scholarly journals 140. PATIENT SATISFACTION WITH PARTICIPATION IN CLINICAL TRIALS IN A NATIONAL HEALTH SERVICE SETTING

Rheumatology ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 56 (suppl_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Izolda Biro ◽  
Simon Donnelly ◽  
Carey Tierney ◽  
Hasan Tahir ◽  
Judith Bubbear
Lung Cancer ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 81 (2) ◽  
pp. 236-240 ◽  
Author(s):  
Francesco Grossi ◽  
Carlo Genova ◽  
Nidia Diaz Gaitan ◽  
Maria Giovanna Dal Bello ◽  
Erika Rijavec ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 103 (4) ◽  
pp. 539-543 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kerr Brogan ◽  
Charles J M Diaper ◽  
Alan P Rotchford

Background/aimsTo report refractive outcomes from an National Health Service (NHS) cataract surgery service and assess if results meet suggested benchmark standard.MethodsDetails of all patients undergoing cataract surgery in the Southern General and New Victoria hospitals in Glasgow, UK, between November 2006 and December 2016 were prospectively entered into an electronic database. Patients were reviewed 4 weeks postoperatively in the eye clinic and underwent refraction at their local optometrist prior to this appointment. Surgically uncomplicated cases with in the bag’ non-toric intraocular lens implantation were included. Patients with previous laser refractive procedures or failing to achieve 6/12 acuity or better postoperatively were excluded. Proximity to targeted postoperative refraction was documented.ResultsOver this 10-year period, 11 083 eyes underwent cataract surgery. Of these, 8943 eyes of 6936 patients (80.69%) met the inclusion criteria and had both target and postoperative outcome refraction recorded. The mean difference between the targeted and outcome refraction was −0.07 D (SD 0.67). The mean absolute error was 0.50 D. Postoperative refraction was within 1 D of target refraction for 7938 eyes (88.76%) and within 0.50 D for 5577 eyes (62.36%).ConclusionRefractive outcomes following routine cataract surgery reported here are well within the targets recommended by the Royal College of Ophthalmologists and European guidelines, but suggest that higher cataract refractive outcome benchmark standards may not yet be a realistic expectation for all NHS units with current biometry practice.


2016 ◽  
Vol 10 (2) ◽  
pp. 145-147 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jessica Whitburn ◽  
Surjeet Singh ◽  
Prasanna Sooriakumaran

Starting and conducting clinical trials in England can be a complicated and time-consuming process. Before your study can begin it is necessary to gain approval from the appropriate regulatory bodies. Prior to March 2016, studies required National Health Service (NHS) permission (also referred to as Research and Development (R&D) approval) obtained via the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Coordinated System for gaining NHS Permission (CSP). Since March 2016, a new streamlined system has been introduced with the aim of making it easier to gain regulatory approvals. Now studies must go through the process of Health Research Authority (HRA) approval. In this article we review the process of gaining HRA approval in England. The article is aimed at junior researchers to help them understand the application process, and to give tips on how to succeed in gaining approval.


2018 ◽  
Vol 44 (3) ◽  
pp. 290-295 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paul Stirling ◽  
Paul J. Jenkins ◽  
Nicholas D. Clement ◽  
Andrew D. Duckworth ◽  
Jane E. McEachan

The Friends and Family Test, a variant of the Net Promoter Score, was adapted for the National Health Service to evaluate overall patient satisfaction and how likely patients are to recommend an intervention. It ranges from −100 to 100. Positive scores indicate good performance. This study quantifies the scores in 810 patients at a mean of 14 months following four common procedures. The score was 83 for trigger finger release ( n = 103), 68 for carpal tunnel decompression ( n = 467), 62 for surgery for Dupuytren’s disease ( n = 224) and 44 for ganglia excision ( n = 16). Our study indicates that these procedures are highly valued and are recommended by patients according to the Friends and Family Test. The results of the Friends and Family Test correlated well with postoperative functional improvement and satisfaction. We conclude from this study that a compound score based on the Friends and Family Test is a useful addition to traditional measures of patient satisfaction. Level of evidence: II


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document