A SIMPLE, VALID STEP TEST FOR ESTIMATING MAXIMAL OXYGEN UPTAKE IN EPIDEMIOLOGIC STUDIES1

1985 ◽  
Vol 121 (3) ◽  
pp. 382-390 ◽  
Author(s):  
STEVEN F. SICONOLFI ◽  
CAROL EWING GARBER ◽  
THOMAS M. LASATER ◽  
RICHARD A. CARLETON
2015 ◽  
Vol 36 (5) ◽  
pp. 401-406 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dominique Hansen ◽  
Nele Jacobs ◽  
Herbert Thijs ◽  
Paul Dendale ◽  
Neree Claes

2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
pp. 21-29
Author(s):  
Nguyen Thi Van Kieu ◽  
Su-Jin Jung ◽  
Sang-Wook Shin ◽  
Han-Wool Jung ◽  
Eun-Soo Jung ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 16 (2) ◽  
pp. 78-87
Author(s):  
J. M. Jäger ◽  
J. Kurz ◽  
H. Müller

AbstractMaximal oxygen uptake (VO2max) is one of the most distinguished parameters in endurance sports and plays an important role, for instance, in predicting endurance performance. Different models have been used to estimate VO2max or performance based on VO2max. These models can use linear or nonlinear approaches for modeling endurance performance. The aim of this study was to estimate VO2max in healthy adults based on the Queens College Step Test (QCST) as well as the Shuttle Run Test (SRT) and to use these values for linear and nonlinear models in order to predict the performance in a maximal 1000 m run (i.e. the speed in an incremental 4×1000 m Field Test (FT)). 53 female subjects participated in these three tests (QCST, SRT, FT). Maximal oxygen uptake values from QCST and SRT were used as (a) predictor variables in a multiple linear regression (MLR) model and as (b) input variables in a multilayer perceptron (MLP) after scaling in preprocessing. Model output was speed [km·h−1] in a maximal 1000 m run. Maximal oxygen uptake values estimated from QCST (40.8 ± 3.5 ml·kg−1·min−1) and SRT (46.7 ± 4.5 ml·kg−1·min−1) were significantly correlated (r = 0.38, p < 0.01) and maximal mean speed in the FT was 12.8 ± 1.6 km·h−1. Root mean squared error (RMSE) of the cross validated MLR model was 0.89 km·h−1while it was 0.95 km·h−1for MLP. Results showed that the accuracy of the applied MLP was comparable to the MLR, but did not outperform the linear approach.


2012 ◽  
Vol 20 (6) ◽  
pp. 1088-1094 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mette Aadahl ◽  
Morten Zacho ◽  
Allan Linneberg ◽  
Betina H Thuesen ◽  
Torben Jørgensen

2006 ◽  
Vol 1 (3) ◽  
pp. 246-260 ◽  
Author(s):  
Darrell L. Bonetti ◽  
Will G. Hopkins ◽  
Andrew E. Kilding

Context:Live-high train-low altitude training produces worthwhile gains in performance for endurance athletes, but the benefits of adaptation to various forms of artificial altitude are less clear.Purpose:To quantify the effects of intermittent hypoxic exposure on kayak performance.Methods:In a crossover design with a 6-week washout, we randomized 10 subelite male sprint kayak paddlers to hypoxia or control groups for 3 weeks (5 days/week) of intermittent hypoxic exposure using a nitrogen-filtration device. Each day's exposure consisted of alternately breathing hypoxic and ambient air for 5 minutes each over 1 hour. Performance tests were an incremental step test to estimate peak power, maximal oxygen uptake, exercise economy, and lactate threshold; a 500-m time trial; and 5 × 100-m sprints. All tests were performed on a wind-braked kayak ergometer 7 and 3 days pretreatment and 3 and 10 days post treatment. Hemoglobin concentration was measured at 1 day pretreatment, 5 and 10 days during treatment, and 3 days after treatment.Results:Relative to control, at 3 days post treatment the hypoxia group showed the following increases: peak power 6.8% (90% confidence limits, ± 5.2%), mean repeat sprint power 8.3% (± 6.7%), and hemoglobin concentration 3.6% (± 3.2%). Changes in lactate threshold, mean 500-m power, maximal oxygen uptake, and exercise economy were unclear. Large effects for peak power and mean sprint speed were still present 10 days posthypoxia.Conclusion:These effects of intermittent hypoxic exposure should enhance performance in kayak racing. The effects might be mediated via changes in oxygen transport.


1966 ◽  
Vol 21 (4) ◽  
pp. 1387-1388 ◽  
Author(s):  
F W Kasch ◽  
W H Phillips ◽  
W D Ross ◽  
J E Carter ◽  
J L Boyer

1961 ◽  
Vol 16 (1) ◽  
pp. 153-156 ◽  
Author(s):  
Theodor Hettinger ◽  
Newton C. Birkhead ◽  
Steven M. Horvath ◽  
Bela Issekutz ◽  
Kaare Rodahl

Maximal oxygen uptakes were compared with the results from five different tests of physical work capacity in 96 men, 23–62 years of age. In addition, the 'predicted' maximal oxygen uptakes, according to the Ǻstrand-Ryhming nomogram, were compared with the actual measured maximal oxygen uptakes in the 28 subjects who were between 20 and 30 years of age. There was a statistically significant correlation between the maximal oxygen uptake and the following tests: the Harvard step test (P < .001); a new modified step test in which adjustments were made for the body weight and the length of the legs of the subject (P < .001); the Master step test (P < .05); and the Amplituden-Puls-Frequenz test, (P < .02). There was no statistically significant correlation between the maximal oxygen uptake and the Leistungs-Pulsindex. The correlation between the predicted maximal oxygen uptake and the measured maximal oxygen uptake was statistically significant at the .01 level. Submitted on May 16, 1960


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document