scholarly journals P001 Safety, tolerability, and efficacy of 1 month of atomoxetine plus oxybutynin in obstructive sleep apnoea

2021 ◽  
Vol 2 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. A22-A22
Author(s):  
A Aishah ◽  
K Loffler ◽  
B Tonson ◽  
S Mukherjee ◽  
R Adams ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Obstructive Sleep Apnoea ◽  
Side Effect ◽  
Vital Signs ◽  
Upper Airway ◽  
Sleep Apnoea ◽  
Side Effect Profile ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Phone Calls ◽  
Obstructive Sleep ◽  
Single Night

Abstract Introduction Single-night studies with noradrenergic and anti-muscarinics have recently been shown to improve upper-airway function and reduce obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA) severity. This study aimed to determine the safety, tolerability, and efficacy profile of longer-term use of different doses of the noradrenergic agent atomoxetine combined with the anti-muscarinic oxybutynin (ato-oxy) in people with OSA. Methods Thirty-nine people with predominantly severe OSA received either 80/5mg ato-oxy, 40/5mg ato-oxy, 40/2.5mg ato-oxy or placebo nightly for 30 days according to a double-blind, randomised, parallel design. Safety and tolerability were assessed via weekly phone calls for adverse events, vital signs and objective measures of alertness and memory. Participants completed 3 in-laboratory sleep studies (baseline, night 1 and night 30) to assess efficacy. Results Side effects were generally mild and consistent with the known side-effect profile of each drug alone (e.g. dose-dependent increases in dry mouth with oxybutynin). Heart rate increased by night 30 in two of the drug arms versus placebo (e.g. 80/5mg ~9 beats/min, p=0.01). Blood pressure and measures of alertness and memory did not change between conditions. AHI4 and hypoxic burden decreased by ~50% in the 80/5mg arm on night 1 with similar magnitude reductions at night 30. ~50% of participants indicated willingness to continue taking the medication post-study. Discussion 1 month of nightly noradrenergic and anti-muscarinic combination therapy is generally well-tolerated with a side effect profile consistent with each agent alone. These findings also further highlight the potential to target noradrenergic and anti-muscarinic mechanisms for OSA pharmacotherapy development.

scholarly journals Role of common hypnotics on the phenotypic causes of obstructive sleep apnoea: paradoxical effects of zolpidem

2017 ◽  
Vol 50 (6) ◽  
pp. 1701344 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jayne C. Carberry ◽  
Lauren P. Fisher ◽  
Ronald R. Grunstein ◽  
Simon C. Gandevia ◽  
David K. McKenzie ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Obstructive Sleep Apnoea ◽  
Muscle Activity ◽  
Upper Airway ◽  
Sleep Apnoea ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Genioglossus Muscle ◽  
Airway Narrowing ◽  
Arousal Threshold ◽  
Obstructive Sleep ◽  
Airway Collapsibility

Hypnotics are contraindicated in obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA) because of concerns of pharyngeal muscle relaxation and delayed arousal worsening hypoxaemia. However, human data are lacking. This study aimed to determine the effects of three common hypnotics on the respiratory arousal threshold, genioglossus muscle responsiveness and upper airway collapsibility during sleep.21 individuals with and without OSA (18–65 years) completed 84 detailed sleep studies after receiving temazepam (10 mg), zolpidem (10 mg), zopiclone (7.5 mg) and placebo on four occasions in a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover trial (ACTRN12612001004853).The arousal threshold increased with zolpidem and zopicloneversusplacebo (mean±sd−18.3±10 and −19.1±9versus−14.6±7 cmH2O; p=0.02 and p<0.001) but not with temazepam (−16.8±9 cmH2O; p=0.17). Genioglossus muscle activity during stable non-REM sleep and responsiveness during airway narrowing was not different with temazepam and zopicloneversusplacebo but, paradoxically, zolpidem increased median muscle responsiveness three-fold during airway narrowing (median −0.15 (interquartile range −1.01 to −0.04)versus−0.05 (−0.29 to −0.03)% maximum EMG per cmH2O epiglottic pressure; p=0.03). The upper airway critical closing pressure did not change with any of the hypnotics.These doses of common hypnotics have differential effects on the respiratory arousal threshold but do not reduce upper airway muscle activity or alter airway collapsibility during sleep. Rather, muscle activity increases during airway narrowing with zolpidem.

