Using Behavior Setting Theory To Define Natural Settings

2002 ◽  
Vol 14 (3) ◽  
pp. 65-71 ◽  
Author(s):  
Caroline Monforte Tisot ◽  
S Kenneth Thurman
Keyword(s):  
Behavior Setting ◽  
Setting Theory ◽  
Natural Settings

Behavior setting theory and community psychology: An analysis and critique

1988 ◽  
Vol 16 (4) ◽  
pp. 355-372 ◽  
Author(s):  
David V. Perkins ◽  
Thomas F. Burns ◽  
Jonathan C. Perry ◽  
Kathleen P. Nielsen
Keyword(s):  
Community Psychology ◽  
Behavior Setting ◽  
Setting Theory

How settings change people: Applying behavior setting theory to consumer-run organizations

2007 ◽  
Vol 35 (3) ◽  
pp. 399-416 ◽  
Author(s):  
Louis D. Brown ◽  
Matthew D. Shepherd ◽  
Scott A. Wituk ◽  
Greg Meissen
Keyword(s):  
Behavior Setting ◽  
Setting Theory

Setting phenotypes in a mutual help organization: Expanding behavior setting theory

1991 ◽  
Vol 19 (1) ◽  
pp. 147-167 ◽  
Author(s):  
Douglas A. Luke ◽  
Julian Rappaport ◽  
Edward Seidman
Keyword(s):  
Mutual Help ◽  
Behavior Setting ◽  
Setting Theory

Behavioral Assessment of Social Interactions in Natural Settings

1996 ◽  
Vol 12 (2) ◽  
pp. 124-131 ◽  
Author(s):  
Carlos Santoyo
Keyword(s):  
Social Skills ◽  
Social Interaction ◽  
Social Interactions ◽  
Behavioral Assessment ◽  
Behavioral Observation ◽  
Social Responsiveness ◽  
Social Agents ◽  
Social Effectiveness ◽  
Natural Settings

The present paper deals with behavioral assessment of social interaction in natural settings. The design of observational systems that allow the identification of the direction, contents, quality and social agents involved in a social interchange is an aim of social interaction assessment and research. In the first part a description of a system of behavioral observation of social interaction is presented. This system permits the identification of the above mentioned aspects. Secondly a strategy for the behavioral assessment of social skills is described. This strategy is based on the consequences and effects of social interaction, and it is supported by three basic processes: social effectiveness, social responsiveness and reciprocity.

Is the Musical Stroop Effect Able to Keep Its Promises?

2014 ◽  
Vol 61 (1) ◽  
pp. 80-83 ◽  
Author(s):  
Laurent Grégoire ◽  
Pierre Perruchet ◽  
Bénédicte Poulin-Charronnat
Keyword(s):  
Stroop Task ◽  
Stroop Effect ◽  
Extensive Training ◽  
Natural Settings ◽  
Current Procedure

Grégoire, Perruchet, and Poulin-Charronnat (2013) claimed that the Musical Stroop task, which reveals the automaticity of note naming in musician experts, provides a new tool for studying the development of automatisms through extensive training in natural settings. Many of the criticisms presented in the four commentaries published in this issue appear to be based on a misunderstanding of our procedure, or questionable postulates. We maintain that the Musical Stroop Effect offers promising possibilities for further research on automaticity, with the main proviso that the current procedure makes it difficult to tease apart facilitation and interference.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document