scholarly journals Developing adaptive forest management strategies to cope with climate change

2000 ◽  
Vol 20 (5-6) ◽  
pp. 299-307 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Linder
2011 ◽  
Vol 69 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-15 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rasoul Yousefpour ◽  
Jette Bredahl Jacobsen ◽  
Bo Jellesmark Thorsen ◽  
Henrik Meilby ◽  
Marc Hanewinkel ◽  
...  

2013 ◽  
Vol 29 (sup1) ◽  
pp. 96-107 ◽  
Author(s):  
Werner Rammer ◽  
Christian Schauflinger ◽  
Harald Vacik ◽  
João H.N. Palma ◽  
Jordi Garcia-Gonzalo ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 875 (1) ◽  
pp. 012040
Author(s):  
N Prokhorova ◽  
E Moiseeva ◽  
Z Govedar

Abstract The article examines the systems of adaptive forest management in the Republika Srpska (Bosnia and Herzegovina) and forest-steppe and steppe regions of the Central Black Earth region of Russia (within the Voronezh region) in the context of climate change, suggests measures for adaptive forest management. The concept of adaptive measures can be useful to rationalize and focus existing views on adaptation and restoration of forests. This area is designed to help reforestation, with particular attention to the ability of ecosystems to self-organize in the future and adapt to changing environmental conditions. adaptive capacity It is imperative to consider new or unparalleled ecosystems to ensure the best mix of ecosystem services in the face of future uncertainties. substantiation of improving models of forestry in the context of climate change and ensuring their practical implementation. Directions for further research in this area should relate to the development of risk-based planning approaches and multi-stakeholder decision-making.


2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (3) ◽  
pp. 413-425 ◽  
Author(s):  
Moonil Kim ◽  
Somin Yoo ◽  
Nahui Kim ◽  
Wona Lee ◽  
Boyoung Ham ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Thomas Holmes ◽  
Steve McNulty ◽  
James Vose ◽  
Jeffrey Prestemon ◽  
Harbin Li

Forests ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 9 (10) ◽  
pp. 626 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert Scheller ◽  
Rajan Parajuli

Understanding perceptions and attitudes of forest managers toward climate change and climate adaptive forest management is crucial, as they are expected to implement changes to forest resource management. We assessed the perceptions of forest managers toward climate adaptive forest management practices through a survey of forest managers working in private firms and public agencies in New England and the Klamath ecoregion (northern California and southwestern Oregon). We analyzed the motivations, actions, and potential barriers to action of forest managers toward climate adaptive forest management practices. Results suggest that managing for natural regeneration is the most common climate adaptive forest management approach considered by forest managers in both regions. Lack of information about the best strategies for reducing climate change risks, lack of education and awareness among the clients, and perceived client costs were forest managers’ primary barriers to climate adaptive management. Our findings suggest useful insights toward the policy and program design in climate adaptive forest management for both areas.


2012 ◽  
Vol 69 (5) ◽  
pp. 531-531 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rasoul Yousefpour ◽  
Jette Bredahl Jacobsen ◽  
Bo Jellesmark Thorsen ◽  
Henrik Meilby ◽  
Marc Hanewinkel ◽  
...  

2010 ◽  
Vol 2010 ◽  
pp. 1-14 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Paige Fischer ◽  
Susan Charnley

Nonindustrial private—or “family”—forests hold great potential for sequestering carbon and have received much attention in discussions about forestry-based climate change mitigation. However, little is known about social and cultural influences on owners' willingness to manage for carbon and respond to policies designed to encourage carbon-oriented management. We review the published literature to examine how family forest owners' values, ecological knowledge, risk perceptions, and forest management and policy preferences may affect their interest in managing for carbon sequestration. We find that although family forest owners may not be particularly motivated to mitigate climate change, their forest management values and practices compliment many carbon-oriented management strategies. However, the strong value owners place on privacy and autonomy, and the weak importance many place on financial reward, may inhibit participation in policies and programs that incentivize carbon-oriented management. These findings also have implications for policy efforts to encourage management for other ecological values besides carbon sequestration on family forestlands.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document