scholarly journals Effect of 1 month of zopiclone on obstructive sleep apnoea severity and symptoms: a randomised controlled trial

2018 ◽  
Vol 52 (1) ◽  
pp. 1800149 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sophie G. Carter ◽  
Jayne C. Carberry ◽  
Garry Cho ◽  
Lauren P. Fisher ◽  
Charlotte M. Rollo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Obstructive Sleep Apnoea ◽  
Driving Simulator ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Safety Data ◽  
Clinical Trial Data ◽  
Sleep Apnoea ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Obstructive Sleep ◽  
Single Night ◽  
Randomised Controlled

Hypnotic use in obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA) is contraindicated due to safety concerns. Recent studies indicate that single-night hypnotic use worsens hypoxaemia in some and reduces OSA severity in others depending on differences in pathophysiology. However, longer clinical trial data are lacking. This study aimed to determine the effects of 1 month of zopiclone on OSA severity, sleepiness and alertness in patients with low–moderate respiratory arousal thresholds without major overnight hypoxaemia.69 participants completed a physiology screening night with an epiglottic catheter to quantify arousal threshold. 30 eligible patients (apnoea–hypopnoea index (AHI) 22±11 events·h−1) then completed standard in-laboratory polysomnography (baseline) and returned for two additional overnight sleep studies (nights 1 and 30) after receiving either nightly zopiclone (7.5 mg) or placebo during a 1-month, double-blind, randomised, parallel trial (ANZCTRidentifier ANZCTRN12613001106729).The change in AHI from baseline to night 30 was not different between zopicloneversusplacebo groups (−5.9±10.2versus−2.4±5.5 events·h−1; p=0.24). Similarly, hypoxaemia, next-day sleepiness and driving simulator performance were not different.1 month of zopiclone does not worsen OSA severity, sleepiness or alertness in selected patients without major overnight hypoxaemia. As the first study to assess the effect of a hypnotic on OSA severity and sleepiness beyond single-night studies, these findings provide important safety data and insight into OSA pathophysiology.

scholarly journals Desipramine improves upper airway collapsibility and reduces OSA severity in patients with minimal muscle compensation

2016 ◽  
Vol 48 (5) ◽  
pp. 1340-1350 ◽  
Author(s):  
Luigi Taranto-Montemurro ◽  
Scott A. Sands ◽  
Bradley A. Edwards ◽  
Ali Azarbarzin ◽  
Melania Marques ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Crossover Trial ◽  
Positive Airway Pressure ◽  
Upper Airway ◽  
Sleep Apnoea ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Healthy Humans ◽  
Dilator Muscle ◽  
Obstructive Sleep ◽  
Airway Collapsibility ◽  
Upper Airway Collapsibility

We recently demonstrated that desipramine reduces the sleep-related loss of upper airway dilator muscle activity and reduces pharyngeal collapsibility in healthy humans without obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA). The aim of the present physiological study was to determine the effects of desipramine on upper airway collapsibility and apnoea–hypopnea index (AHI) in OSA patients.A placebo-controlled, double-blind, randomised crossover trial in 14 OSA patients was performed. Participants received treatment or placebo in randomised order before sleep. Pharyngeal collapsibility (critical collapsing pressure of the upper airway (Pcrit)) and ventilation under both passive (V′0,passive) and active (V′0,active) upper airway muscle conditions were evaluated with continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) manipulation. AHI was quantified off CPAP.Desipramine reduced activePcrit(median (interquartile range) −5.2 (4.3) cmH2O on desipramineversus−1.9 (2.7) cmH2O on placebo; p=0.049) but not passivePcrit(−2.2 (3.4)versus−0.7 (2.1) cmH2O; p=0.135). A greater reduction in AHI occurred in those with minimal muscle compensation (defined asV′0,active−V′0,passive) on placebo (r=0.71, p=0.009). The reduction in AHI was driven by the improvement in muscle compensation (r=0.72, p=0.009).In OSA patients, noradrenergic stimulation with desipramine improves pharyngeal collapsibility and may be an effective treatment in patients with minimal upper airway muscle compensation.

