Breaking the surface

Author(s):  
Jan Zalasiewicz

The pebble is a small but perfectly integrated part of a metal factory. This factory has produced copper, silver, zinc, lead and gold (real gold, not its iron sulphide facsimile, pyrite). It is about 100 kilometres long and 60 kilometres across, by about 6 kilometres deep. It is called Wales. The metals have sustained, puzzled, frustrated, and finally abandoned many generations of Welsh miners. Many hundreds of generations, indeed, for these metals have been sought, avidly, since at least the Bronze Age, more than 3000 years ago, when shafts were dug through solid rock with little more than hand-held antler bone and rounded cobble. It is no small feat to chase the metal underground, for its path is tortuous, its presence capricious and its surroundings dangerous. The Welsh miners have been celebrated at home in literature and songs, and also in more surprising quarters, as in the Japanese filmmaker Hayao Miyazaki’s portrayal of them in Castle in the Sky (a children’s animé film, perhaps, but deeply serious at core, like everything that Miyazaki has done). So how is a country-sized metal factory created? Tiny fragments of the answer reside within the pebble. A streak of white crosses the pebble, cutting across both the strata and the tectonic cleavage surfaces. Cutting both these fabrics, it must then be younger. Such evidence of what-came-first and what-came-next is at the heart of geology, and has been so since the very beginnings of the science, since before geological time was pinned and measured by the application of atomic clocks and of fossil time-zonations. And for all today’s shiny atom-counting machines and well-stocked libraries and museums, this kind of logic is still the first thing the geologist applies when any new and unfamiliar problem comes into view. But what is it in the pebble that is younger? Peer with the hand lens, and the white streak is resolved as a mineral vein: that is, as a mass of tiny crystals that have grown within a fracture in the rock.

Author(s):  
Anne O'Connor

In 1930, Boswell made a compelling statement of his faith in the British Palaeolithic sequence as a reliable guide to geological time. The archaeologist Harold Peake (1867–1946), honorary curator of Newbury Museum whose interests ranged from earliest prehistory to the Bronze Age, had attended the same session at the annual meeting of the British Association for the Advancement of Science. He was provoked by Boswell’s conviction to offer a cautious warning: As a geologist he [Boswell] is sceptical of the possibility of solving the problem [of placing the East Anglian glacial deposits in sequence] by geological means, and turns to archaeological evidence as supplying more reliable data for the purpose. As an archaeologist I have similar doubts as to the efficacy of my own subject, though I am inclined to believe that the possibilities of the geological approach have been underrated. I would submit that the true succession of types of the Lower and Middle Palaeolithic phases, with which alone we are concerned, appears today to be by no means as certain as it did ten years ago. Broadly speaking we have evidence of successive stages of two industries, a core industry and a flake industry. Peake explained that some stages of the flake industry, which included ‘the types known as Levallois and LeMoustier and perhaps others’, seemed to have existed in Britain before the core industry went out of use. (‘Core’ industries were those like the Chellean and Acheulian: with hand-axes that were often made on nodules or ‘cores’ of flint.) This meant that ‘the simple succession, Early Chelles, Chelles, Evolved Chelles, St Acheul, and Le Moustier no longer holds good’. Early flake industries, like Warren’s Mesvinian from Clacton, had attracted more interest of late. By appearing alongside the hand-axe industries of the simple, standard sequence, they added greater variety to the character of stone tools that had existed at any one period of time, but they also reduced the chronological value of the old Palaeolithic sequence. Boswell, though he was absent from this meeting of 1930 (his paper had been read for him), learnt of Peake’s concern. He complained the following year: ‘If, as Mr. H. Peake has recently said, ‘‘. . . the simple succession Early Chelles, Chelles, Evolved Chelles, St Acheul, and Le Moustier no longer holds good,’’ I personally almost despair of a solution’.


1998 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-28
Author(s):  
John A Atkinson ◽  
Camilla Dickson ◽  
Jane Downes ◽  
Paul Robins ◽  
David Sanderson

Summary Two small burnt mounds were excavated as part of the programme to mitigate the impact of motorway construction in the Crawford area. The excavations followed a research strategy designed to address questions of date and function. This paper surveys the various competing theories about burnt mounds and how the archaeological evidence was evaluated against those theories. Both sites produced radiocarbon dates from the Bronze Age and evidence to suggest that they were cooking places. In addition, a short account is presented of two further burnt mounds discovered during the construction of the motorway in Annandale.


2003 ◽  
Vol 25 (2) ◽  
pp. 103-128
Author(s):  
Gavin Macgregor ◽  
Irene Cullen ◽  
Diane Alldritt ◽  
Michael Donnelly ◽  
Jennifer Miller ◽  
...  

Summary A programme of archaeological work was undertaken by Glasgow University Archaeological Research Division (GUARD) at West Flank Road, Drumchapel, in close proximity to the site of the prehistoric cemetery of Knappers. This paper considers the results of excavation of a range of negative features, including earlier Neolithic and Bronze Age pits and postholes. The earlier Neolithic features date to c. 3500–3000 BC and are interpreted as the partial remains of a subrectangular structure. The Bronze Age features may relate to ceremonial activities in the wider area. The significance of these remains is considered in relation to the site of Knappers and wider traditions during the fourth to second millennia BC.


2005 ◽  
Vol 27 (2) ◽  
pp. 193-195
Author(s):  
Brendan O'Connor
Keyword(s):  

2015 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sheila Grecian ◽  
Safwaan Adam ◽  
Akheel Syed
Keyword(s):  
Iron Age ◽  

2008 ◽  
Author(s):  
Manfred BIETAK ◽  
Ernst CZERNY
Keyword(s):  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document