DNA Double Strand Breaks from Two Single Strand Breaks and Cell Cycle Radiation Sensitivity

1994 ◽  
Vol 52 (1-4) ◽  
pp. 363-366
Author(s):  
K.H. Chadwick ◽  
H.P. Leenhouts
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Radiation Sensitivity ◽  
Double Strand Breaks ◽  
Single Strand ◽  
Dna Double Strand Breaks ◽  
Strand Breaks ◽  
Single Strand Breaks

Change in DNA after Exposure to Hydrogen Atoms.

1969 ◽  
Vol 24 (12) ◽  
pp. 1565-1573 ◽  
Author(s):  
H. Jung, ◽  
U. Hagen, ◽  
M. Ullrich, ◽  
E. E. Petersen
Keyword(s):  
Hydrogen Bonds ◽  
Double Strand Breaks ◽  
Single Strand ◽  
Dna Double Strand Breaks ◽  
Hydrogen Atoms ◽  
Γ Irradiation ◽  
Base Damage ◽  
Strand Breaks ◽  
Single Strand Breaks ◽  
Single Breaks

The action of hydrogen atoms — generated in an electrodeless high frequency gas discharge — on calf thymus DNA in aqueous solution was investigated. The loss of priming activity was compared with the appearance of single strand breaks in native and denatured DNA, double strand breaks, denatured zones, base damage and rupture of hydrogen bonds. The primary lesions after exposure to H atoms and gamma radiation, respectively, are single strand breaks and base damage. Double strand breaks originating from accumulation of single breaks, and rupture of hydrogen bonds caused by single breaks and base damage, were identified as secondary lesions. In relation to strand breaks arising from radical attack on the sugar-phosphate backbone of the DNA molecule, base damage is about 12.5 times more frequent after Η-exposure than after γ-irradiation. It is concluded from this observation, that single strand breaks are the predominant critical lesions responsible for the loss of the functional activity of DNA.

Delayed repletion of O6-methylguanine—DNA methyltransferase resulting in failure to protect the human glioblastoma cell line SF767 from temozolomide-induced cytotoxicity

2003 ◽  
Vol 98 (3) ◽  
pp. 591-598 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yuichi Hirose ◽  
Emiko L. Kreklau ◽  
Leonard C. Erickson ◽  
Mitchel S. Berger ◽  
Russell O. Pieper
Keyword(s):  
Cell Death ◽  
Dna Methyltransferase ◽  
Glioma Cells ◽  
Double Strand Breaks ◽  
Single Strand ◽  
Dna Double Strand Breaks ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Strand Breaks ◽  
Single Strand Breaks ◽  
Fine Print

Object. Temozolomide (TMZ)-induced O6-methylguanine (MG) DNA lesions, if not removed by MG—DNA methyltransferase (MGMT), mispair with thymine, trigger rounds of futile mismatch repair (MMR), and in glioma cells lead to prolonged G2—M arrest and ultimately cell death. Depletion of MGMT by O6-benzylguanine (BG) sensitizes tumor cells to TMZ, and this combination is currently used in clinical trials. The use of the TMZ+BG combination in gliomas, however, is complicated by the prolonged TMZ-induced G2—M arrest, which may delay activation of poorly defined cell death pathways and allow for MGMT repletion and reversal of toxicity. Methods. To address these issues, the actions of TMZ were monitored in DNA MMR-proficient SF767 glioma cells depleted of MGMT by BG, and in cells in which BG was removed at various times after TMZ exposure. In MGMT-depleted cells, TMZ exposure led to DNA single-strand breaks and phosphorylation of cdc2, followed by G2—M arrest, induction of p53/p21, and DNA double-strand breaks. Although DNA single-strand breaks, phosphorylation of cdc2, and G2—M arrest could be reversed by repletion of MGMT up to 5 days after TMZ exposure, TMZ-induced cytotoxicity could only be prevented if MGMT was replenished within 24 hours of the onset of G2—M arrest, and before the creation of DNA double-strand breaks. Conclusions. These results indicate that although SF767 glioma cells undergo a prolonged G2—M arrest in response to TMZ, their ability to escape TMZ-induced cytotoxicity by MGMT repletion is limited to an approximately 24-hour period after the onset of G2—M arrest.