Volume-pressure properties of the upper airway in normal subjects and patients with obstructive sleep apnoea

Respirology ◽  
1999 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 69-75 ◽  
Author(s):  
Denan Wu ◽  
Wataru Hida ◽  
Yoshihiro Kikuchi ◽  
Shinichi Okabe ◽  
Hajime Kurosawa ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Obstructive Sleep Apnoea ◽  
Upper Airway ◽  
Normal Subjects ◽  
Sleep Apnoea ◽  
Obstructive Sleep

scholarly journals P019 Obstructive sleep apnoea endotypes in people with multiple sclerosis

2021 ◽  
Vol 2 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. A27-A28
Author(s):  
S Carter ◽  
H Hensen ◽  
A Krishnan ◽  
A Chiang ◽  
J Carberry ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Sclerosis ◽  
Obstructive Sleep Apnoea ◽  
Group Analysis ◽  
Respiratory Control ◽  
Upper Airway ◽  
Sleep Apnoea ◽  
Loop Gain ◽  
Male Predominance ◽  
Arousal Threshold ◽  
Obstructive Sleep

Abstract Purpose Obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA) is common in people with multiple sclerosis (MS) despite a lack of typical risk factors for OSA in people with MS such as obesity and male predominance. Therefore, underlying factors other than sex and obesity may be particularly important in the pathogenesis of OSA in people with MS. Thus, the primary aim of this study was to determine the relative contributions of OSA endotypes in people with MS and compare this to matched controls with OSA only. Methods Eleven people with MS and OSA (MS-OSA group) (apnoea-hypopnoea index [AHI]&gt;5events/h) and eleven controls matched for OSA severity, age and sex without MS (OSA group) were studied. Participants underwent a detailed overnight polysomnography with an epiglottic pressure catheter and genioglossus intramuscular electrodes to allow for quantification of pathophysiological contributors to OSA. This included the respiratory arousal threshold, genioglossus muscle responsiveness, respiratory loop gain and upper airway collapsibility. Results Measures of the four primary OSA endotypes were not different between the MS-OSA and OSA groups (e.g. NREM respiratory arousal threshold -27±15 vs. -23±8 cmH2O respectively, p=0.24). Within group analysis indicated higher loop gain in non-obese MS-OSA participants compared to obese MS-OSA participants (0.53±0.11 vs. 0.37±0.11, p=0.04). Conclusions Overall, OSA endotypes are similar between MS-OSA participants and matched OSA controls. However, within the MS-OSA group, non-obese participants have higher loop gain (unstable respiratory control) compared to obese participants. Thus, unstable respiratory control may play an important role in OSA pathogenesis in many people with MS.

Rhinological interventions for obstructive sleep apnoea – a systematic review and descriptive meta-analysis

2019 ◽  
Vol 133 (03) ◽  
pp. 168-176 ◽  
Author(s):  
S Sharma ◽  
J C R Wormald ◽  
J M Fishman ◽  
P Andrews ◽  
B T Kotecha
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Obstructive Sleep Apnoea ◽  
Surgical Intervention ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Upper Airway ◽  
Sleep Apnoea ◽  
Current Evidence ◽  
Nasal Surgery ◽  
Surgical Interventions ◽  
Obstructive Sleep

AbstractObjectivesObstructive sleep apnoea is a common chronic sleep disorder characterised by collapse of the upper airway during sleep. The nasal airway forms a significant part of the upper airway and any obstruction is thought to have an impact on obstructive sleep apnoea. A systematic review was performed to determine the role of rhinological surgical interventions in the management of obstructive sleep apnoea.MethodsA systematic review of current literature was undertaken; studies were included if they involved comparison of a non-surgical and/or non-rhinological surgical intervention with a rhinological surgical intervention for treatment of obstructive sleep apnoea.ResultsSixteen studies met the selection criteria. The pooled data suggest that there are reductions in the apnoea/hypopnea index and respiratory disturbance index following nasal surgery. However, the current body of studies is too heterogeneous for statistically significant meta-analysis to be conducted.ConclusionNasal surgery may have limited benefit for a subset of patients based on current evidence.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document