scholarly journals 0704 Treatment-emergent Central Sleep Apnea Predicts Residual Respiratory Instability During Cpap Use At 6 Months

SLEEP ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 43 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. A268-A268
Author(s):  
R J Thomas

Abstract Introduction The prevalence, severity, significance, and predictors of residual sleep apnea during use of continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) remain uncertain. High loop gain is associated with or induces periodic breathing and central sleep apnea (CSA). Treatment-emergent CSA (TE-CSA) is often considered a transient phenomenon of no long-term clinical significance. Standard polysomnographic features were assessed as risk factors for high residual apnea during compliant CPAP use. Methods Patients with sleep apnea (mean AHI 53.6, SD:33/hour of sleep) who underwent split night studies were prospectively entered in a database. They were all treated with positive airway pressure at the Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center (Boston) and tracked by the EncoreAnywhere system. Machine detected AHI (AHIm) was extracted for a week average at month 6. The manual scored AHI(AHIs) was calculated from the last waveform graph during every month. Logistic regression assessed predictors of elevated automated (5 or greater) or manual (10 or greater) residual events//hour of use. Results A total of 69 CPAP compliant (average of at least 4 hours) subjects were analyzed. Age: 59.5 (range 17-81), gender: 47/69 male. 44/69 had an elevated manual AHI, while 20/69 had an elevated autodetected AHI. The only predictors of high residual apnea were TE-CSA (5 or more central apneas and hypopneas/hour of sleep): Odds Ratio 3.6 (CI: 1.07-12-3), p: 0.39. and the treatment component arousal index: Odds Ratio 1.06 (CI: 1.01-1.11), p: 0.018. Machine estimated AHI, which under-detected events by a factor of 3 or more, was not associated with any measure. Conclusion Residual apnea is common after 6 months of compliant CPAP use, and the only predictors identified were TE-CSA and treatment component arousal index. Support This study is supported by American Academy of Sleep Medicine Foundation, Category-I award to RJT

2014 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
pp. 57 ◽  
Author(s):  
Roopika Reddy, MD ◽  
David Adamo, RPSGT ◽  
Thomas Kufel, MD ◽  
Jahan Porhomayon, MD ◽  
Ali A. El-Solh, MD, MPH

Objective: To systematically review the various modalities of positive airway pressure (PAP) in the treatment of opioid-related central sleep apnea (CSA).Design: Systematic review.Interventions: MEDLINE, the Cochrane Library, and EMBASE were screened through March 2013 to identify articles which investigated treatment of opioid-related CSA with PAP. Eligible articles were identified in a staged process and were assessed by two investigators independently. The methodological quality of the reporting of eligible articles was assessed using a set of questions addressing both general and statistical methodologies.Results: Five articles met the inclusion criteria for a total of 127 patients. All patients had been on opioids for at least 6 months. The dose ranged from 10 mg to 450 mg daily of morphine equivalent dose. Continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) was proven mostly ineffective in reducing central apneic events. Bilevel positive airway pressure (BiPAP) with and without supplemental oxygen achieved elimination of central apneas in 62 percent of patients. Adaptive servo ventilation (ASV) yielded conflicting results with 58 percent of participants attaining a central apnea index <10 per hour. The presence of ataxic breathing predicted poor response to PAP.Conclusions: The available evidence on the efficacy of PAP in opioid-related CSA is inconclusive. With the increasing use of opioids, further studies are needed to assess optimal PAP therapy and predictors of success in this group of patients.


F1000Research ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 8 ◽  
pp. 981 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jerome A. Dempsey

Central sleep apnea is prevalent in patients with heart failure, healthy individuals at high altitudes, and chronic opiate users and in the initiation of “mixed” (that is, central plus obstructive apneas). This brief review focuses on (a) the causes of repetitive, cyclical central apneas as mediated primarily through enhanced sensitivities in the respiratory control system and (b) treatment of central sleep apnea through modification of key components of neurochemical control as opposed to the current universal use of positive airway pressure.


2016 ◽  
Vol Volume 8 ◽  
pp. 259-266 ◽  
Author(s):  
Matt Bianchi ◽  
Karen Gannon ◽  
Kathy Lovell ◽  
Margaret Merlino ◽  
James Mojica ◽  
...  

SLEEP ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 43 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. A474-A474
Author(s):  
Nishant Chaudhary ◽  
Mirna Ayache ◽  
John Carter

Abstract Introduction Positive airway pressure-induced upper airway obstruction has been reported with the treatment of obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) using continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) along with an oronasal interface. Here we describe a case of persistent treatment emergent central sleep apnea (TECSA) inadequately treated with adaptive servo ventilation (ASV), with an airflow pattern suggestive of ASV-induced upper airway obstruction. Report of Case A 32-year-old male, with severe OSA (apnea hypopnea index: 52.4) and no other significant past medical history, was treated with CPAP and required higher pressures during titration sleep studies to alleviate obstructive events, despite a Mallampati Class II airway and a normal body mass index. Drug-Induced Sleep Endoscopy (DISE) showed a complete velopharynx and oropharynx anterior posterior (AP) collapse, long soft palate, which improved with neck extension. CPAP therapy, however, did not result in any symptomatic benefit and compliance reports revealed high residual AHI and persistent TECSA. He underwent an ASV titration sleep study up to a final setting of expiratory positive airway pressure 9 cm H2O, pressure support 6-15 cm H2O (auto-rate), with a full-face mask due to high oral leak associated with the nasal interface. The ASV device detected central apneas and provided mandatory breaths, but did not capture the thorax or abdomen, despite normal mask pressure tracings. Several such apneas occurred, with significant oxyhemoglobin desaturation. Conclusion We postulate that the ASV failure to correct central sleep apnea as evidenced by the absence of thoracoabdominal inspiratory effort, occurred due to ASV-induced upper airway obstruction. Further treatment options for this ASV phenomenon are to pursue an ASV-assisted DISE and determine the effectiveness of adjunctive therapy including neck extension, nasal mask with a mouth closing device and a mandibular assist device.


2019 ◽  
Vol 15 (10) ◽  
pp. 1459-1468 ◽  
Author(s):  
Narat Srivali ◽  
Anwar C. Chahal ◽  
Meghna P. Mansukhani ◽  
Jay Mandrekar ◽  
Virend K. Somers ◽  
...  

Circulation ◽  
2007 ◽  
Vol 115 (25) ◽  
pp. 3173-3180 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael Arzt ◽  
John S. Floras ◽  
Alexander G. Logan ◽  
R. John Kimoff ◽  
Frederic Series ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document