scholarly journals A Study of the Prevalence, Origin, Insertion, and Innervation of the Gantzer muscle – A Variant Forearm Muscle

2021 ◽  
Vol 35 (S1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Zachary Pellis ◽  
M. Catherine Bandak ◽  
Alexys Bolden ◽  
Matthew Zdilla ◽  
H. Wayne Lambert
Keyword(s):  
2011 ◽  
Vol 112 (8) ◽  
pp. 2839-2847 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marc Philippe ◽  
Daniel Wegst ◽  
Tom Müller ◽  
Christian Raschner ◽  
Martin Burtscher

Author(s):  
Michel Marina ◽  
Priscila Torrado ◽  
Raul Bescós

Despite a reduction in the maximal voluntary isometric contraction (MVCisom) observed systematically in intermittent fatigue protocols (IFP), decrements of the median frequency, assessed by surface electromyography (sEMG), has not been consistently verified. This study aimed to determine whether recovery periods of 60 s were too long to induce a reduction in the normalized median frequency (MFEMG) of the flexor digitorum superficialis and carpi radialis muscles. Twenty-one road racing motorcycle riders performed an IFP that simulated the posture and braking gesture on a motorcycle. The MVCisom was reduced by 53% (p < 0.001). A positive and significant relationship (p < 0.005) was found between MFEMG and duration of the fatiguing task when 5 s contractions at 30% MVCisom were interspersed by 5 s recovery in both muscles. In contrast, no relationship was found (p > 0.133) when 10 s contractions at 50% MVC were interspersed by 1 min recovery. Comparative analysis of variance (ANOVA) confirmed a decrement of MFEMG in the IFP at 30% MVCisom including short recovery periods with a duty cycle of 100% (5 s/5 s = 1), whereas no differences were observed in the IFP at 50% MVCisom and longer recovery periods, with a duty cycle of 16%. These findings show that recovery periods during IFP are more relevant than the intensity of MVCisom. Thus, we recommend the use of short recovery periods between 5 and 10 s after submaximal muscle contractions for specific forearm muscle training and testing purposes in motorcycle riders.


Designs ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 5 (3) ◽  
pp. 39
Author(s):  
Maria Lazzaroni ◽  
Tommaso Poliero ◽  
Matteo Sposito ◽  
Stefano Toxiri ◽  
Darwin G. Caldwell ◽  
...  

The execution of manual material handling activities in the workplace exposes workers to large lumbar loads that increase the risk of musculoskeletal disorders and low back pain. In particular, the redesign of the workplace is making the execution of pulling activities more common, as an alternative to lifting and carrying tasks. The biomechanical analysis of the task revealed a substantial activation of the spinal muscles. This suggests that the user may benefit from the assistance of a back-support exoskeleton that reduces the spinal muscle activity and their contribution to lumbar compression. This work addresses this challenge by exploiting the versatility of an active back-support exoskeleton. A control strategy was specifically designed for assisting pulling that modulates the assistive torques using the forearm muscle activity. These torques are expected to adapt to the user’s assistance needs and the pulled object mass, as forearm muscle activity is considered an indicator of grip strength. We devised laboratory experiments to assess the feasibility and effectiveness of the proposed strategy. We found that, for the majority of the subjects, back muscle activity reductions were associated with the exoskeleton use. Furthermore, subjective measurements reveal advantages in terms of perceived support, comfort, ease of use, and intuitiveness.


2016 ◽  
Vol 116 (8) ◽  
pp. 1479-1484 ◽  
Author(s):  
Simon Fryer ◽  
Lee Stoner ◽  
K. Stone ◽  
D. Giles ◽  
Joakim Sveen ◽  
...  

2003 ◽  
Vol 32 (6) ◽  
pp. 364-366 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tuba Karagülle Kendi ◽  
Deniz Altınok ◽  
Haydar Hüseyin Erdal ◽  
Simay Kara
Keyword(s):  

2011 ◽  
Vol 49 (5) ◽  
pp. 575-581 ◽  
Author(s):  
In-Gyu YOO ◽  
Jin LEE ◽  
Min-Ye JUNG ◽  
Joo-Hyun LEE
Keyword(s):  

2000 ◽  
Vol 279 (5) ◽  
pp. R1565-R1573 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dane B. Cook ◽  
Patrick J. O'Connor ◽  
Chester A. Ray

The purpose of this experiment was to examine the effects of the endogenous opioid system on forearm muscle pain and muscle sympathetic nerve activity (MSNA) during dynamic fatiguing exercise. Twelve college-age men (24 ± 4 yr) performed graded (1-min stages; 30 contractions/min) handgrip to fatigue 1 h after the ingestion of either 60 mg codeine, 50 mg naltrexone, or placebo. Pain (0–10 scale) and exertion (0–10 and 6–20 scales) intensities were measured during the last 15 s of each minute of exercise and every 15 s during recovery. MSNA was measured continuously from the peroneal nerve in the left leg. Pain threshold occurred earlier [1.8 ± 1, 2.2 ± 1, 2.2 ± 1 J: codeine, naltrexone, and placebo, respectively] and was associated with a lower rating of perceived exertion (RPE) (2.7 ± 2, 3.6 ± 2, 3.8 ± 2: codeine, naltrexone, and placebo, respectively) in the codeine condition compared with either the naltrexone or placebo conditions. There were no main effects (i.e., drugs) or interaction (i.e., drugs × time) for either forearm muscle pain or RPE during exercise [pain: F (2, 22) = 0.69, P = 0.51]. There was no effect of drug on MSNA, heart rate, or blood pressure during baseline, exercise, or recovery. Peak exercise MSNA responses were 21 ± 1, 21 ± 2.0, and 21 ± 2.0 bursts/30 s for codeine, naltrexone, and placebo conditions, respectively. Peak mean arterial pressure responses were 135 ± 4, 131 ± 3, and 132 ± 4 mmHg for codeine, naltrexone, and placebo conditions, respectively. It is concluded that neither 60 mg codeine nor 50 mg naltrexone has an effect on forearm muscle pain, exertion, or MSNA during high- intensity handgrip to fatigue.


2020 ◽  
Vol Publish Ahead of Print ◽  
Author(s):  
Jasdeep Kaur ◽  
Thales C. Barbosa ◽  
Damsara Nandadeva ◽  
Benjamin E. Young ◽  
Brandi Y. Stephens ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document