Relationship between Aortic-to-radial Arterial Pressure Gradient after Cardiopulmonary Bypass and Changes in Arterial Elasticity

2003 ◽  
Vol 99 (1) ◽  
pp. 48-53 ◽  
Author(s):  
Masahiro Kanazawa ◽  
Haruo Fukuyama ◽  
Yoshio Kinefuchi ◽  
Mamoru Takiguchi ◽  
Toshiyasu Suzuki

Background An aortic-to-radial arterial pressure gradient may develop during and after cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB). The mechanisms of this pressure gradient remain controversial. To clarify the cause of the pressure gradient after CPB, the authors investigated the relationship between the pressure gradient and changes in the pulse wave velocity (PWV) before and after CPB. Methods The pressure gradient from the aorta to the radial artery and a change in PWV were measured with a wire (0.37 mm in diameter) tipped with a miniature pressure transducer in 12 patients undergoing cardiac surgery. The pressure distributions and waveforms were measured and recorded with electrocardiograph. The PWV was calculated by measuring the propagation time between the R wave of the electrocardiograph and the rising point of the arterial pressure waveform at 10-cm intervals. Results After CPB, 7 of 12 patients demonstrated a marked pressure gradient. In these patients, the pressure distribution showed a gradual decrease toward the periphery without a precipitous step-down in pressure at any one specific anatomic location. The PWV decreased as the intraarterial pressure decreased from the aorta to the radial artery, and the relative arterial elasticity decreased linearly toward the periphery. Conclusions The results showed that the decrease in PWV implies a decrease in arterial elasticity, and the decrease in the arterial elasticity correlated with the decrease in intraarterial pressure. These findings demonstrated that a radial artery pressure lower than the aortic pressure after CPB may be due to the decrease in arterial elasticity.

2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Matthias Jacquet-Lagrèze ◽  
David Claveau ◽  
Julie Cousineau ◽  
Kun Peng Liu ◽  
Jean-Gilles Guimond ◽  
...  

Abstract Background In patient requiring vasopressors, the radial artery pressure may underestimate the true central aortic pressure leading to unnecessary interventions. When using a femoral and a radial arterial line, this femoral-to-radial arterial pressure gradient (FR-APG) can be detected. Our main objective was to assess the accuracy of non-invasive blood pressure (NIBP) measures; specifically, measuring the gradient between the NIBP obtained at the brachial artery and the radial artery pressure and calculating the non-invasive brachial-to-radial arterial pressure gradient (NIBR-APG) to detect an FR-APG. The secondary objective was to assess the prevalence of the FR-APG in a targeted sample of critically ill patients. Methods Adult patients in an intensive care unit requiring vasopressors and instrumented with a femoral and a radial artery line were selected. We recorded invasive radial and femoral arterial pressure, and brachial NIBP. Measurements were repeated each hour for 2 h. A significant FR-APG (our reference standard) was defined by either a mean arterial pressure (MAP) difference of more than 10 mmHg or a systolic arterial pressure (SAP) difference of more than 25 mmHg. The diagnostic accuracy of the NIBR-APG (our index test) to detect a significant FR-APG was estimated and the prevalence of an FR-APG was measured and correlated with the NIBR-APG. Results Eighty-one patients aged 68 [IQR 58–75] years and an SAPS2 score of 35 (SD 7) were included from which 228 measurements were obtained. A significant FR-APG occurred in 15 patients with a prevalence of 18.5% [95%CI 10.8–28.7%]. Diabetes was significantly associated with a significant FR-APG. The use of a 11 mmHg difference in MAP between the NIBP at the brachial artery and the MAP of the radial artery led to a specificity of 92% [67; 100], a sensitivity of 100% [95%CI 83; 100] and an AUC ROC of 0.93 [95%CI 0.81–0.99] to detect a significant FR-APG. SAP and MAP FR-APG correlated with SAP (r2 = 0.36; p < 0.001) and MAP (r2 = 0.34; p < 0.001) NIBR-APG. Conclusion NIBR-APG assessment can be used to detect a significant FR-APG which occur in one in every five critically ill patients requiring vasoactive agents.


2002 ◽  
Vol 96 (Sup 2) ◽  
pp. A161 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fadia A. Haddad ◽  
Ghassan T. Sleilaty ◽  
Alexander G. Yazigi ◽  
Samia N. Madi-Jebara ◽  
Gemma N. Hayek

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document