Can the Tomographic Aspect Characteristics of Patients Presenting with Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome Predict Improvement in Oxygenation-related Response to the Prone Position?

2002 ◽  
Vol 97 (3) ◽  
pp. 599-607 ◽  
Author(s):  
Laurent Papazian ◽  
Marie-Héléne Paladini ◽  
Fabienne Bregeon ◽  
Xavier Thirion ◽  
Olivier Durieux ◽  
...  

Background In some patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome, the prone position is able to improve oxygenation, whereas in others it is not. It could be hypothesized that the more opacities that are present in dependent regions of the lung when the patient is in the supine position, the better the improvement in oxygenation is observed when the patients are turned prone. Therefore, we conducted a prospective study to identify computed tomographic scan aspects that could accurately predict who will respond to the prone position. Methods We included 46 patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (31 responders and 15 nonresponders). Computed tomographic scan was performed in the 6-h period preceding prone position. Blood gas analyses were performed before and at the end of the first 6-h period of prone position. Results Arterial oxygen partial pressure/fraction of inspired oxygen increased from 117 +/- 42 (mean +/- SD) in the supine position to 200 +/- 76 mmHg in the prone position (P < 0.001). There were 31 responders and 15 nonresponders. There was a vertebral predominance of the opacities (P < 0.0001). However, there was no difference between responders and nonresponders. When only the amount of consolidated lung located under the heart was evaluated, there was more consolidated tissue under the heart relative to total lung area in nonresponders than in responders (P = 0.01). Conclusions There are no distinctive morphologic features in the pattern of lung disease measured by computed tomographic scanning performed with the patient in the supine position that can predict response to the prone position.

2020 ◽  
Vol 2020 ◽  
pp. 1-9
Author(s):  
Zanfeng Cao ◽  
Zhanzheng Yang ◽  
Zijing Liang ◽  
Qingyan Cen ◽  
Zuopeng Zhang ◽  
...  

The purpose of this meta-analysis was to compare the efficacy and safety of prone versus supine position ventilation for adult acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) patients. The electronic databases of PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library were systematically searched from their inception up to September 2020. The relative risks (RRs) and weighted mean differences (WMDs) with corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were employed to calculate pooled outcomes using the random-effects models. Twelve randomized controlled trials that had recruited a total of 2264 adults with ARDS were selected for the final meta-analysis. The risk of mortality in patients who received prone position ventilation was 13% lower than for those who received supine ventilation, but this effect was not statistically significant (RR: 0.87; 95% CI: 0.75–1.00; P  = 0.055). There were no significant differences between prone and supine position ventilation on the duration of mechanical ventilation (WMD: −0.22; P  = 0.883) or ICU stays (WMD: –0.39; P  = 0.738). The pooled RRs indicate that patients who received prone position ventilation had increased incidence of pressure scores (RR: 1.23; P  = 0.003), displacement of a thoracotomy tube (RR: 3.14; P  = 0.047), and endotracheal tube obstruction (RR: 2.45; P  = 0.001). The results indicated that prone positioning during ventilation might have a beneficial effect on mortality, though incidence of several adverse events was significantly increased for these patients.


2003 ◽  
Vol 31 (12) ◽  
pp. 2727-2733 ◽  
Author(s):  
Luciano Gattinoni ◽  
Federica Vagginelli ◽  
Eleonora Carlesso ◽  
Paolo Taccone ◽  
Valeria Conte ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 39 (1) ◽  
pp. 39-46 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alberto Lucchini ◽  
Stefano Bambi ◽  
Elisa Mattiussi ◽  
Stefano Elli ◽  
Laura Villa ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document