Conclusions: What Have We Learned?

Author(s):  
Jose Miguel Abito ◽  
David Besanko ◽  
Daniel Diermeier

This chapter summarizes each preceding chapter and then offers lessons for scholars and practitioners. Scholars should note the value of dynamic modeling in understanding interactions between activists and firms in the realm of private politics. Activists and firms can use the insights of the model to approach corporate campaigns more strategically. For example, for activists, the framework suggests that efforts aimed at hurting the reputations of firms can do more than serve an ideological aim at making companies look bad, or as a device to threaten harm. Activists can play the role of private regulators when effective public regulation is missing. For leaders of firms, the analysis highlights that corporate social responsibility and other initiatives can serve to enhance a firm’s reputation, but they can also be viewed as a form of risk management in the face of activist pressures that can potentially harm reputation.

2020 ◽  
Vol 1 (8) ◽  
pp. 72-79
Author(s):  
P. S. SHCHERBACHENKO ◽  
◽  
D. M. STOLBUN ◽  

The concept of corporate social responsibility is becoming more and more widespread and developing in Russia and abroad. The principles of socially responsible behavior act as an attribute of modern corporations more often. In the current realities, corporate social responsibility becomes more and more important as an obligatory component of the strategy of corporations, catering for their business reputation. In particular, the corporations’ business reputation constituted one of the most important components of their intangible assets. The article focuses on the impact of corporations’ socially responsible policies on their business reputation, as well as on their functioning and development on the market in general in the face of constantly increasing competition. The author provides a practical review of the influence of corporate social responsibility on the level of business reputation on the example of Gazprom, Sberbank and Tele2.


Author(s):  
Jonathon W. Moses ◽  
Bjørn Letnes

This chapter considers the role of international oil companies (IOCs) as global political actors with significant economic and political power. In doing so, we weigh the ethical costs and benefits for individuals, companies, and states alike. Using the concepts of “corporate social responsibility” (CSR) and “corporate citizenship” as points of departure, we consider the extent to which international oil companies have social and political responsibilities in the countries where they operate and what the host country can do to encourage this sort of behavior. We examine the nature of anticorruption legislation in several of the sending countries (including Norway), and look closely at how the Norwegian national oil company (NOC), Statoil, has navigated these ethical waters.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document