Combined Epidural and General Anesthesia versus General Anesthesia for Abdominal Aortic Surgery

1991 ◽  
Vol 75 (4) ◽  
pp. 611-618 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jean-François Baron ◽  
Michèle Bertrand ◽  
Eric Barré ◽  
Gilles Godet ◽  
Olivier Mundler ◽  
...  
2012 ◽  
Vol 65 (7-8) ◽  
pp. 289-293
Author(s):  
Dragana Unic-Stojanovic ◽  
Vojislava Neskovic ◽  
Ivan Ilic

Introduction. Thoracic epidural analgesia, combined with general anesthesia, is an established anesthetic choice for abdominal aortic surgery. However, there are controversies about the level of anesthesia as well as the dose and concentration of the local anesthetic used. The aim of the study was to compare the effects of two different concentrations of epidural bupivacaine on sevoflurane requirements and hemodynamic parameters during aortic surgery under combined epidural/general anesthesia. Methods and Material. Sixty patients scheduled for abdominal aortic surgery were randomly divided into two groups according to the concentration of local anesthetic used for epidural anesthesia: - Group 1- low concentration - where 0.125% bupivacaine was used, and - Group 2 - high concentration - where 0.5% bupivacaine was used at the beginning and then the concentration was reduced to 0.25%. Anesthesia was maintained with sevoflurane, the dose was adjusted to achieve the target entropy of 40-60. The measurements included the inspired sevoflurane concentrations, blood pressure, and heart rate at the beginning and every 5 min during the surgery. Results. Both groups had similar heart rate and blood pressure, but the inspired sevoflurane concentration was significantly higher and more variable in patients where bupivacaine 0.125% was used. Vasopressors were used more often and in higher doses in the 0.5% bupivacaine group, and in the same group the blood loss and fluid requirements were reduced. Conclusion. When 0.5% bupivacaine is used in combined thoracic epidural/ general anesthesia for aortic surgery, the sevoflurane concentrations are lower and less variable. In addition, the blood loss and fluid requirements are reduced.


1990 ◽  
Vol 4 (5) ◽  
pp. 552-557 ◽  
Author(s):  
Charles Her ◽  
Grigory Kizelshteyn ◽  
Valerie Walker ◽  
Deborah Hayes ◽  
David Eric Lees

1998 ◽  
Vol 89 (3) ◽  
pp. 585-593. ◽  
Author(s):  
John F. Boylan ◽  
Joel Katz ◽  
Brian P. Kavanagh ◽  
John R. Klinck ◽  
Davy C. H. Cheng ◽  
...  

Background The efficacy and effects of epidural analgesia compared with patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) have not been reported in patients undergoing major vascular surgery. We compared the effects of epidural bupivacaine-morphine with those of intravenous PCA morphine after elective infrarenal aortic surgery. Methods Forty patients classified as American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status 2 or 3 received general anesthesia plus postoperative PCA using morphine sulfate (group PCA; n = 21) or general anesthesia plus perioperative epidural morphine-bupivacaine (group EPI; n = 19) during a period of 48 h. During operation, EPI patients received 0.05 mg/kg epidural morphine and 5 ml 0.25% bupivacaine followed by an infusion of 0.125% bupivacaine with 0.1% morphine (0.1 mg/ ml); group PCA received 0.1 mg/kg intravenous morphine sulfate. Continuous electrocardiographic monitoring (V4 and V5 leads) was performed from the night before surgery until 48 h afterward. Respiratory inductive plethysmographic data were recorded after tracheal extubation. Visual analog pain scores at rest and after movement were performed every 4 h after extubation. Results Nurse-administered intravenous morphine and time to tracheal extubation were less in group EPI, as were visual analog pain scores at rest and after movement from 20 to 48 h. Complications and the duration of intensive care unit and hospital stay were comparable. There was a similar, low incidence of postoperative apneas, slow respiratory rates, desaturation, and S-T segment depression. Conclusions Epidural morphine-bupivacaine is associated with reduced early postoperative intravenous opioid requirements, more rapid tracheal extubation, and superior analgesia after abdominal aortic surgery, with comparable respiratory effects.


2003 ◽  
Vol 29 (10) ◽  
pp. 1821-1824 ◽  
Author(s):  
Frédérique Ryckwaert ◽  
Pierre Alric ◽  
Marie-Christine Picot ◽  
Kela Djoufelkit ◽  
Pascal Colson

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document