scholarly journals Introduction to the Special Issue on Clinical and Public Health Genomics: Opportunities for translational behavioral medicine research, practice, and policy

2018 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
pp. 4-6 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kristi D Graves ◽  
Michael J Hall ◽  
Kenneth P Tercyak
Author(s):  
Marie Boltz ◽  
Holly Rau ◽  
Paula Williams ◽  
Holly Rau ◽  
Paula Williams ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 9 (6) ◽  
pp. 1248-1255 ◽  
Author(s):  
James F Sallis

Researchers are encouraged to become involved in translating research findings to policy and practice for the purpose of enhancing health impact. A model of five pathways of research translation is proposed that allows researchers to use a pathway that fits their needs: research, practice, business, policy, and public opinion pathways.


2010 ◽  
Vol 32 (2) ◽  
pp. 292-293
Author(s):  
H. Burton

2021 ◽  
pp. 003335492110557
Author(s):  
Karen L. Niemchick ◽  
Ally Goerge ◽  
Amy H. Ponte

Objective With the completion of the Human Genome Project and swift development of genomic technologies, public health practitioners can use these advancements to more precisely target disease interventions to populations at risk. To integrate these innovations into better health outcomes, public health professionals need to have at least a basic understanding of genomics within various disciplines of public health. This descriptive study focused on the current level of genomics content in accredited master of public health (MPH) programs in the United States. Methods We conducted an internet search on all 171 Council on Education for Public Health (CEPH)–accredited MPH programs in the United States for genomics content in required and elective courses using the search terms “genetics,” “genomics,” and “molecular.” Results Of the 171 CEPH-accredited MPH programs examined, 52 (30.4%) schools and programs in 34 states offered some type of genomics education. Thirty-five (20.5%) schools and programs had a course in genetic epidemiology, 29 (16.9%) had a course in genetic biostatistics or bioinformatics, and 17 (9.9%) had a course in general public health genomics. The remaining 119 offered no course with a focus on genetics or genomics. In addition, some electives or specifically focused courses related to genomics were offered. Conclusion We found inadequate training in public health genomics for MPH students. To realize the promise of precision public health and to increase the understanding of genomics among the public health workforce, MPH programs need to find ways to integrate genomics education into their curricula.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document