Repair pathway choice for double-strand breaks

2020 ◽  
Vol 64 (5) ◽  
pp. 765-777 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yixi Xu ◽  
Dongyi Xu
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Double Strand Breaks ◽  
Homologous Region ◽  
Gene Repair ◽  
Repair Pathway ◽  
Dna Double Strand Breaks ◽  
Environmental Radiation ◽  
Strand Breaks ◽  
Dna End Resection ◽  
End Resection

Abstract Deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) is at a constant risk of damage from endogenous substances, environmental radiation, and chemical stressors. DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) pose a significant threat to genomic integrity and cell survival. There are two major pathways for DSB repair: nonhomologous end-joining (NHEJ) and homologous recombination (HR). The extent of DNA end resection, which determines the length of the 3′ single-stranded DNA (ssDNA) overhang, is the primary factor that determines whether repair is carried out via NHEJ or HR. NHEJ, which does not require a 3′ ssDNA tail, occurs throughout the cell cycle. 53BP1 and the cofactors PTIP or RIF1-shieldin protect the broken DNA end, inhibit long-range end resection and thus promote NHEJ. In contrast, HR mainly occurs during the S/G2 phase and requires DNA end processing to create a 3′ tail that can invade a homologous region, ensuring faithful gene repair. BRCA1 and the cofactors CtIP, EXO1, BLM/DNA2, and the MRE11–RAD50–NBS1 (MRN) complex promote DNA end resection and thus HR. DNA resection is influenced by the cell cycle, the chromatin environment, and the complexity of the DNA end break. Herein, we summarize the key factors involved in repair pathway selection for DSBs and discuss recent related publications.

scholarly journals DNA DAMAGE AND REPAIR IN EUKARYOTIC CELLS

Genetics ◽  
1974 ◽  
Vol 78 (1) ◽  
pp. 139-148
Author(s):  
R B Painter
Keyword(s):  
Ionizing Radiation ◽  
Excision Repair ◽  
Double Strand Breaks ◽  
Single Strand ◽  
Premature Aging ◽  
Cross Linking ◽  
Base Damage ◽  
Strand Breaks ◽  
Single Strand Breaks ◽  
Post Replication Repair

ABSTRACT Damage in DNA after irradiation can be classified into five kinds: base damage, single-strand breaks, double-strand breaks, DNA-DNA cross-linking, and DNA-protein cross-linking. Of these, repair of base damage is the best understood. In eukaryotes, at least three repair systems are known that can deal with base damage: photoreactivation, excision repair, and post-replication repair. Photoreactivation is specific for UV-induced damage and occurs widely throughout the biosphere, although it seems to be absent from placental mammals. Excision repair is present in prokaryotes and in animals but does not seem to be present in plants. Post-replication repair is poorly understood. Recent reports indicate that growing points in mammalian DNA simply skip past UV-induced lesions, leaving gaps in newly made DNA that are subsequently filled in by de novo synthesis. Evidence that this concept is oversimplified or incorrect is presented.—Single-strand breaks are induced by ionizing radiation but most cells can rapidly repair most or all of them, even after supralethal doses. The chemistry of the fragments formed when breaks are induced by ionizing radiation is complex and poorly understood. Therefore, the intermediate steps in the repair of single-strand breaks are unknown. Double-strand breaks and the two kinds of cross-linking have been studied very little and almost nothing is known about their mechanisms for repair.—The role of mammalian DNA repair in mutations is not known. Although there is evidence that defective repair can lead to cancer and/or premature aging in humans, the relationship between the molecular defects and the diseased state remains obscure.

scholarly journals SisterC: A novel 3C-technique to detect chromatin interactions between and along sister chromatids

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marlies E. Oomen ◽  
Adam K. Hedger ◽  
Jonathan K. Watts ◽  
Job Dekker
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Single Strand ◽  
Chromosome Conformation Capture ◽  
Brdu Incorporation ◽  
Chromosome Conformation ◽  
Strand Breaks ◽  
Chromatin Interactions ◽  
Sister Chromatids ◽  
Single Strand Breaks ◽  
Capture Techniques

Abstract Current chromosome conformation capture techniques are not able to distinguish sister chromatids. Here we describe the protocol of SisterC1: a novel Hi-C technique that leverages BrdU incorporation and UV/Hoechst-induced single strand breaks to identify interactions along and between sister chromatids. By synchronizing cells, BrdU is incorporated only on the newly replicated strand, which distinguishes the two sister chromatids2,3. This is followed by Hi-C4 of cells that can be arrested in different stages of the cell cycle, e.g. in mitosis. Before final amplification of the Hi-C library, strands containing BrdU are specifically depleted by UV/Hoechst treatment. SisterC libraries are then sequenced using 50bp paired end reads, followed by mapping using standard Hi-C processing tools. Interactions can then be assigned as inter- or intra-sister interactions based on read orientation.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document