilities among c.e. sets. For example, this study includes the contiguous degrees. A c.e. Turing degree d is m-topped if it contains a greatest degree among the many one degrees of c.e. sets in d. Such degrees were constructed in Downey and Jockusch. The dynamics of the cascading phenomenon occurring in the construction of m-topped degrees strongly resemble the dynamics of the embedding of the 1–3–1 lattice in the c.e. degrees. Similar dynamics occurred in the original construction of a noncomputable left–c.e. real with only computable presentations, which was discussed in the previous chapter.


Author(s):  
Michael Rose

While sick in Oecussi I also reached out to Oecussi’s most famous Catholic ‘healer’, a man named Natar Nail Benu, known to all as Maun (Brother) Dan. Gently tolerant of (maybe even a little bemused by) my sinful nature, Maun Dan proved a sympathetic and patient friend, and took me under his wing, allowing me to spend time with him at his home and travel with him as he visited the many who called him in distress. In this chapter I explore how Maun Dan and his ‘Sacred Family’ move between meto and kase perspectives as they work to alleviate physical and emotional suffering in Oecussi in ways the central government is not able to facilitate.


2021 ◽  
pp. 309-313
Author(s):  
Elissa M. Redmiles

AbstractDigital technologies, the data they collect, and the ways in which that data is used increasingly effect our psychological, social, economic, medical, and safety-related well-being. While technology can be used to improve our well-being on all of these axes, it can also perpetrate harm. Prior research has focused near exclusively on privacy as a primary harm. Yet, privacy is only one of the many considerations that users have when adopting a technology. In this chapter, I use the case study of COVID-19 apps to argue that this reductionist view on technology harm has prevented effective adoption of beneficial technology. Further, a privacy-only focus risks perpetuating and magnifying existing technology-related inequities. To realize the potential of well-being technology, we need to create technologies that are respectful not only of user privacy but of users’ expectations for their technology use and the context in which that use takes place.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document