scholarly journals 211. PROGRESSIVE RESISTANCE TRAINING IMPROVES FUNCTION IN EARLY AND ESTABLISHED INFLAMMATORY ARTHRITIS: EXPERIENCE FROM A DISTRICT GENERAL HOSPITAL

Rheumatology ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 56 (suppl_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Klara Morsley ◽  
Berna Berntzen ◽  
Lisa Erwood ◽  
Toby Bellerby ◽  
Lyn Williamson
Rheumatology ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 59 (Supplement_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Jade Skeates ◽  
Jennifer Pearson ◽  
Sandi Derham ◽  
Shea Palmer

Abstract Background Inflammatory arthritis [IA] has adverse effects on strength, function, fatigue and well-being. Guidelines recommend people with IA should exercise to improve strength and cardiovascular fitness. In 2015, our Rheumatology Physiotherapy Team introduced an evidence-based Progressive Resistance Training Programme [PRTP] for people with IA. This research aimed to evaluate its effectiveness within a United Kingdom National Health Service [NHS] setting. Methods A pre- to post-treatment evaluation was conducted. People with IA attending Rheumatology Physiotherapy were offered the supervised PRTP (1-hour x 10 weeks), performing 7 resistance exercises each session (70-80% 1RM, 3 x 8-12 reps). Pre- and post-treatment outcomes included Health Assessment Questionnaire [HAQ], EQ5D-5L, Self-Efficacy (SARAH Trial), 30 second Sit-to-Stand [STS], FACIT-F (fatigue scale) and Grip Strength. Changes in outcomes were analysed using Paired Samples t-tests and standardised mean difference (SMD) were calculated. Results 201 patients commenced the programme between May 2015 and April 2019, with 121 participants completing it. Diagnoses included Rheumatoid Arthritis (n = 149), Psoriatic Arthritis (n = 42), Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis (n = 5), Enteropathic IA (n = 2), Oligoarthritis (n = 1), Reactive Arthritis (n = 1) and Undifferentiated IA (n = 1). Age = mean 56.8 ± SD 14.8 years; number of sessions attended = 7.7 ± 3.4. There were no differences between participants not completing (n = 54; 72% women; age 55.0 ± 14.6 years; HAQ 0.99 ± 0.70) versus those completing the PRTP (n = 147; 78% women; age 57.5 ± 14.8 years; HAQ 0.86 ± 0.65). A pragmatic decision was made to analyse all available data for each outcome. Conclusion All outcome measures demonstrated statistically significant improvements. Notably, minimal clinically important differences were achieved in STS and FACIT-F. STS correlates to lower limb power, balance and endurance, and is a predictor of falls. Fatigue significantly impacts function in people with IA, often limiting confidence and willingness to participate in exercise activities. Effective evidence based PRTPs for people with IAs can be delivered in an NHS service. Improvements in function, wellbeing, self-efficacy, strength and fatigue are achievable, however, exploration of the clinical relevance of these observed changes is recommended. Further research exploring patients’ perspectives of the PRTP and adherence to long-term exercise is needed. Disclosures J. Skeates: None. J. Pearson: None. S. Derham: None. S. Palmer: None.


2019 ◽  
Vol 31 (4) ◽  
pp. 416-424 ◽  
Author(s):  
Simona Bar-Haim ◽  
Ronit Aviram ◽  
Anat Shkedy Rabani ◽  
Akram Amro ◽  
Ibtisam Nammourah ◽  
...  

Purpose:Exercise interventions have been shown to increase motor capacities in adolescents with cerebral palsy; however, how they affect habitual physical activity (HPA) and sedentary behavior is unclear. The main objective was to correlate changes in HPA with changes in mobility capacity following exercise interventions.Methods:A total of 54 participants (aged 12–20 y) with bilateral spastic cerebral palsy at Gross Motor Function Classification System (GMFCS) levels II and III received 4 months of group progressive resistance training or treadmill training. Mobility measurements and HPA (averaged over 96 h) were made before and after interventions.Results:Averaged baseline mobility and HPA measures and improvements in each after both interventions were positively correlated in all participants. Percentage of sedentary/awake time decreased 2%, with significant increases in HPA measures of step count (16%), walk time (14%), and upright time (9%). Mobility measures and HPA changes were quite similar between Gross Motor Function Classification System levels, but improvement in HPA after group progressive resistance training was greater than after treadmill training (12% vs 4%) and correlated with mobility improvement.Conclusions:Mobility capacity improved after these interventions and was clearly associated with improved HPA. The group progressive resistance training intervention seems preferable to improve HPA, perhaps related to greater social interaction and motivation provided by group training.


1999 ◽  
Vol 9 (6) ◽  
pp. 379-384 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eline Lindeman ◽  
Frank Spaans ◽  
Jos Reulen ◽  
Pieter Leffers ◽  
Jan Drukker

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document